Originally posted by: Mloot
Pretty much through the entire month of January, Microcenter was selling the X850xt's for $250, which came with a $50MIR. From what I gather, they moved alot of those cards, so I wouldn't look for them to come down again anytime soon.
Can't say about the 7800GS. If it remains top dog of the AGP litter, it may not come down much at all.
Originally posted by: apoppin
6800gs would be a nice upgrade over a 6600gt . . . $169 after $20 mir
Remains? Do you have a link to benchmarks of the 7800GS beating teh X850XT?Originally posted by: Mloot
Can't say about the 7800GS. If it remains top dog of the AGP litter, it may not come down much at all.
look in Hot Deals forum . . . it was still available yesterday.Originally posted by: Farfle
Originally posted by: apoppin
6800gs would be a nice upgrade over a 6600gt . . . $169 after $20 mir
Where can you get a 6800GS AGP for $169?
I think he confused it with the PCIe version? The BFG OC for under 2 bills shipped 2 day from ZZF is a good price to performer for AGP right now. Particularly if yours does 16/6 and hits ultra speeds or better.Originally posted by: Farfle
Originally posted by: apoppin
6800gs would be a nice upgrade over a 6600gt . . . $169 after $20 mir
Where can you get a 6800GS AGP for $169?
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
I think he confused it with the PCIe version? The BFG OC for under 2 bills shipped 2 day from ZZF is a good price to performer for AGP right now. Particularly if yours does 16/6 and hits ultra speeds or better.Originally posted by: Farfle
Originally posted by: apoppin
6800gs would be a nice upgrade over a 6600gt . . . $169 after $20 mir
Where can you get a 6800GS AGP for $169?
Originally posted by: evolucion8
Actually, in most benchmarks, the X850 XT PE performs the same or faster than the 7800GS, in very few benchmarks, the 7800GS outperformed the X850XT PE by a little margin, the X850XT PE stills the most powerful AGP videocard on the market period. Though the feature set of the 7800GS is more robust, probably it doesn't have the horsepower to run them all without sacrificing resolutions and anti aliasing.
Originally posted by: Malladine
Remains? Do you have a link to benchmarks of the 7800GS beating teh X850XT?Originally posted by: Mloot
Can't say about the 7800GS. If it remains top dog of the AGP litter, it may not come down much at all.
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Malladine
Remains? Do you have a link to benchmarks of the 7800GS beating teh X850XT?Originally posted by: Mloot
Can't say about the 7800GS. If it remains top dog of the AGP litter, it may not come down much at all.
I agree. The X850XT is faster, however it lacks SM3. The 7800GS is not worth more than $200 IMO. It's not much better than my X800Pro, and I paid less than that for it 6 months ago.
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Malladine
Remains? Do you have a link to benchmarks of the 7800GS beating teh X850XT?Originally posted by: Mloot
Can't say about the 7800GS. If it remains top dog of the AGP litter, it may not come down much at all.
I agree. The X850XT is faster, however it lacks SM3. The 7800GS is not worth more than $200 IMO. It's not much better than my X800Pro, and I paid less than that for it 6 months ago.
More brain deadness. X850XT is not faster.
.the X850 XTPE is generally faster than the new NVIDIA part
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Malladine
Remains? Do you have a link to benchmarks of the 7800GS beating teh X850XT?Originally posted by: Mloot
Can't say about the 7800GS. If it remains top dog of the AGP litter, it may not come down much at all.
I agree. The X850XT is faster, however it lacks SM3. The 7800GS is not worth more than $200 IMO. It's not much better than my X800Pro, and I paid less than that for it 6 months ago.
More brain deadness. X850XT is not faster.
You're talking about your own dead brain, right? The one that AEG pays to post that crap?
According to the AnandTech Review:.the X850 XTPE is generally faster than the new NVIDIA part
Also, a test summary since you seem to think we'll fall for your crap:
bf2 - 43 nVidia/39 ATI, 31 nVidia/28 ATI - TIE
far cry - 57 nVidia/71 ATI, 39 nVidia/48 ATI - ATI WIN
fear - 29 nVidia/39 ATI, 13 nVidia/22 ATI - ATI WIN
q4 - 66 nVidia/63 ATI, 35 nVidia/35 ATI - TIE
SC:CT - 27 nVidia/49 ATI, 24 nVidia/40 ATI - ATI WIN
For future reference, if you're gonna flame someone, make sure you know you're right about something.
Sure there are benchmarks where the X800-series cards outrun it (the most prominent being F.E.A.R.), but the e-GeForce 7800 GS CO Superclock delivers better overall performance. By ?overall? we mean in a wide variety of games and applications, running at or near the top in all of the titles we tested. The X800/X850 cards can?t keep up in titles such as Quake 4, IL-2 Sturmovik, and Serious Sam 2. The e-GeForce 7800 GS CO Superclock also boasts a better feature set than the Radeon cards do, it supports HDR with floating-point blending as well as shader model 3.0. On top of that, you?ve got PureVideo support and transparency AA.
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Malladine
Remains? Do you have a link to benchmarks of the 7800GS beating teh X850XT?Originally posted by: Mloot
Can't say about the 7800GS. If it remains top dog of the AGP litter, it may not come down much at all.
I agree. The X850XT is faster, however it lacks SM3. The 7800GS is not worth more than $200 IMO. It's not much better than my X800Pro, and I paid less than that for it 6 months ago.
More brain deadness. X850XT is not faster.
You're talking about your own dead brain, right? The one that AEG pays to post that crap?
According to the AnandTech Review:.the X850 XTPE is generally faster than the new NVIDIA part
Also, a test summary since you seem to think we'll fall for your crap:
bf2 - 43 nVidia/39 ATI, 31 nVidia/28 ATI - TIE
far cry - 57 nVidia/71 ATI, 39 nVidia/48 ATI - ATI WIN
fear - 29 nVidia/39 ATI, 13 nVidia/22 ATI - ATI WIN
q4 - 66 nVidia/63 ATI, 35 nVidia/35 ATI - TIE
SC:CT - 27 nVidia/49 ATI, 24 nVidia/40 ATI - ATI WIN
For future reference, if you're gonna flame someone, make sure you know you're right about something.
No, I was refering to your brain deadness. According to Firingsquads review:
Sure there are benchmarks where the X800-series cards outrun it (the most prominent being F.E.A.R.), but the e-GeForce 7800 GS CO Superclock delivers better overall performance. By ?overall? we mean in a wide variety of games and applications, running at or near the top in all of the titles we tested. The X800/X850 cards can?t keep up in titles such as Quake 4, IL-2 Sturmovik, and Serious Sam 2. The e-GeForce 7800 GS CO Superclock also boasts a better feature set than the Radeon cards do, it supports HDR with floating-point blending as well as shader model 3.0. On top of that, you?ve got PureVideo support and transparency AA.
Also, a test summary since you seem to think we'll fall for your crap:
HL2: Nv - 57.5 ATI - 59.6 Win for ATI
HL2 LC: - NV - 36.1 ATI - 32.1 Win for NV
Bf2: NV - 48.7 ATI - 41.2 Win for NV
Quake4: NV - 55.2 ATI - 43.2 Win for NV
IL2: NV - 50.2 ATI - 40.1 Win for NV
FEAR: NV - 28 ATI - 35 Win for ATI
CoD2: NV - 23.4 ATI - 25 Win for ATI
SS2: NV - 39 ATI - 29.8 Win for NV
Far Cry HDR: NV - 36.4 ATI - Oppss the ATI can't do HDR. Win for NV
For future reference, well, just make sure you know what you're talking about.