How is this relevant? I noticed white supremacists like to drink water.
Its relevant because so much of Nazi and Communist propaganda characterize normal people who they don't like in exactly such a manner.
The woman is absolutely under attack. Why do you think insurance companies view women as higher risk profiles?
Because pregancies usually involve hospital stays that are expensive, not because anything is attacking her.
Pregnancies are a huge risk factor, probably more so than most anything else when it comes to health.
No argument with that. But the pregnancy is not attacking her, any more than your brain attacks you when it raises your body temperature to fight an infection, leading to a possibly dangerous fever. Normal bodily functions can't be characterized as an attack.
There is nothing dishonest about what I said. The fetus literally occupies space in the woman's uterus and literally leeches nutrients from her body. If anything, calling it a person is dishonest until you successfully change the laws defining what a person is. Calling it a child is playing fast and loose with the terminology as well.
If, as has been done before, I characterized disabled people as leeches or parasites on the resources and time of society, all with the ultimate aim of trying to get them killed, would you say that's an honest argument?
Regardless, how do any of the reasons you offered override a woman's right to defend her body with lethal force?
They don't, because as I said in my first response, I don't disagree that women have that right, if they are under attack. Mischaracterizing a pregnancy as an attack doesn't lend any credibility to your argument.