They aren't calling for bannage just because of this, this is icing on the cake.Originally posted by: inspire
As for bannage, I wouldn't jump the gun. However, if anyone is ballsy enough to start a blog based on information they obtained from someone else on the forum and to refuse to acknowlege their sources and, finally, to advertise it in the same forum, that person is a serious candidate for bannage.
Originally posted by: fbrdphreak
They aren't calling for bannage just because of this, this is icing on the cake.Originally posted by: inspire
As for bannage, I wouldn't jump the gun. However, if anyone is ballsy enough to start a blog based on information they obtained from someone else on the forum and to refuse to acknowlege their sources and, finally, to advertise it in the same forum, that person is a serious candidate for bannage.
Originally posted by: BlingBlingArsch
noone is gonna visit his little blog anyways...so, relax.
Originally posted by: keeleysam
Originally posted by: BlingBlingArsch
noone is gonna visit his little blog anyways...so, relax.
It is still plagiarism.
Originally posted by: Crusader
Originally posted by: keeleysam
Originally posted by: BlingBlingArsch
noone is gonna visit his little blog anyways...so, relax.
It is still plagiarism.
Is it copyrighted? Is it covered over international law and boundries?
Originally posted by: Crusader
Originally posted by: keeleysam
Originally posted by: BlingBlingArsch
noone is gonna visit his little blog anyways...so, relax.
It is still plagiarism.
Is it copyrighted? Is it covered over international law and boundries?
I'm looking into that now, but I'm almost positive that it's a violation of U.S. law. I'll post back once I've found out.Originally posted by: Crusader
Originally posted by: keeleysam
Originally posted by: BlingBlingArsch
noone is gonna visit his little blog anyways...so, relax.
It is still plagiarism.
Is it copyrighted? Is it covered over international law and boundries?
Originally posted by: myocardia
Okay, here are some links about plagiarism on the internet: link #1, link #2, link #3. As you can see, in this instance, state law dominates, instead of federal law. So, whether or not it is even illegal depends on the state that akshayt lives in, if he even lives in the U.S. at all. If he doesn't, it's definitely not illegal, since only one or two countries worldwide have laws against plagiarizing things that originated, or were copyrighted, in the U.S. That's one of the ways that they show how much they despise us, it seems.
edit: It seems that Airtel DSL service is in India: link to that, and India has absolutely no laws against stealing intellectual property, or anything else, from the U.S.
I'm not sure whether he's ever said where he lives, but if he isn't lying on his profile about who he has his DSL through, he lives in India, as you can see from the Airtel DSL link in my last post.Originally posted by: Tarrant64
Where is the OP???
Who said anything about blogspot, besides you?Originally posted by: keeleysam
blogspot is not based in India. It's where the server lies, not the user.
Originally posted by: akshayt
You guys are incompetent.