• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Active Shooting in San Bernardino, California

Page 30 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I am still waiting for how far above sea level was this sidewalk in Singapore.

Have a look yourself at low tide. That sidewalk had ankle deep water during high tide when it clearly did not before.

eastcoast01.jpg
 
It's the same for the left wing loonies too. They love extremist muslims but hate guns. How would they reconcile it as well? They want to let thousands of people in from ISIS areas and hand them green cards and welfare.. but what if they want guns? Can they stretch the white guilt/white privilege far enough to overwhelm their virulent dislike of the second amendment? They'll really need to push these guys rock bottom on the oppression ranking to abide by this, I think.
The left love extremist Muslims? Get the fuck out of here with this bullshit.
 
You should create a 2nd persona. Not joking.

I've seriously considered it. If I lose my job tomorrow I have to pack up and leave after spending 15+ years here, but it appears I might be eligible for DACA if I make up a fake persona. Did you know that being legally here actually disqualifies you for DACA even if you meet all other requirements? Liberal logic at its finest.
 
The thing is Syrians are generally not terrorists. But Pakistan is much more likely to be involved with terrorism. Just think about it...

The question is does that apply to Syrians overall, or to specific groups of Syrians, like the Alawites, Sunni, Christian, Druze, Kurds, or someone else?
 
Last edited:
I've seriously considered it. If I lose my job tomorrow I have to pack up and leave after spending 15+ years here, but it appears I might be eligible for DACA if I make up a fake persona. Did you know that being legally here actually disqualifies you for DACA even if you meet all other requirements? Liberal logic at its finest.
eff that. I would apply as a foreign refugee, asap. Heh, I may myself.:sneaky:
 
It's the same for the left wing loonies too. They love extremist muslims but hate guns. How would they reconcile it as well? They want to let thousands of people in from ISIS areas and hand them green cards and welfare.. but what if they want guns? Can they stretch the white guilt/white privilege far enough to overwhelm their virulent dislike of the second amendment? They'll really need to push these guys rock bottom on the oppression ranking to abide by this, I think.

Since you are stupid and probably incapable of understanding a simple concept, but no one loves extremists. Also Bill Maher is a fucking idiot and anyone who is intelligent can see that, so what is your excuse?
 
Last edited:
The left love extremist Muslims? Get the fuck out of here with this bullshit.

Sure they do. Just like they love gang members and hate white males. It's why every single time there's a mass shooting, you guys say "ENOUGH!" but you don't give a fuck about every weekend in Chicago. Obama doesn't. Harry Reid doesn't. Pelosi doesn't.

If these had been white males, it would been the fault of white males.

If these had been black males, it would have been the fault of white males.

Since these are muslims, it is the fault of white males.
 
Since you are stupid and probably incapable of understanding a simple concept, but no one loves extremists. Or wants them here.

Maybe *you* don't. You're pretty loony left, but maybe you draw the line here, IDK. Look at my response to Dank on the same topic.
 
Sure they do. Just like they love gang members and hate white males. It's why every single time there's a mass shooting, you guys say "ENOUGH!" but you don't give a fuck about every weekend in Chicago. Obama doesn't. Harry Reid doesn't. Pelosi doesn't.

If these had been white males, it would been the fault of white males.

If these had been black males, it would have been the fault of white males.

Since these are muslims, it is the fault of white males.

Liberal response contradiction:

White shooter: OMG OMG OMG gun laws restrictions NRA sucks etc etc
---> Understandable reaction, it's a horrible tragedy.

Islamic terrorism: Meh, America's fault, fast track refugees from ISIS land, etc.
----> Contradiction?! Shouldn't people from ISIS land go through more checks before being let in? Why no additional restrictions as demanded for case 1 above?


Same in reverse for you conservatives BTW, you guys want guns for everyone, and that includes Islamic extremists. Or are you guys proposing additional background checks on gun purchases by these guys?
 
There's nothing sophisticated about the ak, that's the major selling point of the ak.

Literally made for the lowest common denominator to be able to use and shoot it, which means it is made bulletproof, since the less it needs to be maintained and repaired, the easier it is for someone to use it. Not very accurate at range, but it was built as a classic assault rifle anyways, and not a mini battle rifle like the M16.
 
Sure they do. Just like they love gang members and hate white males. It's why every single time there's a mass shooting, you guys say "ENOUGH!" but you don't give a fuck about every weekend in Chicago. Obama doesn't. Harry Reid doesn't. Pelosi doesn't.

If these had been white males, it would been the fault of white males.

If these had been black males, it would have been the fault of white males.

Since these are muslims, it is the fault of white males.

And that's how you look like a conservaterrorist.

Did we make up shit like it didn't happen as you guys do with Sandy hook and that it's all a conspiracy?

Did we deny the fact that he was a Muslim?

How did they kill the co-workers? With a unholy cow or bad pork?

But you're denying that easy access to guns are partly to blame as they made his mission much easier.
 
And that's how you look like a conservaterrorist.

Did we make up shit like it didn't happen as you guys do with Sandy hook and that it's all a conspiracy?

Did we deny the fact that he was a Muslim?

How did they kill the co-workers? With a unholy cow or bad pork?

But you're denying that easy access to guns are partly to blame as they made his mission much easier.
dig it, dig it....
 
He is saying the level of daily high tide rose notably over the 6 years or so he was there.
Is that what he said? Language barrier....

Also...he was there...remember the elementary school history videos, You are there....😀

Edit: you if you were the guy sending screen shots to Perk?
 
Last edited:
And that's how you look like a conservaterrorist.

Did we make up shit like it didn't happen as you guys do with Sandy hook and that it's all a conspiracy?

Did we deny the fact that he was a Muslim?

How did they kill the co-workers? With a unholy cow or bad pork?

But you're denying that easy access to guns are partly to blame as they made his mission much easier.

No, it is how I look like a pragmatist.

What % of the population says Sandy Hook is a conspiracy? But hey, don't let that stop you from being bigoted against white men.

Who cares how they killed the coworkers. They were foreign terrorists and should have been apprehended long before. Didn't Obama just tell us that there was nothing wrong, no plans, no imminent danger? Didn't he just say that mass shootings don't happen in any other countries, just after muslims killed a bunch of people in Paris? He was too busy twittering about the clock to drive a muslim agenda. He was too busy comparing black heroes to his own kids.

What % of homicides, per year, are caused by white males with legal access to guns?

The problem isn't white men with guns. It is black men with guns. The 355 mass shootings were mostly caused by black men with guns. Illegal guns.

Yet you're more than willing to judge *ALL* white men by the actions of a few.

But fuck it if white men judge all muslims by the actions of a few, or black men by the actions of a few.
 
Last edited:
How the fuck should I know, it's not a river where you have a water line marker.

But I do know the difference between a nice walk on East Coast Park and this on the very same beach:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HUcQCvb23k

Give me a ballpark. Was it 6"? 1'?

Let's say the sidwalk was 1' above sealevel before. That means that sealevel raised 15" in 6 years.

Do you even understand what the fuck you are saying? Sealevel hasn't even raised 15" in 100 years.

Get the fuck outta here.
 
The problem isn't white men with guns. It is black men with guns. The 355 mass shootings were mostly caused by black men with guns. Illegal guns.
So it's a welfare issue where the Dad's were forced out of the house by a left policy so the children were raised by the women of the house and had no father figure roll models other than the fly by night boyfriends? +1




punctuation, they don't speak it.
 
Back
Top