Originally posted by: dmw16
Am I the only one that thinks that above ground pools are a little bit white trash? This guy in my office goes on and on about how great his above ground pool is and he drives me crazy in general and this is just another thing. Seriously, they are just an overgrown baby pool.
Originally posted by: NightDarker
Originally posted by: CPA
Originally posted by: NightDarker
In ground pools are where its at.
If I ever decide I absolutley HAVE to get a pool, I'll spend the extra $15000 on a real pool.
$15000? are you kidding me. Double that for anything decent.
I'm not kidding anyone$15k would get you a pretty freaking nice pool.
true.Originally posted by: Mr Pickles
Originally posted by: meltdown75
i just wanted to imagine this funky above ground pool with ramps built all the way around it so you could ride your BMX up the ramp and do a wicked kickflip into the waterOriginally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: meltdown75
you build a deck on one side of it... you don't need ramps around the whole pool. lol n00b
You didn't understand what I said at all, but FDF did so I blame you.
You can't kickflip a bike.
i was quoted $eleventy billion for a 16 x 32 pool. no word of a lie.Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: NightDarker
In ground pools are where its at.
If I ever decide I absolutley HAVE to get a pool, I'll spend the extra $15000 on a real pool.
extra $15k? You realize this is really just going to be an above ground pool mounted under the grade.
A real in-ground (concrete) pool usually starts at $30k, I know for a complete 15x30ish custom shaped pool I was quoted around $50k by a few vendors.
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Approximate costs for a 16x32 pool:
inground:
Steel wall+vinyl side: $17,000
Gunite: $37,000
Above ground:
metal wall oval: $2000
soft side rectangular: $4000
...and that is for a large pool, round ones are much cheaper.
Edit:
my point: inground pools are nice and all, but you're comparing a Scion TC to an Aston Martin Vantage price wise.
Originally posted by: trmiv
Depends how it's installed. The house my parents bought a couple of years ago came with an above ground pool, but it is completely surrounded by a huge deck. Since the house has a crawl space, the pool and deck are level with the back of the house.
They did have an in-ground pool that they had installed at their old house. I think it was like $20,000 to $25,000.
Originally posted by: FDF12389
Above ground pool with a nice large deck, nothing wrong with that.
Originally posted by: Glitchny
Originally posted by: FDF12389
Above ground pool with a nice large deck, nothing wrong with that.
I agree with this. A couple people I know have a raised deck that comes off their house so that the pool is actually sunken all the way to the ground underneath and the water is at deck level. Unless you go under the deck you dont even see that it is "above ground"
Originally posted by: FDF12389
Above ground pool with a nice large deck, nothing wrong with that.
Originally posted by: Mr Pickles
I saw a commercial for an above-ground pool, it was 30 seconds long. Because that's the maximum amount of time you can picture yourself having fun in an above-ground pool. If it was 31 seconds, the actor would say "The water is only up to here? What do I do now? Throw the ball back to Jimmy? Or put some goggles on and look at his feet?"
- Mitch Hedberg
Originally posted by: GRIFFIN1
Above the ground pools are much easier to set on the curb when you realize that all you do is clean the thing and no one ever swims in it.
Originally posted by: dmw16
Am I the only one that thinks that above ground pools are a little bit white trash? This guy in my office goes on and on about how great his above ground pool is and he drives me crazy in general and this is just another thing. Seriously, they are just an overgrown baby pool.
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: GRIFFIN1
Above the ground pools are much easier to set on the curb when you realize that all you do is clean the thing and no one ever swims in it.
LOL...so true. If you have an inground pool, you need to have a few tons of dirt dumped in the hole. And now you're out $20K.
Originally posted by: TheFamilyMan
Originally posted by: NightDarker
Originally posted by: CPA
Originally posted by: NightDarker
In ground pools are where its at.
If I ever decide I absolutley HAVE to get a pool, I'll spend the extra $15000 on a real pool.
$15000? are you kidding me. Double that for anything decent.
I'm not kidding anyone$15k would get you a pretty freaking nice pool.
18K will get you an 18 x 36 in-ground, concrete and vinyl pool with 5ft of concrete on the perimeter for chairs and whatnot. The system is salt-water and low maintenance. It even comes with the Polaris cleaning system...for an extra 2k or so you can get a jacuzzi with infinity edge built in to one end of the pool that also serves as a 'waterfall' of sorts...very nice setup...
I know because that's what we're having built...
Originally posted by: mpitts
Originally posted by: Mr Pickles
I saw a commercial for an above-ground pool, it was 30 seconds long. Because that's the maximum amount of time you can picture yourself having fun in an above-ground pool. If it was 31 seconds, the actor would say "The water is only up to here? What do I do now? Throw the ball back to Jimmy? Or put some goggles on and look at his feet?"
- Mitch Hedberg
I was fully expecting this to be one of the first five responses to the thread.![]()
no. ponds are for frogs, fish and lilies. frozen ponds are for hockey.Originally posted by: PingSpike
You should just dig a hole and put in a pond instead. Cheaper, you don't have to clean it, and you'll probably swim in it just as often as you would have swam in the pool.
I guess if you're in florida you have more then a month and a half to swim in the pool though. And you don't have to cover it and get it ready every spring. And the water probably isn't -400C most of the time.
