Nemesis 1
Lifer
- Dec 30, 2006
- 11,366
- 2
- 0
Some of the expectations were ridiculous. I remember someone on the Hardocp forums claimed it would be 71% faster than or 6870, or around 25% faster than 580, just because it had 71% more SPs than the 6870 (1920 vs 1120). And then we had people here talk for pages about the new VLIW4 architecture and how it would lead to 50% improvement in performance over Cypress.
So are you saying it isn't. How many games were benched. Lets throw a high powered cpu into the mix. I think AT had one game were it had pretty big differance. Yes I know you have to go by whats been shown . I seldom O/C a gpu but always O/C the cpu to highest stable . Reviewers really can't do that . As they have to bench for the masses, When ya start talking about O/C cpu/gpu your getting into differant perspectives trhan what reviewers do . I seen some of these reviews had O/Ced cpus and their numbers come up differantly. This is a brand new tech for AMD let them tune the drivers a bit more. Well those people who seen and believed that false shader number were fooled into thinking higher performance . Rightly so. But AMD still has alot of driver work to do.
Perspective is everthing . I legally blind in left eye . went to a 3D movie when I was young . I couldn't see anything 3D. So I never looked at anything 3D again thinking I couldn't see it because of my left eye . Last week I took my grandson see a movie done with intel InTru 3D . It was amazing I couldn't believe . My grandson kept saying did you see that . I said YA laughing as I said it . I really enjoyed it very much . As were leaving he said grandpa we got to come and see more of these . I said I will take you to all of them that mom and dad say you can go to . I changed my view of 3D because I now see it in a differant perspective,
