Alex Jones got spanked in court.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,017
2,859
136
  • Like
Reactions: Vic and JimKiler

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,029
48,001
136
A default judgment might actually be more cost effective for him than producing evidence.
Obviously none of us know what he's hiding but to lose multiple lawsuits of this size over it sure suggests whatever's there is very, very bad.
 
Nov 17, 2019
10,804
6,463
136
He can't be hiding anything because he doesn't have anything. He lost these cases because he didn't produce documents to back up his claims. Documents he can't produce because he doesn't have anything substantial to back up his frivolous claims.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,188
14,092
136
He can't be hiding anything because he doesn't have anything. He lost these cases because he didn't produce documents to back up his claims. Documents he can't produce because he doesn't have anything substantial to back up his frivolous claims.

No, he's hiding things. If you don't have documents which are requested, that is actually not your fault unless it can be proven that you destroyed evidence not helpful to you. All you have to do is have your attorneys serve a statement on the other side saying you don't have the requested documents.

The fact he was repeatedly sanctioned for not producing documents to the point where the court entered judgment for plaintiffs means he had documents he did not want to produce.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captante and Pohemi
Mar 11, 2004
23,074
5,557
146
He can't be hiding anything because he doesn't have anything. He lost these cases because he didn't produce documents to back up his claims. Documents he can't produce because he doesn't have anything substantial to back up his frivolous claims.

That's not at all what happened, not that you seem to give a shit considering how often you spout straight shit right out of your mouth on here.

It might be worth reminding you that his defense sent child porn to the persecution (think it was one of the other trials). If you think he's not hiding anything then you're a bigger goddamn moron than the people that believed his false flag/crisis actor shit.
 
Last edited:
Nov 17, 2019
10,804
6,463
136
Boy just don't learn none too good, do he?


Newtown families: Alex Jones fails to show up for deposition

abcnews.go.com.ico
ABC|41 minutes ago
Lawyers for relatives of Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting victims are asking a judge to order Infowars host Alex Jones to appear at a deposition and have him arrested if he doesn't
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,188
14,092
136
Yes, you can get someone cited for contempt of court after failing to appear for a deposition, after you first file a motion in court to compel attendance and the court orders an appearance on a date certain, then the deponent again fails to appear. In CA the penalty is usually 5 days jail time. But it can increase if the conduct continues afterwards.

I have no idea what Jones is thinking here, except that since he didn't produce documents in the other suit which caused him to lose the case by default, and he doesn't want to be deposed in this one, he is clearly hiding things. Why doesn't he just settle the case? Maybe he doesn't have the money to do so.

These plaintiffs will be chasing him around to enforce these judgments against him for years to come. They'll be attaching his bank accounts, liening his properties, and garnishing his wages for a long time. He's probably best off just going BK right now, him and Infowars as both have been sued.

My guess as to what he's hiding is documents which indicate that he never believed Sandy Hook was fake. The one thing he cannot tolerate is his fans finding out that he's been conning them for these past 20 years.
 
Last edited:

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,275
10,783
136
In Connecticut law "failure to appear" in a criminal case at least is a charge all by itself and the severity follows the charge in the original arrest. ("A" misdemeanor -or- "D" felony)

Not sure how it works in a civil case but Connecticut law tends to be on the "harsh" side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iRONic

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,029
48,001
136
Yes, you can get someone cited for contempt of court after failing to appear for a deposition, after you first file a motion in court to compel attendance and the court orders an appearance on a date certain, then the deponent again fails to appear. In CA the penalty is usually 5 days jail time. But it can increase if the conduct continues afterwards.

I have no idea what Jones is thinking here, except that since he didn't produce documents in the other suit which caused him to lose the case by default, and he doesn't want to be deposed in this one, he is clearly hiding things. Why doesn't he just settle the case? Maybe he doesn't have the money to do so.

These plaintiffs will be chasing him around to enforce these judgments against him for years to come. They'll be attaching his bank accounts, liening his properties, and garnishing his wages for a long time. He's probably best off just going BK right now, him and Infowars as both have been sued.

My guess as to what he's hiding is documents which indicate that he never believed Sandy Hook was fake. The one thing he cannot tolerate is his fans finding out that he's been conning them for these past 20 years.
I read somewhere that he’s using these cases to solicit money from his idiot followers so he might be trying to grift his way to a profit here or something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captante

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,426
6,088
126
Yes, you can get someone cited for contempt of court after failing to appear for a deposition, after you first file a motion in court to compel attendance and the court orders an appearance on a date certain, then the deponent again fails to appear. In CA the penalty is usually 5 days jail time. But it can increase if the conduct continues afterwards.

