AMD 64 OC Blog

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

akshayt

Banned
Feb 13, 2004
2,227
0
0
What I have done within a few days is more than enough to become a master in AMD 64 overclocking. Anything over that comes under hardocre overclocking which I clearly said I am not well versed with.

Please read all my sections and tell me what others have and I don't.
Then tell me what I have mentioned while others haven't.
Then tell me what I have explained better and easier to understand than others have.
Then tell me have I made any mistake or not, or is the guide not of use to noobs.
Finally, tell me if a better overclocking guide for complete noobs exists on AMD 64 or not.

You will yourself realize, what mean to say.
 

996GT2

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2005
5,212
0
76
The fact is that most of your guide is taken from what Zebo's posted in this forum...and you have made no mention of him at all in the blog. It does not matter how "good" or "masterful" it is, it's still mostly someone else's property that has not been given credit to. I don't know about where you live, but in the U.S.A. that's called PLAGERISM.
 

akshayt

Banned
Feb 13, 2004
2,227
0
0
No it is not taken from his, yes differentiation and integration is same to a limit. But the other things are not taken from his. Please point out what specifically has been taken from his thread, please tell me.
 

imported_inspire

Senior member
Jun 29, 2006
986
0
0
I typed a paragraph about the format.

That's beside the point, though. If it's well-differentiated from Zebo's guide, then what do you have to lose by citing his guide as a source?

Wouldn't you think it would save you the aggravation of dealing with the folks here and lend a more professional look to your blog if you cited your sources?
 

fbrdphreak

Lifer
Apr 17, 2004
17,555
1
0
Originally posted by: akshayt
What I have done within a few days is more than enough to become a master in AMD 64 overclocking. Anything over that comes under hardocre overclocking which I clearly said I am not well versed with.

Please read all my sections and tell me what others have and I don't.
Then tell me what I have mentioned while others haven't.
Then tell me what I have explained better and easier to understand than others have.
Then tell me have I made any mistake or not, or is the guide not of use to noobs.
Finally, tell me if a better overclocking guide for complete noobs exists on AMD 64 or not.

You will yourself realize, what mean to say.
Right.

So tell me again, how much does your X1900XT suck?

The only thing you are a master of is writing English poorly.
 

996GT2

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2005
5,212
0
76
Originally posted by: fbrdphreak
Originally posted by: akshayt
What I have done within a few days is more than enough to become a master in AMD 64 overclocking. Anything over that comes under hardocre overclocking which I clearly said I am not well versed with.

Please read all my sections and tell me what others have and I don't.
Then tell me what I have mentioned while others haven't.
Then tell me what I have explained better and easier to understand than others have.
Then tell me have I made any mistake or not, or is the guide not of use to noobs.
Finally, tell me if a better overclocking guide for complete noobs exists on AMD 64 or not.

You will yourself realize, what mean to say.
Right.

So tell me again, how much does your X1900XT suck?

The only thing you are a master of is writing English poorly.

LOL, not to mention he hasn't actually showed us (nor the ppl at Techenclave that almost banned him) pics of his "SUCKY" 1900XTX
 

akshayt

Banned
Feb 13, 2004
2,227
0
0
1)TE has been proved that I have bought the card. Go ask them.

2)I have updated my rig to thank Zebo for his concept and I have mentioned that.
 

imported_inspire

Senior member
Jun 29, 2006
986
0
0
Originally posted by: akshayt
2)I have updated my rig to thank Zebo for his concept and I have mentioned that.

That's good, but, unless I'm blind, you'd hadn't mentioned that. Good luck with your blog.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
12,789
9,950
136
The bit about being a "master in AMD 64 overclocking" made me laugh. Good stuff. Ban. Not just for this, just the icing on the cake.
 

imported_inspire

Senior member
Jun 29, 2006
986
0
0
Originally posted by: 996GT2
Wow inspire, you are just too nice :)

Well, I'm not savvy on the history between a lot of you guys and the OP, so I'm really just minding my own business and trying not to get caught in the middle this. :D
 

akshayt

Banned
Feb 13, 2004
2,227
0
0
I have mentioned that in the Differentiation and Integration post, and that is the only concept which has been based on his findings. All the resta are in no way related to him so I have not thanked him for the other posts.

