• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Alien experiment - eliminate half the population

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Which half of the population do you ELIMINATE?

  • Oldest

  • Youngest

  • Wealthiest

  • Poorest

  • Most Attractive

  • Least Attractive

  • Healthiest

  • Least Healthy

  • Most Intelligent

  • Least Intelligent


Results are only viewable after voting.
I guess the Oldest....hopefully we've learned all we need from them, already.

So many pitfalls in each category.

My thinking is that in all categories--including health/intelligence/attractiveness--we lose substantial amounts of important genetic information.

Taking out the oldest is probably the most diverse amongst all of those, so no real loss...uh, genetically.
 
You're missing one option. The one I'd pick. The fattest.
There are 7 billion people on Earth. As you're from one of the better fed western nations, it's quite likely that you're among the fattest 3.5 billion people. Meanwhile, there are 3.5 billion people who go to bed hungry many nights.

Um, who decides who is the least intelligent?
Well, if you don't know the answer to that question, then I suppose we know which group YOU'RE in.
 
I voted poorest, because they have the worst quality of life currently. If someone has to die let it be those who are suffering.
 
The lowest earners on the planet are suffering, the starving in africa etc, have one thing in common they are very poor.

god you have a fucked up brain.

if we're talking the bottom 50% not all of them are suffering. how do you know they do not enjoy their lives? stop projecting your world onto theirs. the only people you can say legitimately suffer are those who are unhealthy.
 
if we're talking the bottom 50% not all of them are suffering. how do you know they do not enjoy their lives? stop projecting your world onto theirs. the only people you can say legitimately suffer are those who are unhealthy.

They definitely like to fuck.
 
I went with oldest but I mean like the very elderly 70+...but I don't think that would represent half the population...second choice would be least intelligent...possibly speed up the evolution process
 
Gonna go with the poorest with the following logic that this group would comprise mostly of the following
- least intelligent cause if you're smart, you wouldn't be poor
- least healthy, cause if you smart, you should take better care of yourself and being smart mean you wouldn't be poor
- oldest(the rich old folks can stay), if you old and poor, you're prob in bad health and will go soon anyway
- least attractive, cause if you're ugly you better make up for it by being smart and rich
 
Gonna go with the poorest with the following logic that this group would comprise mostly of the following
- least intelligent cause if you're smart, you wouldn't be poor
- least healthy, cause if you smart, you should take better care of yourself and being smart mean you wouldn't be poor
- oldest(the rich old folks can stay), if you old and poor, you're prob in bad health and will go soon anyway
- least attractive, cause if you're ugly you better make up for it by being smart and rich
- Chris Langan
- many healthy people aren't that smart, and many smart people aren't that healthy. Gaping logical hole here.
- can't disagree too much, most old people are in poor health regardless of wealth though.
- lolwut?
 
I chose most attractive. I would become more attractive by comparison
(I misclicked)

If I'd choosen least intelligent, my IQ would fall 0,1 points 😉
 
Last edited:
Back
Top