JohnOfSheffield
Lifer
- Jun 26, 2007
- 11,925
- 2
- 0
Saw this about 15 mins ago, just horrible. Very hard to watch, be warned.
It's kindergarten stuff compared to walking through a Taliban camp and still pepole like Lemon Law supports these actions.
Saw this about 15 mins ago, just horrible. Very hard to watch, be warned.
You can't owe debts to a nation of peasants.
Son, it's not up for discussions whether modern days democracies are modeled after the British Magna Carta, they are, you can deny it all you want but all one has to do is to look at it.
So how are you doing with your mongolian debt in iceland, doing well... hmmm?
Just fuck off.
Your obvious conclusion is wrong.
You can't owe debts to a nation of peasants.
The debt will be collected from the IMF, you'r nation will be our bitch for a long time...
Sucks to be you.
Yet you Mongoloid Vikings seemed to have done just that. Not saying much for you guys.
No one is asking Pakistan to get rid of every Taliban and AQ member, just like when people in the US say We need to end this illegal invasion they're not talking about deporting every illegal: There is no possible way to do so, even if 100% of the population and politicians were for it.
It is possible to lock down our border sufficiently we stop the vast majority of the illegal invasion problem, it is possible to get rid of Millions of illegals (not all, because there are so many, but, Millions), it is possible to keep the illegal invaders out. The problem is, in the US, there are just too many Bleeding Hearts and/or White Guilter's (left) and too many greedy businesspeople (mostly right) who don't want the problem solved. And because this large, yet politically influential, combined % does not want it solved, it doesn't matter what the larger majority want, the Politicians will not do anything meaningful to stop it.
The situation is the same in Pakistan. Because of the brainwashing that goes on there, there are large %'s of the population who have ideals/mindset aligned with the Taliban/AQ, or at least enough so when compared to the US (affects of brainwashing), which allows the Taliban/AQ to operate in those less controlled areas. And you've got politicians there, in their political, military, and intelligence (ISI) that are either sympathetic to the Taliban/AQ, sympathetic to the public who is sympathetic to the Taliban/AQ, or both. Either way, it's the same deal there as here:
Politicians not doing what is best for the country because it's politicially best not to, i.e. they're sellouts, and effectively, traitors.
Chuck
The sheep there anxiously await your arrivalYour nation is already a bitch, the bitch of the US. However, I'm actually moving away from Iceland. I'm now going to Greenland.
Well, in that case, because you said so, I must humbly apologize, coz even though my assumption is right, there is no way that the Indian government can malign the former Mughals.
I don't think it is possible in the normal sense of the word. Of course you could open your search criteria up to include a lot of false positives (kind of like nuking a country to destroy its schools). Other than that, how would it be possible?In that case, the point is moot.
The context of his post referred to Lemon Law's post. Undoubtedly it is possible to rid of every Al-Qaeda member anywhere and everywhere in the world. How feasible it is, thats an open question.
Chuck, most of your points are valid and true.
But I dont see how it contradicts what I was trying to communicate vis a vis my response to chucky2 where he/she is pointedly blaming Pakistan for not doing enough?
Somewhat one total fool of this thread is Chucky2, as he says, "Politicians not doing what is best for the country because it's politicially best not to, i.e. they're sellouts, and effectively, traitors."
Traitors to whom Chucky2? Maybe to the USA and Nato, but you totally forget, Pakistani foreign policy objectives are not the same as US and Nato foreign policy goals.
And worse yet, the USA and Nato due to their own incompetence has made a mess out of their whole region.
That and the fact you have it the other way around, when the USA and Nato are guests in their country, Nato and the USA are total fools if they think they can order the Pakistanis around like servants. Its nothing but your delusional chutzpah.
This post exemplifies the common hatred shared against Muslims and Islam.
At least you have made it abundantly clear that the "secular" image that India tries to project, is utterly false and nonsense.
While you are professing that Parsis and Muslims DO want to stay in India, you clearly suggest that it is Hindus who should benefit from India.
If all that you claim about non-Hindus enjoying the Indian society is so true, why dont you petition the Indian government to allow Kashmir, Assam, Nagaland and the like to hold referendums and let the people decide what they want to do?
Your solution is people give up their land and move somewhere else? Why should anyone give up their belongings?
You also bring up historical context into the picture, calling Muslims tyrannical and violent. Did the Muslim moghul rulers throw out all the Hindus into the sea? If the Muslim rulers were so tyrannical, why didnt the Hindus get up and leave to Nepal? Or elsewhere? I mean this is exactly what you suggest the Muslims in India do now, isnt it?
You are a hypocrite and clearly show the essense of a bigoted, hate-filled person who goes to all extents to villify Muslims.
Oh my God, look over here
http://www.timesofbombay.com/?p=544
Easy googling to show what a shithole India is ^_^
You post about one woman. Let me quote some passages from the article
Hehehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPyANnZ5dDc&feature&skipcontrinter=1
Another Pakistan moment..NSFW
If India does not do it, you can bet your boots that China will buddy up with Pakistan.
School textbooks don't even malign Pakistan FFS.. let alone Mughals. I don't even remember reading a single paragraph being critical of Jinnah. Books we read in school tend to shy away from controversy as much as possible.. exact opposite of what you think.
http://www.cbse.nic.in/secondary_sch_curr_vol1_2011-2009.pdf
Grades 9 and 10.. pages 76 thru 90.
8th grade: http://www.cbseviii.com/ncert/syllabus
Things have been updated to reflect changes, but the gist remains the same.
She already is. India will never, I mean never.. have friendly ties with Pakistan in foreseeable future.
It's not always the text books that teach history. It is the teachers. One of my high school teachers actually thought that the creation was Pakistan was a bad idea. Then she said the army was barbaric during the Dhaka Fall. The educated class in Pakistan is far more open to criticizing their government and rulers as opposed to the self-proclaimed Indian superpowers. I don't think I could get away with criticizing Gandhi in a Mumbai public forum. Heck, an Indian MP who wrote good things about Jinnah was punished. Freedom of speech? Democracy? My foot.
