• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

AK47 vs M16

Know the strengths and weaknesses of your rifle.

A soldier carrying an AK47 knows they won't be accurate at 200+ yards. But at half that distance or less, the AK47 is accurate enough, and much more powerful.

The durability of the AK47 is undisputed. Check out this guy burning through 300 rounds while his AK47 is literally on fire. The AK47 is also simple to clean, simple to service and machine.
 
The youtube comments cause my brain to get stupider

Good job waisting of bullets!! like there isnt enough iraqi guys to use those bullets on

I wish I could rate this with a negative star. This is why our gun rights are in jeopardy, dumb redneck hicks like you! What is responsible about this? He's wasting rounds shooting off into who knows where while destroying a class 3 rifle, which would cost quite a bit if obtained legally. So please, tell me what's cool about this "vid" and why you decided to make it.
 
The thing is the VAST majority of shooters aren't accurate enough that the M16s better accuracy means anything to them. If you have an army of draftees or even trained grunts they will do just fine with an AK47. And for the highly trained soldiers then you can give them more advanced weapons.
 
Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
Doesn't it also have no automatic-fire mode, only burst-fire? Which I think is bullshit, since removing options is never a good thing.

Well the problem is most troops aren't that highely educated so they just "spray and pray" and shoot off all their ammo way to quick. So they took full auto off the M16 so people actually take the time to aim instead of just shooting wildly. OF course the better soldiers can use full auto on the more "advanced" guns like the M4.
 
Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
Originally posted by: TallBill
M16 is a lot different then an M4.

Care to enlighten a real-life noob? 😉

M4 is shorter.

Doesn't it also have no automatic-fire mode, only burst-fire? Which I think is bullshit, since removing options is never a good thing.

I believe
M16A1 - full auto
M16A2 - burst
M16A3 - full auto
M16A4 - burst

M4 - burst
M4A1 - full auto
 
Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
Originally posted by: TallBill
M16 is a lot different then an M4.

Care to enlighten a real-life noob? 😉

M4 is shorter.

Doesn't it also have no automatic-fire mode, only burst-fire? Which I think is bullshit, since removing options is never a good thing.

I want my cyanide tipped, armor piercing thermonuclear bullets.
 
Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
Originally posted by: TallBill
M16 is a lot different then an M4.

Care to enlighten a real-life noob? 😉

M4 is shorter.

Doesn't it also have no automatic-fire mode, only burst-fire? Which I think is bullshit, since removing options is never a good thing.

When the hell is Full auto ever better than burst fire?

 
good comparison video and very accurate of real-world conditions
AK-47's you shoot for power, not accuracy. that wood test... :shocked: I didn't know the 7.62 rounds had that kind of penetrating power though. I mean, i knew it had power but not that much... hmm

and modern m-16's lack the full-auto switch. They were firing the M16A3, the M16A4 is the only one used now (excluding training purposes, which basically just use all the old stockpiled rifles), and it's it's safe/semi/3round burst
 
Originally posted by: tenshodo13
Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
Originally posted by: TallBill
M16 is a lot different then an M4.

Care to enlighten a real-life noob? 😉

M4 is shorter.

Doesn't it also have no automatic-fire mode, only burst-fire? Which I think is bullshit, since removing options is never a good thing.

When the hell is Full auto ever better than burst fire?

Well in CSS one time I sprayed really hard on top of the boxes and got a kill!
 
Aren't M16s also limited by what kind of bullet they can use? Militarily at least. If I understand correctly, even though the M16 uses smaller ammunition than the AK47, we aren't allowed to use a more destructive round like a hollow point.
 
Originally posted by: BrownTown
Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
Doesn't it also have no automatic-fire mode, only burst-fire? Which I think is bullshit, since removing options is never a good thing.

Well the problem is most troops aren't that highely educated so they just "spray and pray" and shoot off all their ammo way to quick. So they took full auto off the M16 so people actually take the time to aim instead of just shooting wildly. OF course the better soldiers can use full auto on the more "advanced" guns like the M4.

M16's never used to have auto either, only the M16A3 did. And currently still not have it. Auto isn't a good thing in a true rifle. That's why your squads have AR gunners (M249 SAW) 😀

on second though...M16A1 may have had auto, i'm not so well versed on the A1 though. A2 were used for a longer period than the A1, and A3's were but a short blip in history for the M16 line.

Originally posted by: Queasy
Aren't M16s also limited by what kind of bullet they can use? Militarily at least. If I understand correctly, even though the M16 uses smaller ammunition than the AK47, we aren't allowed to use a more destructive round like a hollow point.

welcome to NATO rules
no rifle the US will ever field will have anything but the NATO-size round (5.56mm)
 
whatever - the m4 and m16 seem to have so many different attachments / modifications that can be added that with a collective force of them,
they would do better than the ak47/74
 
Originally posted by: tenshodo13
Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
Originally posted by: TallBill
M16 is a lot different then an M4.

Care to enlighten a real-life noob? 😉

M4 is shorter.

Doesn't it also have no automatic-fire mode, only burst-fire? Which I think is bullshit, since removing options is never a good thing.

When the hell is Full auto ever better than burst fire?

he was probably thinking that you should just keep all 3 options open
 
When the Shit hits the fan it will be a lot easier to scrounge/take 5.56 ammo than it will for 7.62x39. Same goes for .308.

The M1a/M14 is trillion times better than both the AR and the AK combined though.
 
Back
Top