wwswimming
Banned
- Jan 21, 2006
- 3,695
- 1
- 0
Why are you even going to THG's website?
to see what a website that is mostly ads looks like.
Why are you even going to THG's website?
Originally posted by: j0j081
Originally posted by: j0j081
It even says this in the article momobirds.
"Of course there's nothing to keep you from overclocking the Intel processors included for comparison here as well. However, within this article we are considering the 5000+ Black Edition primarily as a CPU upgrade for people with existing AM2 systems, meaning that Intel processors are not an option."
what part of this quote I already posted don't you guys understand? they were looking at it primarily as an upgrade option for someone already with a compatible system and probably just seeing what intel cpu they could get it to match up with.
Originally posted by: wwswimming
Why are you even going to THG's website?
to see what a website that is mostly ads looks like.
Originally posted by: j0j081
It even says this in the article momobirds.
"Of course there's nothing to keep you from overclocking the Intel processors included for comparison here as well. However, within this article we are considering the 5000+ Black Edition primarily as a CPU upgrade for people with existing AM2 systems, meaning that Intel processors are not an option."
Originally posted by: perdomot
I think they didn't show the OC'd intel because its common knowledge that they wipe the floor with AMD when OC'd. To me, they were showing where an OC'd 5000+ landed in terms of performance when compared to intel. If you can only afford to upgrade the cpu, it would be quite handy to see how it stacks up to intel in order to decide whether or not its worth the money. It would be pointless to show the intel OC'd since the person would have to buy a new cpu and motherboard and that might be outside their budget. I liked the article and showing where they OC'd 5000+ lands on their charts useful.
Originally posted by: perdomot
BigDH01,
What bugs me is that it seems the main "sin" was that THG did the review. I get the impression that if Anandtech did it, the same posters would be praising the article for helping us save money and getting great performance.
Originally posted by: BigDH01
Originally posted by: j0j081
It even says this in the article momobirds.
"Of course there's nothing to keep you from overclocking the Intel processors included for comparison here as well. However, within this article we are considering the 5000+ Black Edition primarily as a CPU upgrade for people with existing AM2 systems, meaning that Intel processors are not an option."
Which is stupid. If Intel CPUs aren't an option, why compare them to Intel CPUs at all (stock or otherwise)? If you are going to show the performance of Intel CPUs, as if there was the possibility you could own one, you might as well show how they will do overclocked.
Originally posted by: Pederv
Originally posted by: perdomot
BigDH01,
What bugs me is that it seems the main "sin" was that THG did the review. I get the impression that if Anandtech did it, the same posters would be praising the article for helping us save money and getting great performance.
Take what ANY web site reports with a grain of salt.
LOL.Originally posted by: wwswimming
Why are you even going to THG's website?
to see what a website that is mostly ads looks like.
Originally posted by: perdomot
I disagree. Someone running an AM2 rig with a cheapie cpu could upgrade for a small amount of money and get much better performance. That kind of info is valuable IMO. It's also important to know what the equivelent performance of a C2D would be as its what most sites discuss these days. I've seen plenty of posts asking which amd cpu is the equal of what intel cpu so this gives the reader a good reference to judge the benefit of upgrading.
My mother used to have a favorite saying, you'd do well to consider it:Originally posted by: jonmcc33
Why is anyone posting a THG review on AnandTech? Why are you even going to THG's website?
Originally posted by: bryanW1995
I think that the article was written for the typical tom's reader. That sort of article makes sense over there because they would rather spend $130 for a marginal upgrade to their current system instead of $200 (after selling their current am2 mobo) to double the performance of their system. It goes without saying that most AT readers would go with B.
Originally posted by: jonmcc33
Originally posted by: perdomot
I disagree. Someone running an AM2 rig with a cheapie cpu could upgrade for a small amount of money and get much better performance. That kind of info is valuable IMO. It's also important to know what the equivelent performance of a C2D would be as its what most sites discuss these days. I've seen plenty of posts asking which amd cpu is the equal of what intel cpu so this gives the reader a good reference to judge the benefit of upgrading.
Unlocked AMD were available for the FX series a long time ago. Seeing an unlocked AMD CPU is nothing new and that's the only thing that the Black Edition series are. Overclocking it in a review and comparing it to a stock Core 2 Duo is pathetic in my book.
THG reviews are usually half assed. I recall one of the reviews stated that the stock X1900XT heatsink didn't have heatpipes.
http://www.tomshardware.com/20...e_cooler_roundup_2006/
"There are no heat pipes in this cooler; it uses simple copper fins to dissipate heat."
Hello! If you take the plastic cover off of the cooler you can see two small heatpipes that are built into the base of the cooler! I pointed it out to the guy that did the review and he didn't feel it was worth mentioning. Wake up, at least have a clue what you are talking about.
Originally posted by: perdomot
Originally posted by: jonmcc33
Originally posted by: perdomot
I disagree. Someone running an AM2 rig with a cheapie cpu could upgrade for a small amount of money and get much better performance. That kind of info is valuable IMO. It's also important to know what the equivelent performance of a C2D would be as its what most sites discuss these days. I've seen plenty of posts asking which amd cpu is the equal of what intel cpu so this gives the reader a good reference to judge the benefit of upgrading.
Unlocked AMD were available for the FX series a long time ago. Seeing an unlocked AMD CPU is nothing new and that's the only thing that the Black Edition series are. Overclocking it in a review and comparing it to a stock Core 2 Duo is pathetic in my book.
THG reviews are usually half assed. I recall one of the reviews stated that the stock X1900XT heatsink didn't have heatpipes.
http://www.tomshardware.com/20...e_cooler_roundup_2006/
"There are no heat pipes in this cooler; it uses simple copper fins to dissipate heat."
Hello! If you take the plastic cover off of the cooler you can see two small heatpipes that are built into the base of the cooler! I pointed it out to the guy that did the review and he didn't feel it was worth mentioning. Wake up, at least have a clue what you are talking about.
It's quite true that AMD has had cpus with unlocked multis for some time. What you fail to mention is that they were charging a lot for those cpus. Now they are offering one at under $130 that can reach 3.1Ghz at default voltage. Definately worth a review for dollar minded people.
Originally posted by: perdomot
It's quite true that AMD has had cpus with unlocked multis for some time. What you fail to mention is that they were charging a lot for those cpus. Now they are offering one at under $130 that can reach 3.1Ghz at default voltage. Definately worth a review for dollar minded people.
Originally posted by: 21stHermit
My mother used to have a favorite saying, you'd do well to consider it:
"If you don't have anything nice to say . . . Don't say anything at all"
You've made a least a half-dozen posts in this thread, all negative. Do you really hate yourself that much? Please find another thread to spread your hate!!!
Hermit
Originally posted by: bryanW1995
I think that the article was written for the typical tom's reader. That sort of article makes sense over there because they would rather spend $130 for a marginal upgrade to their current system instead of $200 (after selling their current am2 mobo) to double the performance of their system. It goes without saying that most AT readers would go with B.
Originally posted by: Markfw900
Exactly ! Tom's has a bullseye painted on their head for creating reviews like that. I have to say it again, its was so stupid (my quote):
"First, They OC the X2 5000+ to 3.4 (max OC) and then compare to a stock 6550@2.33, when it could also hit 3.4 and wipe the floor with the black edition ? What a moronic review. "
Sorry, I can't help it, it really is the dumbest thing I have seen even them do in a long time....
So with such a target, why even bother insulting anyone here ?
