Alcohol detectors in cars to be standard in CA?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

thraashman

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
11,112
1,587
126
I've used this exact argument in debates against gun registration and licensing. And now California is trying to make it a reality. Go figure.

I'm not actually sure which side you're taking on the gun registration debate here. But in that situation I'm all for treating gun registration and licensing exactly like car. License the gun owner and they have to get renewed every so often similar to cars. Make individual funs be registered just like a car. A car used properly will never kill anyone. A gun used properly will always kill something.

But, that's off topic so let's move on.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
I think all men should be required to wear a boner sensor, and if it goes off when a child is present, it cuts off the man's penis. Gotta protect the children.
 

irishScott

Lifer
Oct 10, 2006
21,562
3
0
I'm not actually sure which side you're taking on the gun registration debate here. But in that situation I'm all for treating gun registration and licensing exactly like car. License the gun owner and they have to get renewed every so often similar to cars. Make individual funs be registered just like a car. A car used properly will never kill anyone. A gun used properly will always kill something.

But, that's off topic so let's move on.

In a nutshell, I'm for gun licensing/registration in theory but against it due to the slippery slope argument. But the bolded took the words out of my mouth. Moving on...
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
A car used properly will never kill anyone. A gun used properly will always kill something.

You can properly drive a car, blow a tire and skid over a crowd of pedestrians.

You can properly use a gun and either miss or wound someone.

Lesson: avoid absolutes.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,960
6,798
126
You're not inconvenienced by a key. Nor does a key rely on the concept of guilty until proven innocent.

You don't tell the great Moonbeam when he's inconvenienced and a locked car is a testament to guilt. That is why you check to make sure your door is locked when you stop at a sign and a black man is standing there. You know damn well he's guilty.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
You don't tell the great Moonbeam when he's inconvenienced and a locked car is a testament to guilt. That is why you check to make sure your door is locked when you stop at a sign and a black man is standing there. You know damn well he's guilty.

Now I'm not sure what side of this you're on. Are you trying to make his point? ;)

Like a libertarian, you seem to understand that racism is a type of collectivism. :)
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,960
6,798
126
You can properly drive a car, blow a tire and skid over a crowd of pedestrians.

You can properly use a gun and either miss or wound someone.

Lesson: avoid absolutes.

Be careful blowing the tire. You could get your head run over. Anybody blowing their tire should have his or her head examined. Tires will blow but folk don't blow tires. Get real. I have pissed on a few though. When I was young.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,960
6,798
126
Now I'm not sure what side of this you're on. Are you trying to make his point? ;)

Like a libertarian, you seem to understand that racism is a type of collectivism. :)

I am, as always, on the side of reason. I will know what that is just as soon as I form an opinion.
 

1prophet

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
5,313
534
126
We can rename it the Lindsay Lohan driver safety act and pay her to promote the concept of how the state can protect all of us from ourselves since we sure aren't doing it.

Lindsay-Lohan-shot.jpg
 

JeepinEd

Senior member
Dec 12, 2005
869
63
91
I think it's a great idea. The government should also install video cameras in everyone's home, to make sure no kids or women are abused. It's all in the name of safety. Think of the children! While we're at it, we should also add a monitor so that our esteemed government officials can wake us up and make sure we complete at least 15 minutes of exercise every morning. Think of how many lives can be saved just by having a healthier population. It's all for the greater good.
 

wuliheron

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2011
3,536
0
0
You're not inconvenienced by a key. Nor does a key rely on the concept of guilty until proven innocent.


You could argue that making driver's license's mandatory assumes that people are stupid and lazy. Why not just wait until someone breaks the law or causes an accident to see if they know how to drive? Because the ugly truth is people often are stupid and lazy!

While you can't protect people from themselves all the time and it's debatable whether you should even try you would have to be even more stupid and lazy to allow stupid and lazy people to have every opportunity in the world to kill you.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,251
55,803
136
I think it's a great idea. The government should also install video cameras in everyone's home, to make sure no kids or women are abused. It's all in the name of safety. Think of the children! While we're at it, we should also add a monitor so that our esteemed government officials can wake us up and make sure we complete at least 15 minutes of exercise every morning. Think of how many lives can be saved just by having a healthier population. It's all for the greater good.

