Administration diverts from Hillary's role in Benghazi

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
I would have thought obama would have droned the guy while he was at a wedding. I mean now there is no going back on the "it was a youtube video" excuse.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,517
15,399
136
I would have thought obama would have droned the guy while he was at a wedding. I mean now there is no going back on the "it was a youtube video" excuse.

That's all you got? I would have thought that the fact they were looking for an actual suspect would have been the first clue that the Obama admin was going away from the youtube talking point.

Alas, I guess you were trying to be funny.
 

Zaap

Diamond Member
Jun 12, 2008
7,162
424
126
LOL! Hard to tell who's dumber in this thread, the dumb as a sack of rocks OP or the idiot libs getting trolled hard by the OP.

Too funny! Keep up the entertainment! :D
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,517
15,399
136
At this point, what difference does it make?
- Hillary rotten Clinton

It doesn't make any difference, they got one of the guys and recommended safety changes have been made.


Anyone else want to put there stupidity on display?
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
That's all you got? I would have thought that the fact they were looking for an actual suspect would have been the first clue that the Obama admin was going away from the youtube talking point.

Alas, I guess you were trying to be funny.

CNN found the suspect a year ago. Reuters found him 2 years ago.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,517
15,399
136
LOL! Hard to tell who's dumber in this thread, the dumb as a sack of rocks OP or the idiot libs getting trolled hard by the OP.

Too funny! Keep up the entertainment! :D

The OP? As in the poster that's mimicking a thread by you and your type? Yeah there is no contest in who is dumber! Thanks for coming to the party!
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,517
15,399
136
CNN found the suspect two years ago.

Congrats! Thanks for posting your ignorance!

Next time tell us how we should have caught him before evidence and a case could have been made against him. Let us know how you would have handled picking him up in a foreign, sovereign nation.

Or double down and show us just how dumb you are!
 
Last edited:

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,280
1
0
Oh look, it's another liberal who wants to ban anything that offends him or doesn't agree with his political views.

LOL I am chuckling at myself now for falling hard for this thread.. and not actually reading it and realizing the sarcasm.

Anyway I fully admit I am wearing the "dumb and dumber" T-shirt.. my bad
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
Congrats! Thanks for posting your ignorance!

Next time tell us how we should have caught before evidence and a case could have been made against him. Let us know how you would have handled picking him up in a foreign, sovereign nation.

Or double down and show us just how dumb you are!

Sovereign nation? You must be thinking of a different Libya. This guy should have been bagged a long time ago and sent to gitmo. If you recall the Feds wanted to try Khalid Shaihk Mohammed in New York. Bloomberg rebuffed him because of the circus it would have brung and the millions the city of New York would have to spend on security (An Eric Holder stamp on that one). Gitmo was fine for the turd that helped plan the 9-11-2001 attacks so it shold be fine for the newest turd. But I guess there is more press and we can't have the world seeing another trial at gitmo.
 

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
AH HA! The truth has been revealed! Time to start the impeaching!

\for 'merica and babby jee-bus!
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,517
15,399
136
Sovereign nation? You must be thinking of a different Libya. This guy should have been bagged a long time ago and sent to gitmo. If you recall the Feds wanted to try Khalid Shaihk Mohammed in New York. Bloomberg rebuffed him because of the circus it would have brung and the millions the city of New York would have to spend on security (An Eric Holder stamp on that one). Gitmo was fine for the turd that helped plan the 9-11-2001 attacks so it shold be fine for the newest turd. But I guess there is more press and we can't have the world seeing another trial at gitmo.

Hows that trial going fuck face? Are you done getting fucked in the ass by right wing propaganda?

Over the top response, even for P&N.

Perknose
Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,213
5,794
126
Benghazi is just a diversion from the real controversy, Obama's Birth Certificate!
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,503
50,656
136
Benghazi is just a diversion from the real controversy, Obama's Birth Certificate!

Pssh, the birth certificate is just a distraction from the IRS scandal, which is just a distraction from the economy, which is just a distraction from Benghazi, which is just a distraction from the birth certificate.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,517
15,399
136
Pssh, the birth certificate is just a distraction from the IRS scandal, which is just a distraction from the economy, which is just a distraction from Benghazi, which is just a distraction from the birth certificate.

Oh shit! You just went full circle!
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
31,363
9,236
136
The REAL America has had ENOUGH of Obama! Fox News is the largest cable news organization for a reason: we know the TRUTH; and mark my words, we'll vote Obama OUT in 2016.

Needs more "we the people", random capitalisation and exclamation marks. Possibly bad puns on Obamas name as well.

Other than that a nice spidey post. :thumbup:
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,600
4,698
136
At this point, what difference does it make?
- Hillary rotten Clinton


Oh, you're so clever. Now it's back to the basement gun bunker for you!

slow-motion-spiderman.gif
 
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
The Republicans are going to want to heap blame on Hillary. But what exactly was Hillary's role in the Benghazi attack? Does anyone honestly believe that a Secretary of State is going to be involved with day-today-day security details?
 

TerryMathews

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,464
2
0
The Republicans are going to want to heap blame on Hillary. But what exactly was Hillary's role in the Benghazi attack? Does anyone honestly believe that a Secretary of State is going to be involved with day-today-day security details?
As Secretary of State they are ultimately her facilities. She is as involved in that decision and responsible for it as the CEO of GM is in the lock cylinder decision.