The force is strong in this one...Originally posted by: Gulzakar
Mount Vesuvius, Plague, Small Pox, War (indirectly so), etc...
you ever think this is natures way of dealing with imbalance?
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
What tidal wave?
Both terms have been used to describe the catastrophe that struck during the weekend. Are they interchangeable?
Apparently "tidal wave" has been on the wane since 1963, when "tsunami" was adopted for general use by an international scientific conference.
Here are the distinctions, as noted by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the U.S. Geological Survey. First, from NOAA: "tsunami (pronounced 'soo-nah-mee') is a series of waves of extremely long wave length and long period generated in a body of water by an impulsive disturbance that vertically displaces the water. ... Tsunami is a Japanese word represented by two characters: 'tsu' and 'nami.' The character 'tsu' means harbor, and the character 'nami' means wave. In the past, tsunamis were often referred to as 'tidal waves.' The term 'tidal wave' is a misnomer. Tides are the result of gravitational influences of the moon, sun, and planets. Tsunamis are not caused by the tides and are unrelated to the tides; although a tsunami striking a coastal area is influenced by the tide level at the time of impact."
Nevertheless, elsewhere on its Web site NOAA terms a tidal wave "a huge destructive wave," and "an unusually high water level along shore. Refers to a storm surge or Tsunami."
One contributor to NOAA's Web site takes note of tidal wave's customary usage: "The terms 'tsunami' and 'tidal wave' mean the same thing. ... 'Tidal wave' is most often seen in reproductions of old news reports and older text books."
The U.S. Geological Survey also prefers "tsunami," but says they are "sometimes referred to as 'tidal waves' and 'seismic sea waves.' The term 'tidal wave' is a misnomer.
The impact of a tsunami upon a coastline is partially dependent upon the tidal level at the time it strikes, but its generation is unrelated to ocean tides."
Originally posted by: Gulzakar
I think the earth is pissed off
but thats just me![]()
I think the earth is pissed off
but thats just me
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah it is just you, ever think something might be wrong with you?
Originally posted by: PanzerIV
I have to agree with the consensus of opinion that on this living planet (living meaning our planet is never at rest internally or externally) natural disasaster have always and will always occur with no regard to any design. I remember watching something a few years ago that some type of cataclysmic event in prehistoric time almost decimated the human population. Our already sparse numbers were vastly reduced. I do not recall what the even was or even how it's suggested scientists could know this but it was either on the Learning Channel or Discovery Channel.
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
The formation of a tsunami has nothing to do with people. If you want to see natural disasters that result from human activity, look at hurricanes, drought, flooding, etc. These have all become worse over the last century due to global warming.
Originally posted by: shimsham
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
The formation of a tsunami has nothing to do with people. If you want to see natural disasters that result from human activity, look at hurricanes, drought, flooding, etc. These have all become worse over the last century due to global warming.
what? weve only been able to reliable keep stats for the past 150 yrs or so. hardly long enough to determine mans role in any way. how do you know that there were more hurricanes on the eastern coast in 2004 than in 0004?
What you say is true, but that doesen't mean what you believe is true.Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: shimsham
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
The formation of a tsunami has nothing to do with people. If you want to see natural disasters that result from human activity, look at hurricanes, drought, flooding, etc. These have all become worse over the last century due to global warming.
what? weve only been able to reliable keep stats for the past 150 yrs or so. hardly long enough to determine mans role in any way. how do you know that there were more hurricanes on the eastern coast in 2004 than in 0004?
I did some research and it turns out that the recent hurricanes can't be blamed on global warming.
http://www.cnn.com/NATURE/9909/17/floyd.global.warming/
http://www.techcentralstation.com/091404D.html
Apparently hurricanes will be intensified with continued warming according to NOAA.
http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/~tk/glob_warm_hurr.html
Flood and drought though result when you alter the heat "conveyor belts". The recent erratic behavior of El Nino is an example.
Originally posted by: aplefka
Originally posted by: Doggiedog
Nope.
Its just us adjusting to the Earth not the other way around. If we can't adjust, we die. Simple as that.
I think you bring up something that many people have forgotten. The planet was here for just a little bit longer than us. That's why sometimes it pisses me off to hear the way people talk now, and the way they take things for granted. I'm no activist for anything, but at the same time, if we continue down the path we're going, we're gonna be fvcked in 50 years or so.
Originally posted by: Gulzakar
aren't their sonar beacons that detect these things? I think Hawaii is surrounded by them.
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
The formation of a tsunami has nothing to do with people. If you want to see natural disasters that result from human activity, look at hurricanes, drought, flooding, etc. These have all become worse over the last century due to global warming.
