is LOST that show on abc that contains the 1 hour of commercials with bits of interruptions in between?
Fuck abc/disney.
Last edited:
techs
Lifer
- Sep 26, 2000
- 28,559
- 4
- 0
It will be interesting to see how they report this since Fox just had a similiar issue with another cable tv provider.
shortylickens
No Lifer
- Jul 15, 2003
- 80,287
- 17,081
- 136
I cant even remember the last time I watched broadcast TV. It must have been in May of 97, right before I joined the Navy.
As one of their customers I would rather CV piss all over ABC then jack up our bill because ABC demanded more money. If ABC were worth watching maybe they would make more money from their advertisers and this wouldn't be an issue.
techs
Lifer
- Sep 26, 2000
- 28,559
- 4
- 0
Yes, because when the free ota networks go out of business, Comcast will of course lower their prices.
NOT
MJinZ
Diamond Member
- Nov 4, 2009
- 8,192
- 0
- 0
Lost <- critically acclaimed
Modern Family <- best sitcom on TV bar none
Castle - refreshing
And popular ones I do not watch like:
Grey's Anatomy & spinoffs
Scrubs
Fox used to have the best line up, but this year they've stumbled. 24 sucks, Family guy sucked, Fringe sucks, etc.
They do still have some good shows like House, Human Target, Lie to Me, Glee, and I can't believe I still watch Hell's Kitchen but that show just makes salivate sometimes. ^_^
techs
Lifer
- Sep 26, 2000
- 28,559
- 4
- 0
Now that ota networks are beginning to get paid by cable networks I predict much better shows in the future.
Maybe I'm being a bit dense, but why can't Cablevision subscribers just watch the channel over the air via antenna?
Aharami
Lifer
- Aug 31, 2001
- 21,205
- 165
- 106
hah, i dont know enough about this to comment, but my sister-in-law work for abc disney (pretty low on the totem pole). I got to see her office in nyc a week or so ago. Man that must've been the nicest workplace Ive ever seen. It was like being in an art deco lounge complete with a ultra modern kitchen. From what she tells me, her bosses, all of them middle managers, make around quarter of a million dollars
Yes, because when the free ota networks go out of business, Comcast will of course lower their prices.
NOT
Who said anything about comcast?
No one said anything about lowering prices either. If ABC starts charging CV, who do you think is going to pay for that?
techs
Lifer
- Sep 26, 2000
- 28,559
- 4
- 0
In NYC you really need a roof antenna due to all the buildings. Some people can get decent ota without it, but most can't. When I lived in the Bronx I could get two channels that you could actually make out thru the all the static, but it was unwatchable.
DrPizza
Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
The story was on NPR repeatedly yesterday. Apparently, CV pays Disney (owns ABC) 200 million for the rights to broadcast ABC. Disney wants them to pay an extra 40 million or they'd shut it off.
Isn't ABC available over the air for free? CV should just build ota tuners into their cable boxes, wave the middle finger (also a story repeated several times on NPR yesterday), and save 200 million.
Isn't ABC available over the air for free? CV should just build ota tuners into their cable boxes, wave the middle finger (also a story repeated several times on NPR yesterday), and save 200 million.
I believe ABC took themselves off of Cablevision, not the other way around.
the OTA signal is still available, but who but the nerds have antennas for their digital tv's?
MJinZ
Diamond Member
- Nov 4, 2009
- 8,192
- 0
- 0
LOL, I have a 40" 1080P and I do not use cable. Pointless since I can download the series I want, Hulu everything else, and watch/play on the TV during "live" moments.
Cable is for suckers.
like I said.
your average 40+ year-old probably has no clue what hulu is or how to download tv shows via
usenet
TangoJuliet
Diamond Member
- Jul 2, 2006
- 5,595
- 1
- 76
I can see both sides in the matter
ABC says CV charges $18/m for basic TV which people can get FREE via OTA. That $18 doesn't go back into the pockets of any of the networks.
CV says they pay ABC/Disney $200 million for the rights to broadcast basically everything ESPN/Disney and in the deal ABC is thrown in for free. They don't want to pass down the $40 million dollar increase to its customers.
The real losers are the people. For me, CV is the only cable provider in the area. Fios is not available yet and TW is not on Long Island. I hate all of this monopoly crap and how networks are now holding the viewers hostage. Seriously didn't they learn anything with the music industry and napster?
If it wasn't for my wife and how much she loves Food Network, Bravo, Lifetime, etc I'd cancel all of that crap and download whatever I wanted or watched online without the hassle of a cable provider.
ABC says CV charges $18/m for basic TV which people can get FREE via OTA. That $18 doesn't go back into the pockets of any of the networks.
CV says they pay ABC/Disney $200 million for the rights to broadcast basically everything ESPN/Disney and in the deal ABC is thrown in for free. They don't want to pass down the $40 million dollar increase to its customers.
The real losers are the people. For me, CV is the only cable provider in the area. Fios is not available yet and TW is not on Long Island. I hate all of this monopoly crap and how networks are now holding the viewers hostage. Seriously didn't they learn anything with the music industry and napster?
If it wasn't for my wife and how much she loves Food Network, Bravo, Lifetime, etc I'd cancel all of that crap and download whatever I wanted or watched online without the hassle of a cable provider.
techs
Lifer
- Sep 26, 2000
- 28,559
- 4
- 0
Well, other "networks" that have a few cable channels don't have to give one to CV for free, do they? And, local channels are a main reason many people get cable, since they can't get reception, or because its included in their cable. Look at how many people didn't get satellite before they had local channels.
IIRC under the law, there is a "must carry" rule that says cable companies must carry any ota within a certain distance. This was instituted to protect ota from the monoply that is cable television from putting them off the air, to further their monoply. And because it was obvious the cable companies as a monoply could deal unfairly with ota's.
However, there is nothing in the law that says the cable companies have to pay the ota networks. So if an ota wants money and the cable company doesn't pay then its the ota that is really putting itself off the cable.
Lastly, the cable company is using its monoply against ota's that would be prosecuted if they did the same thing. Clearly, if all the ota's in an area got together and said pay us or you can't carry us, the cable companies would lose scads of customers because the local channels are the most watched and demanded channels. Just ask Direct TV how important they are. But the ota's are prohibited from acting in unison by anti trust laws. The cable companies ar exempt because they have a government granted monoply.
Last edited:
Anubis
No Lifer
other then the STFU show none of that is worth watching and the STFU show is on other networks
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 22K
-
News NVIDIA and Intel to Develop AI Infrastructure and Personal Computing Products- Started by poke01
- Replies: 384
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
Facebook
Twitter