Please see the blog again.
 

buzzsaw13

Diamond Member
Apr 30, 2004
3,814
0
76
Originally posted by: akshayt
What I have done within a few days is more than enough to become a master in AMD 64 overclocking. Anything over that comes under hardocre overclocking which I clearly said I am not well versed with.

Please read all my sections and tell me what others have and I don't.
Then tell me what I have mentioned while others haven't.
Then tell me what I have explained better and easier to understand than others have.
Then tell me have I made any mistake or not, or is the guide not of use to noobs.
Finally, tell me if a better overclocking guide for complete noobs exists on AMD 64 or not.

You will yourself realize, what mean to say.

LOL, getting 300mhz out of your 3200+ Winchester hardly makes you a "master of AMD 64 overclocking"
 

myocardia

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2003
9,291
30
91
Originally posted by: Pens1566
The bit about being a "master in AMD 64 overclocking" made me laugh. Good stuff. Ban. Not just for this, just the icing on the cake.
Yeah, if I were a moderator here, he'd get a long vacation, so he could think about what it means to take something that isn't yours.

Originally posted by: buzzsaw13
LOL, getting 300mhz out of your 3200+ Winchester hardly makes you a "master of AMD 64 overclocking"
A complete newbie, like asshat, getting a 300 Mhz overclock from any A64 isn't rare at all. It's actually on the low side, as a matter of fact. And asshat, here's how you quote someone, and link back to the original:



Originally posted by: 996GT2
Damnit, can an admin just ban him please?
posted here: link to your original attempt at overclocking, a total of 4 days ago
 

akshayt

Banned
Feb 13, 2004
2,227
0
0
I have done 2.4 on 1.45V. more than this my cpu doesn't allow, that doesn't make me insufficient, just that I got a bad piece.

My cpu doesn't even boot at 240fsb at 1.4V, with 1.425 it boots, but fails 3d mark, at 1.4375 it fails gaming, I need to keep it to 1.45V.

How much you can overclock doesn't necessarily make you a master. How many techniques you can try and actually explain to someone else makes you one.
For noob overclocking there is no better guide than what I have given, I have used simple yet explained language and each thing has been simply put. I never said that I am the best at overclocking nor did I say that hardcore overclockers should read my guide. But those who haven't ever overclocked, if they only read my guide they will be better prepared and more confident to overclock than what if they had read any other guide. Zebo's guide imo is not that easy on complete noobs just as I felt after I had initially read it. It also takes more time to implement. Mine is a short cut methord to guesstimate the max possible with your CPU.

At the moment I don't want to go very high because my TTBH hasn't arrived and my motherboard doesn't go beyond 1.55 and anything over 1.5 is a little risky for CPUs.

 

Smoove910

Golden Member
Aug 2, 2006
1,235
6
81
Is it me, or is it getting deep in here??? Hell, I've been overclocking since the Pentium 3 days and I still don't consider myself a master overclocker... even if I do have an Opty 148 with a 600mhz overclock.

Akshayt, from reading this thread I will offer this simple piece of advise... SHUTUP!
 

Stumps

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
7,125
0
0
Bah hahaha only 300mhz from a 3200+ I wouldn't call that much of an overclock at all...I got over 800mhz from my 3000+(E6 SKT 754)@2.87Ghz at the low voltage of 1.5V(really 1.52v my mobo overvolts a bit).

I have been overclocking since my early 486 days (1992) nothing like turning a 486DX2/50 into a DX2/66 for a super overclock, and I still have heaps to learn on the subject, hell I've been using watercooling since 2001 and still have a long way to go before I come up with a "perfect" system for my PC's.

