- Jul 27, 2002
- 13,314
- 690
- 126
http://img74.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lol6fd.jpg
Hope this will reduce the number of threads asking "which is better?"
Hope this will reduce the number of threads asking "which is better?"
Originally posted by: TSS
sorry but no. only thing that proves is that a ~$800 X2 (4800+) can perform as well as a ~$300 dollar opteron (165).
which puts it more in favor of the opteron.
but it can be argued that the X2 isnt atleast as good.
even if you'd pull that off with a 3800+ X2 theres the cache thing.
only thing that would be even would be a X2 4400+ compared to a similar priced opteron (so the 170 or 175).
not bad OC's + scores tho.
Originally posted by: JustAnAverageGuy
279x10 and 310x9.
Originally posted by: lopri
The point is, given same clock/cache size, A64 and Opteron will perform equally on day-to-day use.
Originally posted by: RussianSensation
Originally posted by: lopri
The point is, given same clock/cache size, A64 and Opteron will perform equally on day-to-day use.
Isn't that obvious? Because Optreron, FX and A64 are all identical in architecture.
Originally posted by: RussianSensation
Originally posted by: lopri
The point is, given same clock/cache size, A64 and Opteron will perform equally on day-to-day use.
Isn't that obvious? Because Optreron, FX and A64 are all identical in architecture.
Originally posted by: JustAnAverageGuy
Lopri:
Would you might posting a screenshot of the motherboard tab in CPU-Z? Also, do you have any problem with your A8N-SLI Premium occasionally not booting up if the HTT is around 300?