Aborted babies incinerated to heat UK hospitals

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/h...-babies-incinerated-to-heat-UK-hospitals.html

The bodies of thousands of aborted and miscarried babies were incinerated as clinical waste, with some even used to heat hospitals, an investigation has found.

Ten NHS trusts have admitted burning foetal remains alongside other rubbish while two others used the bodies in ‘waste-to-energy’ plants which generate power for heat.
Last night the Department of Health issued an instant ban on the practice which health minister Dr Dan Poulter branded ‘totally unacceptable.’

At least 15,500 foetal remains were incinerated by 27 NHS trusts over the last two years alone, Channel 4’s Dispatches discovered.

The programme, which will air tonight, found that parents who lose children in early pregnancy were often treated without compassion and were not consulted about what they wanted to happen to the remains.

What a happy ending for these children.
 

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,883
641
126
My God, how can they do this! Surely this will contribute towards global warming climate change!
 

mikeymikec

Lifer
May 19, 2011
20,606
15,514
136
Much better that they be treated like human beings.

Do you find it shocking that dead human beings are often buried or cremated?


---

My only problem with the quoted text was that the parents weren't given a choice.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,158
32,588
136
So you're advocating they go to a landfill? Much more dignified to be sure.
No, Atreus will personally pay for funeral services for all of them. Parents won't be there, but as long as some pedophile reads some words from a book at least it will be dignified.
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
No, Atreus will personally pay for funeral services for all of them. Parents won't be there, but as long as some pedophile reads some words from a book at least it will be dignified.

Yeah, I can't protest defiling the remains of human children unless I'm willing to pay out of pocket to rectify it.

Don't like the holocaust? Pay money for a memorial or shut up.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,476
33,097
136
The water content of a freshly dead fetus would void it's utility as a fuel. Drying out the fetus to the point necessary for combustion of the carbohydrates in the fetus would require more energy than produced by said combustion. In other words, the fetii were not being used for fuel, they were being cremated, a common method for disposing of remains.

Short version: More word games from the fetus fetish folk.
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
The water content of a freshly dead fetus would void it's utility as a fuel. Drying out the fetus to the point necessary for combustion of the carbohydrates in the fetus would require more energy than produced by said combustion. In other words, the fetii were not being used for fuel, they were being cremated, a common method for disposing of remains.

"Ten NHS trusts have admitted burning foetal remains alongside other rubbish while two others used the bodies in ‘waste-to-energy’ plants which generate power for heat."
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,158
32,588
136
Yeah, I can't protest defiling the remains of human children unless I'm willing to pay out of pocket to rectify it.

Don't like the holocaust? Pay money for a memorial or shut up.
Defiling. Disposing. It's ok to burn them as long as the energy produced is not used as heat. That's the line. :rolleyes:
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,158
32,588
136
You're telling me there's some expense involved in not burning dead babies for fuel?
You think the foetal remains are going to separate themselves from the other medical waste? You think crematorium costs are the same as normal trash burning?
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
Defiling. Disposing. It's ok to burn them as long as the enegry produced is not used as heat. That's the line. :rolleyes:

...Uh, yes. Exactly. I guess I'm not surprised that I have to explain this, but there are some standards of humane-ness to which the disposal of human remains must conform. Using human remains for anything is wrong, and it's made all the worse by the fact that these are children.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,158
32,588
136
...Uh, yes. Exactly. I guess I'm not surprised that I have to explain this, but there are some standards of humane-ness to which the disposal of human remains must conform. Using human remains for anything is wrong, and it's made all the worse by the fact that these are children.
So you think they're sent there for their heating properties? And please detail for us exactly what these standards of humane-ness are.
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
You think the foetal remains are going to separate themselves from the other medical waste? You think crematorium costs are the same as normal trash burning?

Is it so much to ask that at the very least we don't use the bodies as fuel?