I think the only ones who really can cliam to be masters of overclocking are those crazy buggers who use N20 and other exotic cooling techniques to get super overclocks.
 

Beiruty

Senior member
Jun 14, 2005
282
0
0
This thread is waste of e-ink. Please delete. With my 3200+ I was able to OC to 2375Mhz with 1:1 Memory at 250 Mhz with 4-3-3-7-2T in under 10 mins.

What you need to do:
1) learn about the limits of your Motherboard, CPU, RAM..... you ask me how? "Hello, can you spell *google*?"
2) Do not expect miricales, HW does what it can and be greatful!
3) For noobs, have you heard about ntune?

BTW, Mr. Master OC from India, what was the Multiplier I uesd in above OC? :D
 

akshayt

Banned
Feb 13, 2004
2,227
0
0
1) I said master of noob overclocking and not master of overclocking.
2) If I could do 3GHz out of my winchester that doesn't make me a master, jut that my chip doesn't oc that much, is that my fault.
3)Find a better oc guide and then speak, better guide for noob overclocking that is, not for hardcore ocers or experience overclockers.

if you run your ram at 4-3-3-7 there is a chance that your performance would anyway be crap.

ntune is crap and not good enough for any overclocking, noos need to learn and you need to start somewhere and this is the best place to start
 

Beiruty

Senior member
Jun 14, 2005
282
0
0
I read your blog and I do believe that the steps are so confusing and you are asking for trouble:

In "Tune and Test" there is nothing worse than your statement:
I quote:" Once you feel that the voltage is high enough...."

How a noob will feel what a overvolting is high enough?

Enough said. Have a real job!
 

Stumps

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
7,125
0
0
Originally posted by: akshayt
1) I said master of noob overclocking and not master of overclocking.
2) If I could do 3GHz out of my winchester that doesn't make me a master, jut that my chip doesn't oc that much, is that my fault.
3)Find a better oc guide and then speak, better guide for noob overclocking that is, not for hardcore ocers or experience overclockers.

if you run your ram at 4-3-3-7 there is a chance that your performance would anyway be crap.

ntune is crap and not good enough for any overclocking, noos need to learn and you need to start somewhere and this is the best place to start

only having an overclock running for a week doesn't make you a master of any kind..maybe if your OC had of been a decent OC (2.5/2.6ghz) you could say that you are good at overclocking...but only a 300mhz increase...I got more than that out of my old Athlon T-bird 1.4ghz back in 2001 and it was aircooled(I didn't need a heater the whole time I ran that CPU in my PC).

I would say that OC is pretty mediocre at best, personally I wouldn't have even bothered with it and left it running stock...that small increase isn't worth the hassle and would barely make a difference in any benchmarks or games...all you are doing is reducing your CPU's life span without any real benifits.
 

akshayt

Banned
Feb 13, 2004
2,227
0
0
What do I do if my CPU can't manage more than 400mhz. Visit my house and make it do more than 400mhz at 1.45v, then speak. Each chip has a limit, a good chip may easily do 2.6 while a bad chip may struggle even at 2.3.

1)Forget about mastering, is the blog helpful or not, for noobs?
2)beirty, thanks for pointing out that, I will edit it.

Now you understand what a blog is, if I by mistake did make a mistake, then point it out for me to correct. Let me see how many mistakes can you find
 

buzzsaw13

Diamond Member
Apr 30, 2004
3,814
0
76
Originally posted by: akshayt
1) I said master of noob overclocking and not master of overclocking.
2) If I could do 3GHz out of my winchester that doesn't make me a master, jut that my chip doesn't oc that much, is that my fault.
3)Find a better oc guide and then speak, better guide for noob overclocking that is, not for hardcore ocers or experience overclockers.

if you run your ram at 4-3-3-7 there is a chance that your performance would anyway be crap.

ntune is crap and not good enough for any overclocking, noos need to learn and you need to start somewhere and this is the best place to start

I have found a better guide for noobs, the guide that Zebo wrote. The guide that you blatantly stole from.