• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

A-10

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: waggy
man i have always loved hte A-10. just an amazing machine. IT not only takes massive damage but can deal it out!

to bad they are phazing it out.

Havn't heard that, they have another dedicated close air support plane on the roadmap? All I'm aware of are the F-22 taking the superiority role from the F-15 and the F-35 taking the zergling role from the F-16 (and B767 varients taking up AWACS, tanker and transport roles from the B707 family)

I read they're supposed to be around til 2025.
 
Imagine if they updated it further with advanced ground targeting systems similar to the Apache Longbow. If they could track and target multiple tanks at one time and release a barrage of Hellfire missles from a distance, they'd be the ultimate ground warfare machine.
 
Originally posted by: NiKeFiDO
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
A-10s are awesome.....the depleted uranium shells the cannon fires are as bug as a coke bottle. It can fly missing half a wing, one engine, and a stabilizer IIRC.

anyone else remember the game A-10 thunderbolts? it may only have been a Macintosh game.....


yeah I remember that game, I used to spend hours on it when I was a kid...
 
Originally posted by: Rogue
Don't Google search for p-38 even with safesearch on for that matter, unless you want to see a 2-inch cannon on the front of an old battle hardened jackass. 😀

Sorry, didn't try safe search on to see if that skipped mr. p38
 
Originally posted by: OdiN
Originally posted by: YOyoYOhowsDAjello
P-38 lightning

omfg, don't google image search for p-38 with safe search off.

QFT

That's my favorite plane...also like the F4U Corsair.

Thinking back I think my grandfather worked at a manufacturing plant making grumman hellcats durring WWII. He died before I was born, so I'm not sure on that as I never met him and have only heard a couple things about him.

(Corsair reminded me of it)
 
Awesome tank killer...the best all around ground attack aircraft.

Questions have been raised abt those depleted uraniums...hopefully, it won't produce environmental or health hazards as alleged by some "concern organizations"

For me, they're meant to kill so be it...just don't want our soldiers handling these ammunitions getting some unknown sickness as a consequence. Remember Agent Orange in Vietnam or the unexplained malady that afflicted the veterans of the first Gulf war.

__________________________________________________________________________

Really don't understand "The Pentagon A$$ or Brass"why they wanted to retire this plane when it was the best ground attack aircraft that supported our grunts.
 
SR-71 is my favorite airplane.

But the A-10 is definatly cool.

Little trivia, anyone knows it official "name"? For example, the SR-71 (which was originally designated the RS-71 unitl a presidentail misspeak) is called the Blackbird...what is the A-10 called?
 
A-10 is officially the A-10 Thunderbolt II


Interestingly enough, I've heard it said that the forward movement of the aircraft actually stops momentarily when the cannon if fired....surely that can't be true.
 
Originally posted by: Mrvile
WAMAMAMAMAMAMA goes the cannons...

BOOM goes the tanks!

Warthog to the rescue!

Nope, it doesn't go whamamamamamamama.

It goes WHIIRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR, sounds like a motor apparently.
 
Originally posted by: Tyrant222
heard they built the gun, then the plane around it.

Just like the Germans did with the deadly 88. Built the cannon, then they built the tank around it. Unlike the Allies who build the tank, then built the gun for the tank.

 
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
A-10 is officially the A-10 Thunderbolt II


Interestingly enough, I've heard it said that the forward movement of the aircraft actually stops momentarily when the cannon if fired....surely that can't be true.

No. It doesn't.
 
Bonus points to the first person who correctly explains why the A-10 doesn't expend the empty cartridges from it's gun. 2 main reasons...
 
Originally posted by: Rudee
Bonus points to the first person who correctly explains why the A-10 doesn't expend the empty cartridges from it's gun. 2 main reasons...


they are reused. They are expensive aluminum alloy to reduce weight

and I imagine they'd make a nasty sound if sucked back through the turbine
 
Originally posted by: Horus
Originally posted by: Mrvile
WAMAMAMAMAMAMA goes the cannons...

BOOM goes the tanks!

Warthog to the rescue!

Nope, it doesn't go whamamamamamamama.

It goes WHIIRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR, sounds like a motor apparently.

And listening from the ground the WHIIRRRR comes after the boom.
 
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
Originally posted by: Rudee
Bonus points to the first person who correctly explains why the A-10 doesn't expend the empty cartridges from it's gun. 2 main reasons...


they are reused. They are expensive aluminum alloy to reduce weight

and I imagine they'd make a nasty sound if sucked back through the turbine


I'll give you half points. One reason is that the empty cartridges are kept onboard as ballast. Second reason is that because it is a close support aircraft, the expended ammunition would rain down on the heads of friendly forces, knocking them unconcious by the sheer weight and volume of expended shells.

 
Originally posted by: Rudee
I'll give you half points. One reason is that the empty cartridges are kept onboard as ballast. Second reason is that because it is a close support aircraft, the expended ammunition would rain down on the heads of friendly forces, knocking them unconcious by the sheer weight and volume of expended shells.

my country's army wears helmets so I don't see what the problem is... 😉

I thought the real reason was that there's a 10 cent deposit refund for each one you bring back.
 
Back
Top