Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: OdiN
Originally posted by: ShawnD1
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Access = IT hell
Fixed.
If you want major data problems, set a bunch of undertrained people to use MS Access or something equivalent. Stuff will be indexed wrong, the fields will be the wrong type, the queries won't make any sense, and you'll spend a great deal of time trying to figure out what stuff means.
Excel is redundant, but it's very straight-forward. You have to be a retard to screw it up.
Wrong. I use Acces and Excel extensively here at work.
With Access....why would you EVER allow a user any sort of access to fields or queries, etc. They should see forms only, period. You shouldn't have to figure out what stuff means because you should be the one who puts it there. I develop Access-based applications used in many business processes here. There really isn't any need for anything else.
Excel is great and has some amazing functionality.
SAP is horrid. I HATE SAP!
The problem with Access is some script monkey writes a little DB to keep track of the widgets in his department. He then tells everyone in the dept. about it, and they get all excited. 12 months later the person is gone, but the DB is growing into some mutant from hell, poorly coded and with no real structure, all of a sudden, it blows up and the department head comes to IT, demanding it be fixed. Sorry, unsupported DB, contact the programmer.![]()
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Correct. I have been implementing and supporting Oracle systems for over ten years. Oracle absolutely sucks for reporting and data exporting.
It's a lot less expensive and time consuming a lot of times to just perform a data dump from the database and manipulate it using Excel than it is to have a developer build a custom report or interface.
Where crap in a can reports failed me was taking data and being able to slice charts by specific groupings of finance contracts. Static pool analysis.
Essentially you group contracts of similar types, say by FICO score buckets (450-500 FICO score, 500-550) when they were originated in a certain year (2007). Then matching those buckets and contracts to contracts that defaulted. I needed to know when they defaulted and be able to come up with the %. This also needed to be manipulated so that I can look at the base %'s, not just a pretty chart.
The warehouse and query tool were great for bulk processing, such as determining which contracts fit into the buckets, or when/how the contracts defaulted. However, it utterly failed when trying to combine the numerator (defaulted contract bucket) with the denominator (origination volume bucket).
When it came down to it, they just couldn't match up originations separated out by so many buckets. I had to have this data by FICO, original term length, origination year...etc.
Complex analysis and usage of data for modeling is impossible in ERP systems. When it comes down to it, that type of stuff is just too customized and complicated.
Originally posted by: AmpedSilence
Originally posted by: Ns1
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Ns1
Originally posted by: Train
Originally posted by: Ns1
We have a client that can't export ANYTHING out of their accounting/"ERP" software into excel. I hate them.
Are you kidding, ANYTHING can be imported into excel. Tell them to give you a .txt and set up excel to parse it.
They can't export to .csv. They can't export to .xls. They still use goddamn dot matrix printers.
Last time they sent us a file I had to setup crystal reports to get useful data out of it.
Their firewall is so locked down, they can't send OR receive pdf's and excel files.
I hate them to the max. This is a 30 million dollar company that wants to grow to a 50m company.
I suppose all they can give you are fixed field layout files?
Better: they give me huge reams of 500+ papers in dot matrix binders. they still have that shit ribbon on the side and are still connected to each other. I once had to "split" 300 documents so I could feed them into the ADF in the copier and make copies.
This was like, 6 months ago, not 15 fucking years ago.
**head assplodes**
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Excel plus Access = IT hell
![]()
Originally posted by: cw42
I don't understand how people can handle 15,000pg excel docs with 140 worksheets...
Originally posted by: fire400
Get a reality check.
Fortune 500/1K companies must know how to use Microsoft Excel software, does that mean "everything" runs on it? No.
Are you going to use soley Microsoft Excel on a 64-processor MONARCH computer? Get your facts straight.
Originally posted by: Descartes
You speak the truth. As others have already added, Access definitely belongs in that category.
It really is impressive how inefficiently some companies are run, be it with Excel, Access, etc. I've spent most of my career simultaneously thankful and frustrated by it.