I have no idea what Jones is thinking here, except that since he didn't produce documents in the other suit which caused him to lose the case by default, and he doesn't want to be deposed in this one, he is clearly hiding things. Why doesn't he just settle the case? Maybe he doesn't have the money to do so.

These plaintiffs will be chasing him around to enforce these judgments against him for years to come. They'll be attaching his bank accounts, liening his properties, and garnishing his wages for a long time. He's probably best off just going BK right now, him and Infowars as both have been sued.

My guess as to what he's hiding is documents which indicate that he never believed Sandy Hook was fake. The one thing he cannot tolerate is his fans finding out that he's been conning them for these past 20 years.
I think of that as the cunning of a sociopath or beyond.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
55,855
13,974
146
I wonder how much money he's hidden?



Alex Jones’ Infowars files for bankruptcy following Sandy Hook lawsuits
Jones was found liable for damages in a trio of lawsuits last year filed after he falsely claimed that the 2012 Sandy Hook school massacre was a hoax.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,676
2,429
126
I assume they also have a personal judgment against him. If so he is going to have a tough time discharging this judgment in personal bankruptcy (if he does so file). Also this bankruptcy filing should not stay any continuing action against him personally.

The lawyers he has hired here are certainly not cheap. He's got money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dank69

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
35,325
28,578
136
moar:

moar:
s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21581352/heslin-v-alex-jones-travis-county-texas-petition-assets.pdf
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
58,144
12,317
136
I assume they also have a personal judgment against him. If so he is going to have a tough time discharging this judgment in personal bankruptcy (if he does so file). Also this bankruptcy filing should not stay any continuing action against him personally.

The lawyers he has hired here are certainly not cheap. He's got money.
All the money from those supplements he was hawking had to go somewhere, right?
 

JimKiler

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2002
3,558
205
106
I wonder if they plaintiffs will actually see money from Alex and his scheming relatives. I have a feeling he will go down fighting since this is his whole persona that he is in the wrong.

I cannot believe that Alex finally sat for deposition and then claim they need to be private so the plaintiffs cannot about them and then Alex goes on his show and talks about what he claimed happened in his deposition.
 

JimKiler

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2002
3,558
205
106
If anyone is interested Knowledge Fight podcast has been following a lot of this saga and even had the plaintiff's lawyer on. At one point the lawyer talked about getting discovery from Alex Jones and his companies containing child porn. I am still waiting for charges on that to be filed.
 

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
6,461
7,636
136
Alex Jones says men in the '60s had penises three times the size of men today.


Lol ... Three times? Now according to Google, in 2020 the average penis size was 5.1-5.5 inches, so we can conclude that your typical Boomer was packing a johnson about 15-16 inches long. So .. I know there are some boomers on this board, so would any of you Titans Among Men (or the women who I assume were absolutely terrified of them on their wedding night) care to confirm this?

I'm going with the many woman have, upon seeing Alex, immediately said “What a massive dick.” The bigger the dick, the smaller the penis.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: darkswordsman17

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,188
14,092
136
Last week several of the plaintiff families filed motions to dismiss the bankruptcy cases. They are alleging that Jones is hiding money in offshore accounts and with family members, and that the bankruptcy is a sham. Now, this week, the bankruptcy trustee himself filed a similar motion. The bankruptcy trustee is usually an attorney appointed by the court to manage the bankruptcy estate.


Here is the motion to dismiss, which is worth a read if you want to find out what Jones is up to here. First paragraph:

Debtors’ cases should be dismissed for cause under section 1112(b)(1) because these are classic bad faith filings for two primary reasons: these cases serve no valid bankruptcy purpose and were filed to gain a tactical advantage in the Sandy Hook Lawsuits. The strategy employed here—filing bankruptcy for three non-operating members of a larger enterprise to channel and cap liability against the other, revenue-generating members of that enterprise and its owner using a bankruptcy subchapter designed to aid small, struggling businesses—is a novel and dangerous tactic that is abusive and undermines the integrity of the bankruptcy system. Bankruptcy, however, is intended to protect honest but unfortunate debtors who subject themselves and their assets to the supervision of the Court.


He spends 25 years making conspiracy claims about the federal government, then asks them to help him carry out an illegal scheme to screw over the Sandy Hook plaintiffs. This asshole should be thrown right the hell out of bankruptcy court. He can file for real bankruptcy later on when he and his companies are actually broke.
 
Last edited: