Alabama gives gun back to domestic violence perp, uses gun to kill wife

[MrSquished]

of course the guy was a former cop

'He shot me': Why did Alabama give Jason McIntosh back his gun?

Alabama authorities took his gun away after a violent domestic incident. Nine months later they gave it back, and he used it to shoot and kill his wife.

www.nbcnews.com

GO GUNNNSS!!

in 2019 nearly 1000 women were killed by their partners with a gun.

'MURICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This blood is on the hands of EVERY SINGLE GQP GUN NUT PIECE OF SHIT VOTER AND POLITICIAN IN THIS COUNTRY!

 

[HomerJS]

Taking guns away from dangerous people PROVEN not to be able to handle them violates their precious rights

Isn't it odd their 2A rights was a greater right then his wife's life.

 

[tweaker2]

Taking guns away from dangerous people PROVEN not to be able to handle them violates their precious rights

Isn't it odd their 2A rights was a greater right then his wife's life.

For some gun rights advocates, it doesn't matter how many lives are lost from the deadly use of firearms, except of course if their own kinfolk got whacked and that's due to their belief that only antifa and BLM socialist commies could have done such a heinous thing.

What with lies like that being so much more convenient to believe than the ugly truth they can't possibly live with, they got it covered. Whether up, down inside and out all of those nasty factoids that point to what is just so wrong with their party so easily explained by simply cooking up some lie that skates around the truth like Trump used to skate around the laws of the land.

 

[MomentsofSanity]

My god they took it away initially because... he fucking shot her! And charges were still pending.

 

[ch33zw1z]

thank god he was a responsible gun owner.

 

[Leeea]

At some point, a person realizes there are only two types of republicans:

gullible fools
evil, sadistic, and vicious monsters

 

[uclaLabrat]

At some point, a person realizes there are only two types of republicans:

gullible fools
evil, sadistic, and vicious monsters

Smart. Honest. Republican.

Pick two.

 

[Lost_in_the_HTTP]

Sounds like a civil suit in the making.

 

[soulcougher73]

On the tape, reviewed by NBC News, McIntosh talked about his fascination with serial killers and how planning mass shootings was a "soothing thought" that helped him sleep at night. He also told his wife he’d felt the urge to beat her to death with a tennis racket, and if he did do it he’d stand over her body and say, "Laugh now, bitch."

Sounds like fine officer material…..

 

[Vic]

From the article, it seems fairly apparent that the ALEA violated state law by returning the gun directly to McIntosh, and is liable. While the ALEA wants to argue that they could not hold onto the personal property, their proper course of action, given that they had knowledge of the restraining order, should have been to contact the judge who issued the restraining order first.

 

[woolfe9998]

Yes, there will likely be a civil suit. ALEA gave him the gun back because its investigation relating to the prior gun incident was over and because the restraining order said nothing about guns. But a state statute says no one under a restraining order can possess a firearm.

 

[woolfe9998]

My god they took it away initially because... he fucking shot her! And charges were still pending.

Charges were not pending on the prior incident involving the gun.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

of course the guy was a former cop

'He shot me': Why did Alabama give Jason McIntosh back his gun?

Alabama authorities took his gun away after a violent domestic incident. Nine months later they gave it back, and he used it to shoot and kill his wife.

www.nbcnews.com

GO GUNNNSS!!

in 2019 nearly 1000 women were killed by their partners with a gun.

'MURICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This blood is on the hands of EVERY SINGLE GQP GUN NUT PIECE OF SHIT VOTER AND POLITICIAN IN THIS COUNTRY!

Why? Do you think the ex-cop and big ole guy needed a gun to kill her?

Because you don't have a fk'in clue, no, no he didn't need one. The problem is letting violent offenders out on parole, the guy should still be rotting in jail.

of course the guy was a former cop

'He shot me': Why did Alabama give Jason McIntosh back his gun?

Alabama authorities took his gun away after a violent domestic incident. Nine months later they gave it back, and he used it to shoot and kill his wife.

www.nbcnews.com

GO GUNNNSS!!

in 2019 nearly 1000 women were killed by their partners with a gun.

'MURICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This blood is on the hands of EVERY SINGLE GQP GUN NUT PIECE OF SHIT VOTER AND POLITICIAN IN THIS COUNTRY!

You're making it a gun issue instead of what it is........ a crime issue. He could have killed her any number of ways that didn't require that particular weapon. The issue was that he was permitted to be out on bail and have access to her when he was a proven danger.

Just like leftist judges routinely allow Antifa and BLM violent terrorist offenders back on the streets to commit additional crimes. Being soft on crime gets people killed.

 

[MrSquished]

Why? Do you think the ex-cop and big ole guy needed a gun to kill her?

Because you don't have a fk'in clue, no, no he didn't need one. The problem is letting violent offenders out on parole, the guy should still be rotting in jail.

You're making it a gun issue instead of what it is........ a crime issue. He could have killed her any number of ways that didn't require that particular weapon. The issue was that he was permitted to be out on bail and have access to her when he was a proven danger.

Just like leftist judges routinely allow Antifa and BLM violent terrorist offenders back on the streets to commit additional crimes. Being soft on crime gets people killed.

You are intellectually an idiot. A gun completely changes the dynamic in many crimes vs the very messy and other ways to kill summertime. You'd have to be an idiot or a sociopath to not understand that. Oh wait, you are a die hard Trumpster. That makes you a sociopath. Also this is in Alabama, not exactly a land of leftist judges. Also he was a cop. We know how lenient the law is on them. Your are so gone.

