• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Administration diverts from Hillary's role in Benghazi

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I would have thought obama would have droned the guy while he was at a wedding. I mean now there is no going back on the "it was a youtube video" excuse.
 
I would have thought obama would have droned the guy while he was at a wedding. I mean now there is no going back on the "it was a youtube video" excuse.

That's all you got? I would have thought that the fact they were looking for an actual suspect would have been the first clue that the Obama admin was going away from the youtube talking point.

Alas, I guess you were trying to be funny.
 
LOL! Hard to tell who's dumber in this thread, the dumb as a sack of rocks OP or the idiot libs getting trolled hard by the OP.

Too funny! Keep up the entertainment! 😀
 
That's all you got? I would have thought that the fact they were looking for an actual suspect would have been the first clue that the Obama admin was going away from the youtube talking point.

Alas, I guess you were trying to be funny.

CNN found the suspect a year ago. Reuters found him 2 years ago.
 
LOL! Hard to tell who's dumber in this thread, the dumb as a sack of rocks OP or the idiot libs getting trolled hard by the OP.

Too funny! Keep up the entertainment! 😀

The OP? As in the poster that's mimicking a thread by you and your type? Yeah there is no contest in who is dumber! Thanks for coming to the party!
 
CNN found the suspect two years ago.

Congrats! Thanks for posting your ignorance!

Next time tell us how we should have caught him before evidence and a case could have been made against him. Let us know how you would have handled picking him up in a foreign, sovereign nation.

Or double down and show us just how dumb you are!
 
Last edited:
Oh look, it's another liberal who wants to ban anything that offends him or doesn't agree with his political views.

LOL I am chuckling at myself now for falling hard for this thread.. and not actually reading it and realizing the sarcasm.

Anyway I fully admit I am wearing the "dumb and dumber" T-shirt.. my bad
 
Congrats! Thanks for posting your ignorance!

Next time tell us how we should have caught before evidence and a case could have been made against him. Let us know how you would have handled picking him up in a foreign, sovereign nation.

Or double down and show us just how dumb you are!

Sovereign nation? You must be thinking of a different Libya. This guy should have been bagged a long time ago and sent to gitmo. If you recall the Feds wanted to try Khalid Shaihk Mohammed in New York. Bloomberg rebuffed him because of the circus it would have brung and the millions the city of New York would have to spend on security (An Eric Holder stamp on that one). Gitmo was fine for the turd that helped plan the 9-11-2001 attacks so it shold be fine for the newest turd. But I guess there is more press and we can't have the world seeing another trial at gitmo.
 
Sovereign nation? You must be thinking of a different Libya. This guy should have been bagged a long time ago and sent to gitmo. If you recall the Feds wanted to try Khalid Shaihk Mohammed in New York. Bloomberg rebuffed him because of the circus it would have brung and the millions the city of New York would have to spend on security (An Eric Holder stamp on that one). Gitmo was fine for the turd that helped plan the 9-11-2001 attacks so it shold be fine for the newest turd. But I guess there is more press and we can't have the world seeing another trial at gitmo.

Hows that trial going fuck face? Are you done getting fucked in the ass by right wing propaganda?

Over the top response, even for P&N.

Perknose
Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Benghazi is just a diversion from the real controversy, Obama's Birth Certificate!

Pssh, the birth certificate is just a distraction from the IRS scandal, which is just a distraction from the economy, which is just a distraction from Benghazi, which is just a distraction from the birth certificate.
 
Pssh, the birth certificate is just a distraction from the IRS scandal, which is just a distraction from the economy, which is just a distraction from Benghazi, which is just a distraction from the birth certificate.

Oh shit! You just went full circle!
 
The REAL America has had ENOUGH of Obama! Fox News is the largest cable news organization for a reason: we know the TRUTH; and mark my words, we'll vote Obama OUT in 2016.

Needs more "we the people", random capitalisation and exclamation marks. Possibly bad puns on Obamas name as well.

Other than that a nice spidey post. :thumbup:
 
At this point, what difference does it make?
- Hillary rotten Clinton


Oh, you're so clever. Now it's back to the basement gun bunker for you!

slow-motion-spiderman.gif
 
The Republicans are going to want to heap blame on Hillary. But what exactly was Hillary's role in the Benghazi attack? Does anyone honestly believe that a Secretary of State is going to be involved with day-today-day security details?
 
The Republicans are going to want to heap blame on Hillary. But what exactly was Hillary's role in the Benghazi attack? Does anyone honestly believe that a Secretary of State is going to be involved with day-today-day security details?
As Secretary of State they are ultimately her facilities. She is as involved in that decision and responsible for it as the CEO of GM is in the lock cylinder decision.
 
Back
Top