• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

A physics/computer question about TRON 2.0

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Ancalagon44

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2010
3,274
202
106
Ah but even modelling it at the quantum level would be an abstraction since there are layers below of that, some of which we probably have yet to discover. Hence, theoretically its possible.

Of course, why you even think it matters is beyond me since a MOVIE. Hence, not related to reality at all.
 

bmews

Junior Member
Mar 22, 2011
9
0
0
I put someone's brain on a floppy disk once. Ruined the disk.

/theflyingpig

Anyone still remember a long time ago HP had an artificially intelligent Mopy Fish screensaver that fit on a floppy disk? I always wondered if the Fish was in an alive or dead state when on the floppy disk lying dormant.
 

bmews

Junior Member
Mar 22, 2011
9
0
0
Ah but even modelling it at the quantum level would be an abstraction since there are layers below of that, some of which we probably have yet to discover. Hence, theoretically its possible.

Of course, why you even think it matters is beyond me since a MOVIE. Hence, not related to reality at all.

Well some say the physical universe itself is entirely an abstraction and in fact it is simply qualia encoded in such a way (raw awareness constrained by the mathematical 'fire in the equations') that gives rise to the physicality of the so called physical world.
 

Lifted

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2004
5,748
2
0
Wow, I thought ever everyone knew this one.

Humans only use 10% of their brains potential which means it takes much less CPU power to simulate it. I'm not sure how much less, but it's probably a lot!
 

jmolayal

Senior member
Apr 21, 2001
405
0
76
High_Tron.jpg

This is the greatest response I have ever seen to a thread. I tip my hat to you, sir.
 

bunnyfubbles

Lifer
Sep 3, 2001
12,248
3
0
A. you failed to account for the fact that this is a sequel and thus utterly failed to answer many of your own questions by watching that movie first

B. this movie and its predecessor are just that - movies, and fantastical works of fiction at that
 

cerebusPu

Diamond Member
May 27, 2000
4,008
0
0
did you think about how olivia wilde was able to make the leap from virtual to physical world? think about the physics of that! come back when you get the answer.
 

Bryf50

Golden Member
Nov 11, 2006
1,429
51
91
Does it really matter? The only reason to watch this movie is to see Olivia Wilde with short hair :wub:.
 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
did you think about how olivia wilde was able to make the leap from virtual to physical world? think about the physics of that! come back when you get the answer.

I think the better question is what would have happened if that floating aircraft carrier thing had gone from virtual to physical.