AMD A64 X2 5000+ Black Edition vs C2D E6550

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

dennilfloss

Past Lifer 1957-2014 In Memoriam
Oct 21, 1999
30,509
12
0
dennilfloss.blogspot.com
Originally posted by: j0j081
Originally posted by: j0j081
It even says this in the article momobirds.

"Of course there's nothing to keep you from overclocking the Intel processors included for comparison here as well. However, within this article we are considering the 5000+ Black Edition primarily as a CPU upgrade for people with existing AM2 systems, meaning that Intel processors are not an option."

what part of this quote I already posted don't you guys understand? they were looking at it primarily as an upgrade option for someone already with a compatible system and probably just seeing what intel cpu they could get it to match up with.

That makes perfect sense to me. If my mobo was AM2 instead of socket 939, I'd definitely look this one up. :)

 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
Not a bad article, really. I don't understand why some of you guys get yer panties in such a wad . . .
 

BigDH01

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2005
1,631
88
91
Originally posted by: j0j081
It even says this in the article momobirds.

"Of course there's nothing to keep you from overclocking the Intel processors included for comparison here as well. However, within this article we are considering the 5000+ Black Edition primarily as a CPU upgrade for people with existing AM2 systems, meaning that Intel processors are not an option."

Which is stupid. If Intel CPUs aren't an option, why compare them to Intel CPUs at all (stock or otherwise)? If you are going to show the performance of Intel CPUs, as if there was the possibility you could own one, you might as well show how they will do overclocked.
 

perdomot

Golden Member
Dec 7, 2004
1,390
0
76
I think they didn't show the OC'd intel because its common knowledge that they wipe the floor with AMD when OC'd. To me, they were showing where an OC'd 5000+ landed in terms of performance when compared to intel. If you can only afford to upgrade the cpu, it would be quite handy to see how it stacks up to intel in order to decide whether or not its worth the money. It would be pointless to show the intel OC'd since the person would have to buy a new cpu and motherboard and that might be outside their budget. I liked the article and showing where they OC'd 5000+ lands on their charts useful.
 

BigDH01

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2005
1,631
88
91
Originally posted by: perdomot
I think they didn't show the OC'd intel because its common knowledge that they wipe the floor with AMD when OC'd. To me, they were showing where an OC'd 5000+ landed in terms of performance when compared to intel. If you can only afford to upgrade the cpu, it would be quite handy to see how it stacks up to intel in order to decide whether or not its worth the money. It would be pointless to show the intel OC'd since the person would have to buy a new cpu and motherboard and that might be outside their budget. I liked the article and showing where they OC'd 5000+ lands on their charts useful.

But they'd also need a new CPU and motherboard if they were using a stock Intel chip as well. And if you want to tell if it's worth the money, then you should compare its overclocked performance to the performance of an overclocked Intel chip of the same price. Then you could decide if it would be worth it to buy a new MB. That's why the author's tests don't follow from his premise.
 

Pederv

Golden Member
May 13, 2000
1,903
0
0
I thought the article was about how the 5000+ Black Edition performed, not about who's chip overclocks the best.
Did I miss something?
 

perdomot

Golden Member
Dec 7, 2004
1,390
0
76
BigDH01,
I meant that if they were going to upgrade the cpu on their existing AM2 rig, it would be cheaper than going with an intel solution which would require a new mobo. The article even states on the first page that the article is about upgrading the cpu on AM2 systems and what the benefits are. Buying a cpu for $127 that can get you close to the top tier of intels running at default speeds seems like a great deal to me. Remember this article from last month?: http://www.tomshardware.com/20.../12/pentium_dual_core/
I like these value oriented articles because they help me get great performance at low prices. I wish more sites did them instead of trying to OC the top-of-the-line chips which cost more than most people want to spend. What bugs me is that it seems the main "sin" was that THG did the review. I get the impression that if Anandtech did it, the same posters would be praising the article for helping us save money and getting great performance.
 

Pederv

Golden Member
May 13, 2000
1,903
0
0
Originally posted by: perdomot
BigDH01,
What bugs me is that it seems the main "sin" was that THG did the review. I get the impression that if Anandtech did it, the same posters would be praising the article for helping us save money and getting great performance.


Take what ANY web site reports with a grain of salt.
 

jonmcc33

Banned
Feb 24, 2002
1,504
0
0
Originally posted by: BigDH01
Originally posted by: j0j081
It even says this in the article momobirds.

"Of course there's nothing to keep you from overclocking the Intel processors included for comparison here as well. However, within this article we are considering the 5000+ Black Edition primarily as a CPU upgrade for people with existing AM2 systems, meaning that Intel processors are not an option."

Which is stupid. If Intel CPUs aren't an option, why compare them to Intel CPUs at all (stock or otherwise)? If you are going to show the performance of Intel CPUs, as if there was the possibility you could own one, you might as well show how they will do overclocked.

