Did anyone project the revenues from Amazon?
Yes there’s all sorts of fiscal analysis on this around.
Did anyone project the revenues from Amazon?
Can you explain how the treasury would be raided?
The situation here was (using a simple example) instead of paying $10 in taxes Amazon would pay $5. That's the subsidy given. It was not 'New York pays Amazon $5.' The treasury would still get money, just not as much as it would otherwise.
I totally get being opposed to that too but we should be clear on what is happening.
They shouldn't get special tax treatment that other local businesses don't get, just because of their size and political power. Americans are going through a populist period precisely because they are sick and tired of big corporations rigging the government in their favor, and Amazon was completely tone deaf to it with their entire HQ2 freak show. Them throwing a tantrum and storming out just because some local politicians said mean things about them is just icing on the cake.
For the last time dipshit - WE AGREE on that.
That still doesn't take away from the fact that it was an overall incredibly stupid move for NY.
I think it's a good outcome all around, except landlords.
Amazon should set up more smaller offices around the country instead of trying to jam 25000 new employees into an area with limited real estate.
This implies that New York City/State would have a net loss in revenues from Amazon's relocation. I have seen no analysis anywhere that says such a thing.
If it's not a net loss of revenues, nobody's cutting them a check.
For the last time dipshit - WE AGREE on that.
That still doesn't take away from the fact that it was an overall incredibly stupid move for NY.
For Amazon, long accustomed to highly deferential treatment from localities across the country, the phone call was a further indignity after weeks of relentless criticism from lawmakers, unions and progressive activists that the company feared was staining its reputation.
On Thursday, Amazon abruptly announced that it was canceling the deal, under which the company had promised to create more than 25,000 jobs on a new campus in Long Island City, Queens, in return for nearly $3 billion in government incentives.
An examination of the deal’s collapse showed that Amazon badly misjudged how it would be received in New York, apparently because the company has rarely ventured into such a raucous political arena as it has pursued a breakneck expansion in recent years.
Amazon can deliver toothpaste in traffic-snarled Manhattan on the same day an order is placed. But when it came to navigating the politics of New York, the company appeared out of step, a giant stumbling onto a political stage that — despite its data-driven success — it never fully understood.
“Amazon underestimated the power of a vocal minority and miscalculated how much it needed to engage with those audiences to make HQ2 a success,” Joseph Parilla, a fellow at the Brookings Institution, said, referring to the second headquarters search.
The company, in particular, failed to develop a robust strategy to address the growing influence of the progressive left in New York, led by Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of Queens, who was elected in November and was a fervent skeptic of the deal.
This is a sheepish argument.Is that your expert business advise? Amazing how you know what to do better than all those people working at Amazon.
That's where top tech talent wants to live, even if it costs them a lot. Maybe red cities and states should look in the mirror and ask why, instead of being salty about it.Between, NYC, AOC, and Seattle's attempt at an Amazon tax, Amazon must be feeling great about doing business in blue cities and states.
This is a sheepish argument.
Besides, even they are now saying they don't plan to rebid second HQ2 and will hire throughout the country instead, which is good for everyone involved, except NY landlords.
This is a sheepish argument.
Besides, even they are now saying they don't plan to rebid second HQ2 and will hire throughout the country instead, which is good for everyone involved, except NY landlords.
How is it sheepish. You just gave business advise to Amazon about things you know very little about. Consolidating operations can be far more efficient depending on the situation. Its why cities are generally vastly more efficient.
NY has a high population density already.Sounds like New York should fix its housing policy then, not chase away tens of thousands of high paying jobs.
NY has a high population density already.
1) it’s not her district.
2) her support or opposition had nothing to do with this decision.
Why are conservatives so obsessed with this lady?
I’m obsessed with her because she’s the hottest member of Congress by far.
Usually I don't do this but... advise is not the same as advice. One's a verb, the other a noun.
Sounds like you agree with me that the best use of land, which Amazon was going to use to add more office space and increase housing demand, is to instead build residential units and increase housing supply.Clearly not nearly high enough, considering the demand. Houses are expensive because the demand exceeds the supply. It is common sense to create more supply.
If you really want the landlords to get theirs then make more houses, it will decrease their rents.
Sounds like you agree with me that the best use of land, which Amazon was going to use to add more office space and increase housing demand, is to instead build residential units and increase housing supply.
I agree they should zone for residential, not more office space.There are tons of places to build houses in New York. The problem is zoning, not lack of places to build.
