Am I the only one who thinks that UT/UT2003 is dumb?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

oLLie

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2001
5,203
1
0
Originally posted by: Maggotry
Originally posted by: ElFenix
(anyone played IG BR? that is insane!)

What is IGBR?

InstaGib ButtReaming

I think InstaGib is right... although I don't know what InstaGib is, I've never played UT.
 

dawks

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,071
2
81
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Please tell me this is nothing more than a pathetic rant by a sniveling little Carmack worshipper who can't accept the fact that UT was a superior game to Q3.

Q3 is a far superior game. But everyone has their own opinion.

The Q3 engine is MUCH MUCH better, but UT/UT 2003 doesnt have much of a chance considering its based on D3D.. OpenGL owns :) The Unreal engine wasnt coded very well, if you dont believe me, check the benchmarks from aways back. They were very erratic.

Plus, Carmack and the iD crew could probably retire right now and just live off the revenue the Q3 engine is bringing in right now.

UT 2003 is ALOT like UT.. Just fancier graphics, updated models and guns.. still the same boring old game IMO.
 

Maggotry

Platinum Member
Dec 5, 2001
2,074
0
0
I think InstaGib is right... although I don't know what InstaGib is, I've never played UT.
Oh. BR must mean "bombing run". I don't like InstaGib. Actually, I don't like mutators in general, especially Low Gravity. I agree with some that UT2 is just a pretty, polished UT. That's basically true. But, I still love it and I still really don't like Q3! I'd rather play any UT game than any Quake game.

 

bauerbrazil

Senior member
Mar 21, 2000
359
0
0
Q3 sux, a game with just 2 good weapons, rail and rocket, this is stupid. In UT every weapon are good.
 

B00ne

Platinum Member
May 21, 2001
2,168
1
0
Well I think I like it - it finally feels like Q3 which is a good thing.
The original UT didnt survive more than 2hrs on my HD.

Finally they have large, spinning bobing weapons that are easy to distinguish. Finally the physics seems more like Q3, finally the graphics are pleasing and close to Q3 (well actually better but somehow Q3-like, except for the artwork). Framerates are pretty good considering the visuals - something that could not be said about Unreal as well as UT.

Still not to my liking: second weapon function, autoaim on RL, RL loadable with several rockets, no RJ, little knocking/airtime on rocket impact, the Biorifle - maybe they could incorporate some new config: "never pick up weapon x..."

havent played it online yet, because ASE dont have no support (yet)
 

BillGates

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2001
7,388
2
81
Originally posted by: UDT89
with a name like bill gates i expect this thread

I'm really not sure where the corrolation is, whatsoever. I am hoping you were drunk when you thought that witty retort up.

P.S. - Thanks for adding something valuable to the discussion.
 

SaltBoy

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2001
8,975
11
81
Originally posted by: DaZ
UT 2003 is ALOT like UT.. Just fancier graphics, updated models and guns.. still the same boring old game IMO.

True enough, but it has one more thing that UT didn't have -- the "NFL Films" music! :)
 

Rent

Diamond Member
Aug 8, 2000
7,127
1
81
Its just another shooter.

However, it has its own niche in the community. Its fast and easy to play so a lot of people are going to like it.

I honestly don't care what weapons are in it. The gameplay is good and thats why I play.
 

smp

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2000
5,215
0
76
What does it mean when you've installed the demo and it tells you when you try to start it that you need dx8.1b .. when you have 8.1b ??
I even installed the latest patch and that didn't fix it either.
win2k here
 

BillGates

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2001
7,388
2
81
Originally posted by: smp
What does it mean when you've installed the demo and it tells you when you try to start it that you need dx8.1b .. when you have 8.1b ??
I even installed the latest patch and that didn't fix it either.
win2k here

I had some problems with with my Win2k/GF3 freezing up - the demo patch fixed that though.
 

Maverick

Diamond Member
Jun 14, 2000
5,900
0
76
Originally posted by: bauerbrazil
Q3 sux, a game with just 2 good weapons, rail and rocket, this is stupid. In UT every weapon are good.

except for the booger shooter...does anyone actually use that gun?
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
except for the booger shooter...does anyone actually use that gun?
I'll use it over the assault rifle or the lightning gun. A fully charged shot of that can kill someone with full shield.
 

TomC25

Platinum Member
Oct 12, 1999
2,120
0
0
Originally posted by: Deeko
except for the booger shooter...does anyone actually use that gun?
I'll use it over the assault rifle or the lightning gun. A fully charged shot of that can kill someone with full shield.


yep

it is also good to shoot at the floor in front of someone chasing you around a corner, though it is a cheap shot not needing accuracy
 

AdamK47

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,844
3,632
136
I use to use the bio rifle in the original Unreal because the AI would walk right over the globs. In UT it's not worth using. In UT 2003 it's much more powerful and can be used at short range with great results. The secondary fire will destroy anyone. Just don't get too close.