• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Afghanistan on fire, troops hater more than ever before, innocent workers killed.

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Until the world exterminates all of the muslim radicals or the west totally submits to them, there will never be a lasting peace on this earth.

Another option: True muslims rise up against the extremists or whatever it takes to fix this problem from within. Whether or not this is realistic, I don't know. What is going on in some muslim countries gives me some hope however.
 
Another option: True muslims rise up against the extremists or whatever it takes to fix this problem from within. Whether or not this is realistic, I don't know. What is going on in some muslim countries gives me some hope however.

Other than the token "We strongly condemn the actions of these terrorists and will bring those responsible to justice", what else have they really done to combat the radicals?

How long have they been saying this after EVERY attack performed by the extremists? What changes have come about because of them? I cannot think of any.

I wouldn't put my money on this horse...
 
Other than the token "We strongly condemn the actions of these terrorists and will bring those responsible to justice", what else have they really done to combat the radicals?

How long have they been saying this after EVERY attack performed by the extremists? What changes have come about because of them? I cannot think of any.

I wouldn't put my money on this horse...

I wouldn't either, at least not in the current way of muslim hierarchy and the total opposite of separation of church and state. Just another option is all.
 
Some guy burns a book and idiots half a world away kill each other? And this is a problem how? Sounds like natural selection in action.
 
How about we never set foot in there again?

There is no terrorism land. They hit us on 9/11, we entered a bunch of countries and gave them more reason to hate us.

We stumbled into a trap of sorts. We haven't stopped the terrorists, we've pissed them off. And we are constantly stepping on innocents, giving everyone a worse and worse impression and image of us - while our men and women die and suffer.

Just stop it already. It's over. Seal our borders and let the rest of the world burn.

Also, tell big oil to fuck itself and create an alt source of energy already.
 
They are killing people at the UN. That is why it is a problem. Now if you want to say we shouldn't be there at all, then I'd agree but that is a different discussion.

That is the UN's problem. Maybe this could be a wake up call that part of the world is simply fucked beyond all hope. These people live a different life than we do in the west. We need to realize not all cultures are equal and we cant force them to be either.
 
That is the UN's problem. Maybe this could be a wake up call that part of the world is simply fucked beyond all hope. These people live a different life than we do in the west. We need to realize not all cultures are equal and we cant force them to be either.

The US is part of the UN, i don't get how Americans don't understand this, the UN isn't some invention that everyone but the US is a part of, it's creation was under supervision of ALL nations but mostly the US, an attack on the UN is a direct attack on all nations in the UN, including the US.

I also don't get why the fuck we invaded Afghanistan if the purpose wasn't to do anything but get a bunch of people (our own as well as theirs) killed and then leave while letting the Taliban and Al Qaueda grow stronger than they have ever been before.

Honestly, that seems to have been what was mostly wanted if i look back at how the orders have been given, to make sure Al Qaueda wins while making them grow bigger than ever before.

What a fucking waste of time, money and lives.
 
They are killing people at the UN. That is why it is a problem. Now if you want to say we shouldn't be there at all, then I'd agree but that is a different discussion.

Don't bother, these people are so daft that they think that the UN is some foreign liberal organisation which hates the US even though the US is the strongest and most influential member in the UN.

They are not right in the head.
 
Don't bother, these people are so daft that they think that the UN is some foreign liberal organisation which hates the US even though the US is the strongest and most influential member in the UN.

They are not right in the head.

So what is your solution to stop these radical nutjobs from killing each other and the UN because somebody on the other side of the world burns a book?
 
So what is your solution to stop these radical nutjobs from killing each other and the UN because somebody on the other side of the world burns a book?

First of all, don't make the job harder by pretending it's a Christian Crusade, by burning the Koran and by being degenerate idiots. That's a start.

Second, if you do and they attack, the UN guards must be allowed to protect them, as it is they are not allowed to and if that doesn't help either, kill them, ALL of them.

Every single one who is willing to fight is willing to die, so let them die.
 
First of all, don't make the job harder by pretending it's a Christian Crusade, by burning the Koran and by being degenerate idiots. That's a start.

Surpressing freedom of expression back home. That isnt going to happen. Next...

Second, if you do and they attack, the UN guards must be allowed to protect them, as it is they are not allowed to and if that doesn't help either, kill them, ALL of them.

Agreed

Every single one who is willing to fight is willing to die, so let them die.

Agreed
 
Surpressing freedom of expression back home. That isnt going to happen. Next...

