Specop 007
Diamond Member
- Jan 31, 2005
- 9,454
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Enig101
I think it's sort of ridiculous to lump the Bill of Rights together. It is quite easy to perceive that the Right to Bear Arms is outdated. That does not mean that other parts of the Bill of Rights are invalid. I don't see why it has to be "all or nothing". The Bill of Rights is just a set of amendments, no?
As for this thread, I am moderate/liberal and I can clearly see the original post is provocative.
Because if you tamper with one it opens the door to tamper with them all, get it?
If (for example) YOU say "Well, its outdated to own firearms" you can damn well bet the next guy is going to say "Well, with the WoT its outdated to have privacy" and down the slope we go.