Clearly attempting to prevent a crime that kills more than 10,000 people each year is basically the same thing as the government mandating exercise.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
Clearly attempting to prevent a crime that kills more than 10,000 people each year is basically the same thing as the government mandating exercise.

Do you have any idea how many people die from heart disease and diabetes? People should be forced to maintain a healthier lifestyle. God damn your freedoms, people's lives are at stake.
 

JeepinEd

Senior member
Dec 12, 2005
869
63
91
Clearly attempting to prevent a crime that kills more than 10,000 people each year is basically the same thing as the government mandating exercise.

There are an estimated 4.8 million victims of domestic violence every year. Over 1000 women are murdered in domestic violence cases. Clearly, we need government officials monitoring every home to make sure such abuses don't take place. The best way to do it is through the use of video cameras in every home.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,251
55,803
136
Do you have any idea how many people die from heart disease and diabetes? People should be forced to maintain a healthier lifestyle. God damn your freedoms, people's lives are at stake.

God I hope you aren't serious.

When you eat a cheeseburger, your neighbor doesn't have a heart attack, you do. When you get in a drunken collision, frequently other people are maimed or killed.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,251
55,803
136
There are an estimated 4.8 million victims of domestic violence every year. Over 1000 women are murdered in domestic violence cases. Clearly, we need government officials monitoring every home to make sure such abuses don't take place. The best way to do it is through the use of video cameras in every home.

The freedom to be exempt from government intrusion in your home is a constitutionally guaranteed right, the freedom to drive your car however you feel like isn't. How do you not know this?

Internet libertarians are the saddest libertarians.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
There are an estimated 4.8 million victims of domestic violence every year. Over 1000 women are murdered in domestic violence cases. Clearly, we need government officials monitoring every home to make sure such abuses don't take place. The best way to do it is through the use of video cameras in every home.

Eskimospy doesn't care about women being abused. Typical man.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
God I hope you aren't serious.

When you eat a cheeseburger, your neighbor doesn't have a heart attack, you do. When you get in a drunken collision, frequently other people are maimed or killed.

I only have a heart attack when I get his bill from the hospital. If you want me to pay for the results of his eating habits, then I want to regulate his eating habits.
 

JeepinEd

Senior member
Dec 12, 2005
869
63
91
The freedom to be exempt from government intrusion in your home is a constitutionally guaranteed right, the freedom to drive your car however you feel like isn't. How do you not know this?

Internet libertarians are the saddest libertarians.

What about my constitutionally guaranteed right to a trial. A government mandated alcohol detector assumes that I am guilty of driving under the influence and forces me to prove that I'm not, before it will let me drive.

I wonder what kind of germs will build up in those things. Especially with multiple drivers, valet parking, car wash, mechanics, etc. all having to breathe in to that tube...

Edit: BTW, I am NOT a Libertarian. Nor am I a Democrat or Republican. I think for myself.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,251
55,803
136
I only have a heart attack when I get his bill from the hospital. If you want me to pay for the results of his eating habits, then I want to regulate his eating habits.

Amazingly enough, we regulate direct causes in different ways than we regulate proximate causes. Any more ridiculous arguments?

Half of this board is an internet libertarian, free to espouse silly ideas, never realizing how thankful they should be that society protects them from the consequences of these ideas by never implementing them.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,251
55,803
136
What about my constitutionally guaranteed right to a trial. A government mandated alcohol detector assumes that I am guilty of driving under the influence and forces me to prove that I'm not, before it will let me drive.

I wonder what kind of germs will build up in those things. Especially with multiple drivers, valet parking, car wash, mechanics, etc. all having to breathe in to that tube...

Edit: BTW, I am NOT a Libertarian. Nor am I a Democrat or Republican. I think for myself.

Your right to a trial has nothing to do with automobile regulation. Similarly, the government can require you to wear a seat belt in a car without putting you on trial.
 

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
What I'm alluding it is the previously quoted poster saying he's glad he doesn't live in California. If California mandates it, you can bet in a few years time it will become "standard" on all cars sold in the US, whether the state you live in requires it or not.

edit: brain fart, you WERE the previously quoted poster. sorry

Not true. If you look up numerous models in parts catalogs there are CA versions, and federal versions, mostly emissions related.
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
How about the fact you need a fucking key to start the car. Why the fuck do I have to have a key. Why the f do I have to be inconvenienced just because there are thieves? But good to know there are other folk who think like me.
I don't need a key to start my car.