Athanasius
Senior member
- Nov 16, 1999
- 975
- 0
- 0
The electoral college should stay. In my reading of the Constitution, I see a consistent pattern of states first, then overall nation. For instance, the Constitution itself says that all powers not specifically granted to the federal government by the Constitution should revert to the states. Without an electoral college insuring that smaller states would get a voice, there would have been no union in the first place.
By a "states first" count, Bush won significantly more states than Gore. By "an overall national count", Gore won by roughly .002. Under current "official" votes, Bush is winning Florida by roughly .000155. Both margins are miniscule. Florida's margin is absurdly close.
A "pure" democracy would only insure the tyranny of the majority, even if that majority was .000155.
Moonbeam, I'm surprised at your blatant attempts to seize the "higher evolutionary ground." You are usually the voice of tolerance. I assume that your post simply represents your usual ironic wit and sarcasm
By a "states first" count, Bush won significantly more states than Gore. By "an overall national count", Gore won by roughly .002. Under current "official" votes, Bush is winning Florida by roughly .000155. Both margins are miniscule. Florida's margin is absurdly close.
A "pure" democracy would only insure the tyranny of the majority, even if that majority was .000155.
Moonbeam, I'm surprised at your blatant attempts to seize the "higher evolutionary ground." You are usually the voice of tolerance. I assume that your post simply represents your usual ironic wit and sarcasm