LOL! Shows you how dumb THG really is. I'd rather upgrade to an Intel C2D rig than buy a Black Edition processor.
 

jonmcc33

Banned
Feb 24, 2002
1,504
0
0
Originally posted by: Pederv
Originally posted by: perdomot
BigDH01,
What bugs me is that it seems the main "sin" was that THG did the review. I get the impression that if Anandtech did it, the same posters would be praising the article for helping us save money and getting great performance.


Take what ANY web site reports with a grain of salt.

Anand wouldn't waste his time with a review like that. THG has nothing else to report so they come up with dumb crap like this Black Edition review.
 

perdomot

Golden Member
Dec 7, 2004
1,390
0
76
I disagree. Someone running an AM2 rig with a cheapie cpu could upgrade for a small amount of money and get much better performance. That kind of info is valuable IMO. It's also important to know what the equivelent performance of a C2D would be as its what most sites discuss these days. I've seen plenty of posts asking which amd cpu is the equal of what intel cpu so this gives the reader a good reference to judge the benefit of upgrading.
 

bryanW1995

Lifer
May 22, 2007
11,144
32
91
I think that the article was written for the typical tom's reader. That sort of article makes sense over there because they would rather spend $130 for a marginal upgrade to their current system instead of $200 (after selling their current am2 mobo) to double the performance of their system. It goes without saying that most AT readers would go with B.
 

jonmcc33

Banned
Feb 24, 2002
1,504
0
0
Originally posted by: perdomot
I disagree. Someone running an AM2 rig with a cheapie cpu could upgrade for a small amount of money and get much better performance. That kind of info is valuable IMO. It's also important to know what the equivelent performance of a C2D would be as its what most sites discuss these days. I've seen plenty of posts asking which amd cpu is the equal of what intel cpu so this gives the reader a good reference to judge the benefit of upgrading.

Unlocked AMD were available for the FX series a long time ago. Seeing an unlocked AMD CPU is nothing new and that's the only thing that the Black Edition series are. Overclocking it in a review and comparing it to a stock Core 2 Duo is pathetic in my book.

THG reviews are usually half assed. I recall one of the reviews stated that the stock X1900XT heatsink didn't have heatpipes.

http://www.tomshardware.com/20...e_cooler_roundup_2006/

"There are no heat pipes in this cooler; it uses simple copper fins to dissipate heat."

Hello! If you take the plastic cover off of the cooler you can see two small heatpipes that are built into the base of the cooler! I pointed it out to the guy that did the review and he didn't feel it was worth mentioning. Wake up, at least have a clue what you are talking about.
 

21stHermit

Senior member
Dec 16, 2003
927
1
81
Originally posted by: jonmcc33
Why is anyone posting a THG review on AnandTech? Why are you even going to THG's website?
My mother used to have a favorite saying, you'd do well to consider it:
"If you don't have anything nice to say . . . Don't say anything at all"

You've made a least a half-dozen posts in this thread, all negative. Do you really hate yourself that much? Please find another thread to spread your hate!!!

Hermit
 

perdomot

Golden Member
Dec 7, 2004
1,390
0
76
Originally posted by: bryanW1995
I think that the article was written for the typical tom's reader. That sort of article makes sense over there because they would rather spend $130 for a marginal upgrade to their current system instead of $200 (after selling their current am2 mobo) to double the performance of their system. It goes without saying that most AT readers would go with B.

Bryan, it might not be as marginal an upgrade as you think. Let's say someone is running a cheap mobo with limited bios options(ECS comes to mind) and the cheapest AM2 cpu made. If the mobo can at least allow multiplier changes, your performance could jump significantly for a paltry $130. That's nothing to sneeze at. Not to mention that you are assuming that selling their old rig would be possible.
 

perdomot

Golden Member
Dec 7, 2004
1,390
0
76
Originally posted by: jonmcc33
Originally posted by: perdomot
I disagree. Someone running an AM2 rig with a cheapie cpu could upgrade for a small amount of money and get much better performance. That kind of info is valuable IMO. It's also important to know what the equivelent performance of a C2D would be as its what most sites discuss these days. I've seen plenty of posts asking which amd cpu is the equal of what intel cpu so this gives the reader a good reference to judge the benefit of upgrading.

Unlocked AMD were available for the FX series a long time ago. Seeing an unlocked AMD CPU is nothing new and that's the only thing that the Black Edition series are. Overclocking it in a review and comparing it to a stock Core 2 Duo is pathetic in my book.

THG reviews are usually half assed. I recall one of the reviews stated that the stock X1900XT heatsink didn't have heatpipes.

http://www.tomshardware.com/20...e_cooler_roundup_2006/

"There are no heat pipes in this cooler; it uses simple copper fins to dissipate heat."