Yeah, i get that and that is why i am absolutely not arguing that it should be forbidden, but they should know that there are consequences for their actions, consequences that will get people dead. Personally i wish they would have the guts to go down to Afghanistan and do it but they don't, they are weak arse little cowards who like to taunt fun at the enemy and hide behind others who die in their stead. They are pathetic little fools.

But yeah, we mostly agree anyway so...
 
Surpressing freedom of expression back home. That isnt going to happen. Next...

He didn't say make it so people can't do it, he said people shouldn't do it. If a child touches a hot pan on the stove and burns himself, you don't stop putting pans on the stove in your house, you tell the stupid child not to do that or hope he's smart enough to learn it was a bad idea. It's called common sense. You don't provoke radically crazy people for no reason for the same reason you don't poke a rattlesnake with a stick, it'll bite you. Now maybe that rattlesnake will bite you anyway true, but avoid giving it a reason.
 
I think it's obvious that we need to just withdraw from Afghanistan and let JoS set up in a stable firing position back in the UK. He can take out the Taliban in Afghanistan from there with his 30-06 "sniper rifle." Lulz.
 
I think it's obvious that we need to just withdraw from Afghanistan and let JoS set up in a stable firing position back in the UK. He can take out the Taliban in Afghanistan from there with his 30-06 "sniper rifle." Lulz.

Are you sure it's not a pellet (rubber) gun?

I'm sure he's not the SAS warrior he claims to be. Hell he claims to be a grandfather as well, I can just see him leading his elite SAS team while using a cane.
 
I think it's obvious that we need to just withdraw from Afghanistan and let JoS set up in a stable firing position back in the UK. He can take out the Taliban in Afghanistan from there with his 30-06 "sniper rifle." Lulz.

My stalker is back, don't you get enough attention now that you can announce that you are a whore for cock after the DADT fell?
 
Are you sure it's not a pellet (rubber) gun?

I'm sure he's not the SAS warrior he claims to be. Hell he claims to be a grandfather as well, I can just see him leading his elite SAS team while using a cane.

Absolutely, just like every other leader in American history through the battlefield who have been about my age, right?

They were also old men using canes, hell i'm younger than ANY of them.

Here's a hot tip, get children in your early 20's, they have children in their early 20's and voila, you are a grandfather in your 40's.

Unlike what they show you in the movies experienced men who are the leaders of the first troop to go into a hot zone are not 22 years old.

Perhaps that's obvious to most sane human beings, obviously not to you though...
 
It's obvious to me that you more full of shit than a thanksgiving turkey. Your statements in this thread alone gave you away.

Oh I gotta go...........Get your ass over here. So what it is, you're in the UK or you're in Afghanistan? You must be fucking daft to think anyone is that gullible.
 
It's obvious to me that you more full of shit than a thanksgiving turkey. Your statements in this thread alone gave you away.

Oh I gotta go...........Get your ass over here. So what it is, you're in the UK or you're in Afghanistan? You must be fucking daft to think anyone is that gullible.

Yes, to those who are too daft to know where i am, i'm always somewhere else, aren't i?

And i really don't care what you think about me, all i care about is that you are not retarded enough to go fight Jews over your terrorist beliefs.

I got it the first time, i'm Jewish, you think Hamas is right and i should be dead.
 
My stalker is back, don't you get enough attention now that you can announce that you are a whore for cock after the DADT fell?

Very mature. If you're so angry, why don't you just shoot me where I stand, from the UK. :biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:

I don't know what makes you think you can pass yourself off as military, much less SAS when there are so many actual military members in here. I'm friends with a number of UK officers. I've run your various claims by them (like when you said you could take your SAS issued weapons home with you in the UK) and they've laughed away every one of them.

Does the "cool guy" feeling of lying to everyone here about who you are outweigh the shame you feel when a whole thread full of people call you out for being a liar?
 
Very mature. If you're so angry, why don't you just shoot me where I stand, from the UK. :biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:

I don't know what makes you think you can pass yourself off as military, much less SAS when there are so many actual military members in here. I'm friends with a number of UK officers. I've run your various claims by them (like when you said you could take your SAS issued weapons home with you in the UK) and they've laughed away every one of them.

Does the "cool guy" feeling of lying to everyone here about who you are outweigh the shame you feel when a whole thread full of people call you out for being a liar?

Yea, I would assume it is against the rules for an SAS officer to go babbling on the interwebs about himself. If not then I am sure he be smart enough not to anyway. Most elite units have privacy concerns, for obvious reasons, from what I understand. That was the first (of many) tipoff for me.
 
Back
Top