Adblock vs Adblock plus

bononos

Diamond Member
Aug 21, 2011
3,939
190
106
It looks like there are 2 filtering addons for browsers.
The earlier adblock was said to have turned rogue by changing its open source model and phoning home a unique-id and other user details:
https://palant.de/2014/07/29/which-is-better-adblock-or-adblock-plus

The new adblock has also been accused of selling out and taking money from large corps to display their ads, google being one of them. Its hard to refuse money from google as even on AT, certain topics about google is controlled/censored.
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/15/02...osoft-reportedly-paid-adblock-plus-to-unblock

I still use adblockplus, which do you use?
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
Neither, I use Adguard (paid). They also have free extensions for Chrome, Opera and Firefox (and offshoots like Pale Moon).
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
The new adblock has also been accused of selling out and taking money from large corps to display their ads, google being one of them. Its hard to refuse money from google as even on AT, certain topics about google is controlled/censored.
You actually know very little about why a topic is off limits....
 

stockwiz

Senior member
Sep 8, 2013
403
15
81
ublock on chrome... adblock plus with element hiding helper on firefox. The first ad blocker that adds filters for those annoying popup javascript overlays automatically so I don't have to block them manually with element blockers will get my usage.

What adblock plus does to try and generate a bit of revenue for itself is relatively benign. You've been using something to make life on the internet bearable for years without donating to them and have the nerve to complain when they add a feature designed to make them a bit of cash, a feature that can easily be turned off in the settings?

In any case there are now several competitors... one of them should start blocking javascript overlays on all sites and they can take my money. I suppose I'm a hypocrite wanting to block those nasty overlays because those sites are just trying to make money... they don't want to do all that work for free and have server costs... I guess I'm not a perfect human being after all. :)
 
Last edited:

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,130
10,601
126
uBlock on Firefox. Development is a little weird right now, but I'll use it as long as it works.
 

WilliamM2

Platinum Member
Jun 14, 2012
2,978
876
136
I use plain old AdBlock. Haven't seen an ad since I started using years ago.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,130
10,601
126
ublocks lead developers have quit the project. there's a post about this at Wilders Security forums:

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/ublock-a-lean-and-fast-blocker.365273/unread

It's still being developed, both by Gorhill, and Chris something or other. That's why I said it's weird. It was abandoned to Chris, and then forked by Gorhill. I haven't made the time to figure out what's going on, but I'm still using the Gorhill version uBlock0(new name) updated two days ago.
 

Chiefcrowe

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2008
5,056
199
116
Hmm... where do you get ublock0 and is the original ublock abandoned now? what if we keep using it?


It's still being developed, both by Gorhill, and Chris something or other. That's why I said it's weird. It was abandoned to Chris, and then forked by Gorhill. I haven't made the time to figure out what's going on, but I'm still using the Gorhill version uBlock0(new name) updated two days ago.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,130
10,601
126
Hmm... where do you get ublock0 and is the original ublock abandoned now? what if we keep using it?

I'm on mobile right now, so research with links is kind of tedious. There's 2 active versions currently. The original uBlock which got turned over to a different dev, and uBlock0 which gorhill forked from the original(used to be his!).

At this point in time, they're almost exactly the same AFAIK. Going forward??? I don't know. In either case, either version should work as it does now until it doesn't. IOW, if you're happy with the way it works, it should continue to do so until Mozilla breaks compatibility with a future update. Which version imroves more over time can only be told when the future comes.
 

Chiefcrowe

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2008
5,056
199
116
Thanks for posting! Please keep us posted on any new developments you hear about or if one of the versions is discontinued or lags behind.

EDIT - from what I gather, ublock0 will probably be the one to go with in the future and will be updated more.
Also, if you get it from github, the extension will automatically update in firefox still, correct?
 
Last edited:

grimpr

Golden Member
Aug 21, 2007
1,095
7
81
Ublock Origin eclipses the competition. Available for Chrome and Firefox.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,130
10,601
126
Also, if you get it from github, the extension will automatically update in firefox still, correct?
Sorry, I didn't see this until today. I don't think uBlocko is on AMO. Your lists will update on their own, but you'll have to go to github for program updates.
 

Ketchup

Elite Member
Sep 1, 2002
14,559
248
106
I use ABE. I like it mainly because it doesn't "allow" the ads it "likes," and is easy to disable on sites like AT, that I want to support.
 

Hugh Jass

Golden Member
Nov 17, 2011
1,537
23
81
Re: Adblock Edge. Any more info on this, why it's being discontinued, etc.?

From the developer(s):

Discontinued in favor of uBlock, a general purpose blocker, that not only outperforms Adblock Edge but is also available on other browsers and, of course, without "Acceptable Ads Whitelist".