Hello! If you take the plastic cover off of the cooler you can see two small heatpipes that are built into the base of the cooler! I pointed it out to the guy that did the review and he didn't feel it was worth mentioning. Wake up, at least have a clue what you are talking about.

It's quite true that AMD has had cpus with unlocked multis for some time. What you fail to mention is that they were charging a lot for those cpus. Now they are offering one at under $130 that can reach 3.1Ghz at default voltage. Definately worth a review for dollar minded people.
 

fire400

Diamond Member
Nov 21, 2005
5,204
21
81
Originally posted by: perdomot
Originally posted by: jonmcc33
Originally posted by: perdomot
I disagree. Someone running an AM2 rig with a cheapie cpu could upgrade for a small amount of money and get much better performance. That kind of info is valuable IMO. It's also important to know what the equivelent performance of a C2D would be as its what most sites discuss these days. I've seen plenty of posts asking which amd cpu is the equal of what intel cpu so this gives the reader a good reference to judge the benefit of upgrading.

Unlocked AMD were available for the FX series a long time ago. Seeing an unlocked AMD CPU is nothing new and that's the only thing that the Black Edition series are. Overclocking it in a review and comparing it to a stock Core 2 Duo is pathetic in my book.

THG reviews are usually half assed. I recall one of the reviews stated that the stock X1900XT heatsink didn't have heatpipes.

http://www.tomshardware.com/20...e_cooler_roundup_2006/

"There are no heat pipes in this cooler; it uses simple copper fins to dissipate heat."

Hello! If you take the plastic cover off of the cooler you can see two small heatpipes that are built into the base of the cooler! I pointed it out to the guy that did the review and he didn't feel it was worth mentioning. Wake up, at least have a clue what you are talking about.

It's quite true that AMD has had cpus with unlocked multis for some time. What you fail to mention is that they were charging a lot for those cpus. Now they are offering one at under $130 that can reach 3.1Ghz at default voltage. Definately worth a review for dollar minded people.

"Overclocking it in a review and comparing it to a stock Core 2 Duo is pathetic in my book."

They're just trying to be honest that Intel is way ahead of AMD. Do any of you remember how AMD used to hold booths at technology events and put up two idential systems but distinct only according to motherboards and processors, one have an Intel server chip and the other competing PC having an AMD server CPU.
As you know, AMD used to boast about their Opteron and mock Intel that if they didn't show up with a faster computer, etc.. you know, blah blah blah

I wonder if AMD still has thoughts about that now?
 

jonmcc33

Banned
Feb 24, 2002
1,504
0
0
Originally posted by: perdomot
It's quite true that AMD has had cpus with unlocked multis for some time. What you fail to mention is that they were charging a lot for those cpus. Now they are offering one at under $130 that can reach 3.1Ghz at default voltage. Definately worth a review for dollar minded people.

It doesn't need a review though. People can look at NewEgg's reviews to see what people have overclocked it to. Maybe THG could have done a simple one page notice or something but 31 pages all for one processor? What the hell?

 

jonmcc33

Banned
Feb 24, 2002
1,504
0
0
Originally posted by: 21stHermit
My mother used to have a favorite saying, you'd do well to consider it:
"If you don't have anything nice to say . . . Don't say anything at all"

You've made a least a half-dozen posts in this thread, all negative. Do you really hate yourself that much? Please find another thread to spread your hate!!!

Hermit

:laugh:

Sorry, you had me LOL @ this post. You are quite the hypocrite aren't you? Please take your personal opinion on me to PM and try to stay on topic within this thread in the future, thanks.
 

Pederv

Golden Member
May 13, 2000
1,903
0
0
Originally posted by: bryanW1995
I think that the article was written for the typical tom's reader. That sort of article makes sense over there because they would rather spend $130 for a marginal upgrade to their current system instead of $200 (after selling their current am2 mobo) to double the performance of their system. It goes without saying that most AT readers would go with B.

I'll upgrade the platform until it's pretty much maxed. The old parts go into storage until a new system can be built, for a family member for friend.

I guess I'm one of the few people on AT that are responsible for the well being of other people besides myself.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
Originally posted by: Markfw900
Exactly ! Tom's has a bullseye painted on their head for creating reviews like that. I have to say it again, its was so stupid (my quote):
"First, They OC the X2 5000+ to 3.4 (max OC) and then compare to a stock 6550@2.33, when it could also hit 3.4 and wipe the floor with the black edition ? What a moronic review. "

Sorry, I can't help it, it really is the dumbest thing I have seen even them do in a long time....

So with such a target, why even bother insulting anyone here ?

well it can matter to people who can do a drop in upgrade. sure its not going to hold up if you have to buy everything new.