But from domestic violence to Antifa and BLM? Holy fucked up disturbed train of thought. What did you blame America being Numero uno in the world of gun violence among first world countries before your imaginary bogeymen of Antifa and BLM arrived last year too blame it on you sicko?

Do the world a favor. Jump off a bridge.

 

[MrSquished]

Also, the murder rate per capita in other first world countries vs America is large. One of the main factors, though not the only one, is how guns turn the act of killing into almost like a video game. Just squeeze a trigger, no getting messy with assaults and long beatings and getting blood on you and getting too close and personal. Most people aren't that hardcore. A gun is a totally different ballgame. It changes everything about a tense situation.

Anyways, all this is too complex thought for Mr tajmahal. Go on with your plan to throw nades.

 

[VW MAN]

Just like leftist judges routinely allow Antifa and BLM violent terrorist offenders back on the streets to commit additional crimes. Being soft on crime gets people killed.

Ok fuckhead back this shit up with factual based evidence.

 

[balloonshark]

For some reason in this country some folks believe a one of their constitutional rights is more important than your right to live. We see the horror play out on a daily basis.

 

[Vic]

Why? Do you think the ex-cop and big ole guy needed a gun to kill her?

Because you don't have a fk'in clue, no, no he didn't need one. The problem is letting violent offenders out on parole, the guy should still be rotting in jail.

You're making it a gun issue instead of what it is........ a crime issue. He could have killed her any number of ways that didn't require that particular weapon. The issue was that he was permitted to be out on bail and have access to her when he was a proven danger.

Just like leftist judges routinely allow Antifa and BLM violent terrorist offenders back on the streets to commit additional crimes. Being soft on crime gets people killed.

There was no judge that was soft on crime here. It was law enforcement that was soft on crime here when they returned a gun to a person who was not legally allowed to possess one because he was a wife-beater.

 

[Vic]

Ok fuckhead back this shit up with factual based evidence.

He can't. The reason he calls Antifa and BLM "violent terrorist offenders" even when they're peacefully protesting is because he wants people locked up for speech he disagrees with. But if right-wing extremists beat and kill people in the streets, or try to violently overthrow the Constitution like what happened on 1/6, then they're "patriots" being persecuted for their beliefs.

 

[Sunburn74]

All I'll say is that if you decide to date and marry a gun owner, you're acknowledging the high likelihood that they'll shoot you. People don't buy guns in order to NOT use them.

Also can we strengthen domestic violence laws in this country? Why not just have a zero tolerance law where the first offense is a perma loss of gun rights and 2 years in jail minimum?

 

[ch33zw1z]

All I'll say is that if you decide to date and marry a gun owner, you're acknowledging the high likelihood that they'll shoot you. People don't buy guns in order to NOT use them.

Also can we strengthen domestic violence laws in this country? Why not just have a zero tolerance law where the first offense is a perma loss of gun rights and 2 years in jail minimum?

*Gasp* personal responsibility?!

https://imgur.com/9L1rA2i

 

[NWRMidnight]

Why? Do you think the ex-cop and big ole guy needed a gun to kill her?

Because you don't have a fk'in clue, no, no he didn't need one. The problem is letting violent offenders out on parole, the guy should still be rotting in jail.

You're making it a gun issue instead of what it is........ a crime issue. He could have killed her any number of ways that didn't require that particular weapon. The issue was that he was permitted to be out on bail and have access to her when he was a proven danger.

Just like leftist judges routinely allow Antifa and BLM violent terrorist offenders back on the streets to commit additional crimes. Being soft on crime gets people killed.

If it isn't a gun issue, and he could have killed her in a number of other ways, why did it not happen until he got the gun back since he had months to try and kill her without the gun?

As for Antifa and BLM comment, go educate yourself. Majority of the crimes that you righties blame on them are not done by them at all. But they are you go to people to blame rather than looking and blaming within.

 

[MrSquished]

If it isn't a gun issue, and he could have killed her in a number of other ways, why did it not happen until he got the gun back since he had months to try and kill her without the gun.

As for Antifa and BLM comment, go educate yourself. Majority of the crimes that you righties blame on them are not done by them at all. But they are you go to people to blame rather than looking and blaming within.

These people are pure evil. They don't exist in reality and their thought process is utterly disturbed. If given the go ahead by an authoritarian fascist state we can see they dearly want, they would commit crimes against humanity in an instant.

 

[NWRMidnight]

Ok fuckhead back this shit up with factual based evidence.

He can't. The blind fold he wears, with slits cut into it, and the hearing aids he uses only allow him to see and hear, one narrow false view spewed by Fox News and the like. Currently, the only view many Republican's can see or hear, is Trumps dirty ass spewing lie after lie which Fox News and the like just amplify. Understand, I use the term dirty in a very broad sense of the word that covers a laundry list of things that has nothing to do with dirt.

 

[Sunburn74]

If it isn't a gun issue, and he could have killed her in a number of other ways, why did it not happen until he got the gun back since he had months to try and kill her without the gun.

I mean why even have gun laws at all when people can kill each other in other ways? And why even have driving laws at all when people can kill each other in other ways? Why have seatbelt laws when you can still die in a crash? Or why have food safety laws for restaurants when they can still make you sick if they want? At the end of the day why have laws at all? That's what the pro gun team ultimately seems to want. A land where the only law is that which is laid down by your own gun.