AMD 64 X2 - what's the "best" core?

[ValuedCustomer]

I'm sure this has been covered before but after scanning 8 pages and using the search function I don't see another thread. anywho..


I'm starting to put together a system for moderate+ gaming, surfing, music, etc.. not building a hot-rod mind you but I'd like it to be robust and I don't wanna have to replace it in a year and a half. -- what's your preference in regards to X2s?

 

[crossrode]

Clawhammer is not dual core, but avoid it. As far as the best core, didn't AMD just come out with their 45nm core? I'd give that a try.

 

[crossrode]

I meant 65nm here

Die shrinkage of the transistors themselves=more transistors being used=faster, more efficient processors.

 

[Smartazz]

Originally posted by: crossrode
I meant 65nm here

Die shrinkage of the transistors themselves=more transistors being used=faster, more efficient processors.

Not the case with these cores actually from what I've heard. The Windsors can overclock pretty well sometimes, at least 2.7GHZ usually AFAIK.
edit: As far as overclocking goes. If he plans not to overclock, then I agree with u Crossrode, it would be good to get the 65nm as it does use less energy.

 

[ValuedCustomer]

not gonna overclock - thanks very much for yall's advice! :beer:

 

[Smartazz]

I would recommend going with the core with the least watts. I think that one Windsor has a TDP of 35watts, look around on newegg. It's the X2 3800+ AM2.

 

[lobbyone]

Manchester/Toledo = S939
Brisbane/Windsor = AM2