- May 11, 2002
- 9,906
- 6,480
- 136
Lol! Dayum Girl AOC Take a bow!
She exposed something I already knew.
And the people who need to hear this are violently ignorant sycophants of the Trump Klan.
Not dead, just under the influence of money. We could kick the habit anytime we wanted to, but since some of that money goes to our favorite team, we won't.In short, democracy is dead.
Not dead, just under the influence of money. We could kick the habit anytime we wanted to, but since some of that money goes to our favorite team, we won't.
Incidentally, AOC needs to work on her public speaking and presentation skills. Obama or Gowdy would have done a much better job.
That's the thinking that will insure the issue goes nowhere. "You're to stupid to understand" isn't a compelling argument.Meh, she's leaps and bounds beyond what conservatives require, maybe she should ramble aimlessly and grab a few conservatives attention too.
That's the thinking that will insure the issue goes nowhere. "You're to stupid to understand" isn't a compelling argument.
Her speech made the point, but it was a high school level performance. On this particular issue, I completely agree with her, and I would like to have seen a better constructed and more compelling argument.
Describe the issue and it's ramifications, outline the solution, drive the point home, then ask why we don't want to do it. I want her to succeed.
That's the thinking that will insure the issue goes nowhere. "You're to stupid to understand" isn't a compelling argument.
Her speech made the point, but it was a high school level performance. On this particular issue, I completely agree with her, and I would like to have seen a better constructed and more compelling argument.
Describe the issue and it's ramifications, outline the solution, drive the point home, then ask why we don't want to do it. I want her to succeed.
That's the thinking that will insure the issue goes nowhere. "You're to stupid to understand" isn't a compelling argument.
Her speech made the point, but it was a high school level performance. On this particular issue, I completely agree with her, and I would like to have seen a better constructed and more compelling argument.
Describe the issue and it's ramifications, outline the solution, drive the point home, then ask why we don't want to do it. I want her to succeed.
Gowdy? Seriously? Did you hit your head on a rafter today?Not dead, just under the influence of money. We could kick the habit anytime we wanted to, but since some of that money goes to our favorite team, we won't.
Incidentally, AOC needs to work on her public speaking and presentation skills. Obama or Gowdy would have done a much better job.
Is the majority of a candidates expenditures on TV/radio/media ads?We need to focus on eliminating political ads, and if we did then money would be an afterthought.
I don't think you see the issue properly. If our democracy is under the influence of money then our democracy is nor only under the influence of money, it is also dead. A government that can be influenced by money is not a democracy. Influence by anything other than the will of the people on a government isn't democratic. You are just ignoring the fact that democracy is dead.Not dead, just under the influence of money. We could kick the habit anytime we wanted to, but since some of that money goes to our favorite team, we won't.
Incidentally, AOC needs to work on her public speaking and presentation skills. Obama or Gowdy would have done a much better job.
Don't forget corporations are people.Gowdy? Seriously? Did you hit your head on a rafter today?
USSC ruled money = speech, so we either need an amendment or a new supreme court to change that, and one side if very against that.
There are those who have questions as to whether it even matters. There is a loss of hope:That's the thinking that will insure the issue goes nowhere. "You're to stupid to understand" isn't a compelling argument.
Her speech made the point, but it was a high school level performance. On this particular issue, I completely agree with her, and I would like to have seen a better constructed and more compelling argument.
Describe the issue and it's ramifications, outline the solution, drive the point home, then ask why we don't want to do it. I want her to succeed.
There are those who have questions as to whether it even matters. There is a loss of hope:
https://www.vox.com/2019/2/4/18185383/millennials-capitalism-burned-out-malcolm-harris
Article makes good points. Based on their millennial year range, I make the cut.
I'm GenX.
I was born in '80. so sometimes I've seen GenX label and sometimes GenY, but now millenial
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennials