• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Afghan refugee attacks several on train in Germany with axe

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Silly facebook.
fb-community-standards-all-muzrats.jpg
 
BBC update.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36832909


The so-called Islamic State has released a video purporting to show an Afghan asylum seeker making threats before attacking a German train.
The 17-year-old injured four people with an axe and knife, one critically, in the attack in Wuerzburg on Monday evening. He was shot dead by police.
In the video, a young man brandishing a knife says he is an "IS soldier" preparing for a suicide mission.
German officials say they later found a hand-painted IS flag in his room.

Motive, still unknown. Too hard to untangle.

Let's just chalk it up to workplace violence, and move on.

Nice to know anyone that was on the train will be rounded up and arrested if they dare say anything about being attacked by an axe-wielding psychopath that should never have been let into their country, that might sound *gasp* anti-islamic.

Germany has just about completed leftloon-world.
 
Motive, still unknown. Too hard to untangle.

Let's just chalk it up to workplace violence, and move on.

Nice to know anyone that was on the train will be rounded up and arrested if they dare say anything about being attacked by an axe-wielding psychopath that should never have been let into their country, that might sound *gasp* anti-islamic.

Germany has just about completed leftloon-world.


For the slower forum participants, notice that the family axed were from Hong Kong, presumably asian/chinese.

So according to islamophobes, a jihadi on a mission to destroy the west picks the least western people in aryan-land to fulfill those ambitions. It's really hard to pick out the stupider agenda of the two.
 
Last time I checked, somebody dealt with this shit about 1,300 years ago. Charles Martel would be pretty shocked at how big of a pussy Europe is being. Sure, things still sucked, but you didn't have somebody running down a train with an axe killing people, or bombs/guns, or a semi, or torturing people in a concert venue, or San Bernardino, or Orlando, or Ft. Hood, or strangling their sister to death because she posted pics in dresses...etc.

Yes, and just a couple years ago Europe had a mass murderer kill over 100 people, essentially in protest against Muslim immigration. Maybe the bigots/nativists and the Jihadi assholes should find an island somewhere to go kill each other, and leave the rest of us out of it.
 
Yes, and just a couple years ago Europe had a mass murderer kill over 100 people, essentially in protest against Muslim immigration. Maybe the bigots/nativists and the Jihadi assholes should find an island somewhere to go kill each other, and leave the rest of us out of it.

why is nativism all of a sudden bad? If you have a well run functional country, what is wrong with trying to protect it from people trying to destroy it?
 
why is nativism all of a sudden bad? If you have a well run functional country, what is wrong with trying to protect it from people trying to destroy it?

Because to hold that viewpoint you have to start by assuming that all or most of the refugees or immigrants are actually trying to destroy your country rather than just trying to make a better life for themselves and their children.
 
Because to hold that viewpoint you have to start by assuming that all or most of the refugees or immigrants are actually trying to destroy your country rather than just trying to make a better life for themselves and their children.

And we're somehow obligated to open our borders to immigration?
 
Because to hold that viewpoint you have to start by assuming that all or most of the refugees or immigrants are actually trying to destroy your country rather than just trying to make a better life for themselves and their children.

Problem is that they are trying to make a better life for themselves and their children at the expense of the natives in the country. The native country should see to their own people first before taking in outsiders that could be a threat to their own people. They need to set their priorities straight.
 
And we're somehow obligated to open our borders to immigration?

Are you conjuring up that straw man because you can't refute my actual point? I never said we are obligated to open our borders to immigration, and that has nothing to do with the fact that you need to believe that most/all immigrants are doing things that we need to protect against.
 
Problem is that they are trying to make a better life for themselves and their children at the expense of the natives in the country. The native country should see to their own people first before taking in outsiders that could be a threat to their own people. They need to set their priorities straight.
Maybe it is possible that you are ignoring the positives that come along with immigration and only focusing on any negatives? Maybe if you stopped doing that you'd see that there is no real expense, and perhaps a net benefit?
 
why is nativism all of a sudden bad? If you have a well run functional country, what is wrong with trying to protect it from people trying to destroy it?

You responded to a post in which I mentioned that a European nativist murdered over 100 people by asking me what is wrong with nativism? Really?

Hmm, let's see, what's wrong with people being blindly suspicious of foreigners? Like with Catholic/Irish/German/Italian/Chinese immigrants in the 19th century. When millions of people are suspicious of millions of other people, surely nothing can go wrong!
 
Last edited:
Problem is that they are trying to make a better life for themselves and their children at the expense of the natives in the country. The native country should see to their own people first before taking in outsiders that could be a threat to their own people. They need to set their priorities straight.

Just pointing out that this jihadi attacked asians from HK who're presumably immigrants not natives.

So really your crowd should be cheerleading for this new islamist initiative in support of your cause.
 
Just pointing out that this jihadi attacked asians from HK who're presumably immigrants not natives.

So really your crowd should be cheerleading for this new islamist initiative in support of your cause.

I don't care if they attacked Asians, blacks, whites, whoever. My 'crowd' is where I live, in the US. Each country should be looking to their own problems and their own people first and foremost. The priority should always be to the citizens of the country over all others.
 
I don't care if they attacked Asians, blacks, whites, whoever. My 'crowd' is where I live, in the US. Each country should be looking to their own problems and their own people first and foremost. The priority should always be to the citizens of the country over all others.
What changes should we make to accomplish that goal?
 
I don't care if they attacked Asians, blacks, whites, whoever. My 'crowd' is where I live, in the US. Each country should be looking to their own problems and their own people first and foremost. The priority should always be to the citizens of the country over all others.

That's why you should be pleased with this new kind of jihad since it apparently attacks foreigners instead of natives.
 
For the slower forum participants
Heh, the voice of the "slower forum participants" squeeks- and spews one of the dumbest race-cards ever. It would of course never occur to mr. slow here that this isn't a racial thing, it's ideological. No one gives a shit about the race of the people on the train, not even the attacker. FAIL even at lame leftloon race-baiting 101. Go learn from more skilled leftloons how to properly spew ignorant leftist race-bait drivel, your batshit is weak.



You longing for the days when Germany was a strong take no shit Aryan nation?
...and very next post Earl pretty much Godwin's Laws himself right out of it.

You guys aren't even trying.
 
Heh, the voice of the "slower forum participants" squeeks- and spews one of the dumbest race-cards ever. It would of course never occur to mr. slow here that this isn't a racial thing, it's ideological. No one gives a shit about the race of the people on the train, not even the attacker. FAIL even at lame leftloon race-baiting 101. Go learn from more skilled leftloons how to properly spew ignorant leftist race-bait drivel, your batshit is weak.

Your supposed jihadi choose to attack immigrants in a country full of western infidels.

I think you should keep this up, to conclusively remove any shadow of a doubt just how goddamn stupid your sort are.
 
Your supposed jihadi choose to attack immigrants in a country full of western infidels.

I think you should keep this up, to conclusively remove any shadow of a doubt just how goddamn stupid your sort are.

So why did he hack them? What do you believe was his motive?
 
Back
Top