Blackjack200
Lifer
- May 28, 2007
- 15,995
- 1,688
- 126
What mechanism of action would be shared between treating the two scenarios?
Controlling access to guns.
What mechanism of action would be shared between treating the two scenarios?
Hopefully people hold the media responsible for their role:
http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/d...t?oid=20329038Quote:
For years, forensic psychiatrists have been urging American journalists to reform the way they report on these incidents. In a 2009 BBC interview, perhaps the best known among those psychiatrists, Dr. Park Dietz, said: Weve had 20 years of mass murders throughout which I have repeatedly told CNN and our other media, if you dont want to propagate more mass murders, dont start the story with sirens blaring. Dont have photographs of the killer. Dont make this 24/7 coverage. Do everything you can not to make the body count the lead story, not to make the killer some kind of anti-hero. Do localize the story to the affected community and make it as boring as possible in every other market. Because every time we have intense saturation coverage of a mass murder, we expect to see one or two more within a week.
http://www.ksat.com/news/fbi-to-medi...-mass-shootersQuote:
Researchers at Texas State University have found many of the shooters are partially motivated by fame and have looked to past shooters for inspiration.
Now the FBI is encouraging media organizations to rethink the way they cover these stories by not focusing as much attention on the shooters. They call it the "Don't Name Them" campaign.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/02/health...illings-study/Quote:
Researchers gathered records of school shootings and mass killings from several data sets and fit them into a mathematical "contagion model." The spread they found was not dependent on location, leading researchers to believe that national media coverage of a mass shooting might play a role. On average, mass shootings occur about once every two weeks in the United States and school shootings happen about once a month, the study said.
"What we believe may be happening is national news media attention is like a 'vector' that reaches people who are vulnerable," said Sherry Towers, a research professor at Arizona State University and lead author of the study.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014...81702252120052Quote:
A 1999 study by Dr. Mullen and others in the Archives of Suicide Research suggested that a 10-year outbreak of mass homicides had occurred in clusters rather than randomly. This effect was also found in a 2002 study by a group of German psychiatrists who examined 132 attempted rampage killings world-wide. There is a growing consensus among researchers that, whether or not the perpetrators are fully aware of it, they are following what has become a ready-made, free-floating template for young men to resolve their rage and express their sense of personal grandiosity.
Whatever the witch's brew of influences that produced this grisly script, treating mass killings as a kind of epidemic or contagion largely frees us from having to understand the particular causes of each act. Instead, we can focus on disrupting the spread.
There is a precedent for this approach in dealing with another form of violence: suicides. A 2003 study led by Columbia University psychiatrist Madelyn Gould found "ample evidence" of a suicide contagion effect, fed by reports in the media. A 2011 study in the journal BMC Public Health found, unsurprisingly, that this effect is especially strong for novel forms of suicide that receive outsize attention in the press.
Some researchers have even put the theory to the test. In 1984, a rash of suicides broke out on the subway system in Vienna. As the death toll climbed, a group of researchers at the Austrian Association for Suicide Prevention theorized that sensational reporting was inadvertently glorifying the suicides. Three years into the epidemic, the researchers persuaded local media to change their coverage by minimizing details and photos, avoiding romantic language and simplistic explanations of motives, moving the stories from the front page and keeping the word "suicide" out of the headlines. Subway suicides promptly dropped by 75%.
But far be it for us to follow the advice of experts - got to get those ratings!
Controlling access to guns.
OK, how do you propose to do that in each stage?
People target gun-free zones? You don't say? Well, do away with gun-free zones.
It wasn't a gun free zone? You don't say?
http://www.ammoland.com/2015/10/shooting-at-gun-free-umpqua-community-college-oregon/#axzz3nNyKt2TU
"Umpqua Community College is a posted Gun Free Zone"
Just another day in the USA. God Bless.
Nothing could have prevented this. If it wasn't a gun, he would have killed and wounded dozens of people with a knife.
Aside from the gun control talking points, here is a development in the case which could stir up some discussion:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/02/us/oregon-umpqua-community-college-shooting/index.html
Someone is reporting that the gunman "singled out Christians" because he lined people up against a wall, then asked if they were Christian. If they said yes, he said "Good because you're a Christian, you're going to see God in just about one second," then shot each in the head.
I think this might be a bit garbled because it doesn't actually say what the shooter did if they said "no." It also seems likely that no one would say yes after they saw what happened to the first one who said yes. Perhaps we'll have a clearer picture when more comes in.
As I recall, something similar was alleged early on in the reporting of the Columbine shooting. That turned out to be false, IIRC. It will take some time for an accurate picture of the events to unfold.
Controlling access to guns.
Because it has worked so well in places like NYC, DC or Chicago. How many have been shot in the past two weekends in Chicago?
On the lines of the media hyping these things for ratings, the other reason they won't change their coverage tactics is they get advertising money from the pharmaceutical industry. How many of these mass shooters were on some psychotropic drug? Many of them. Media doesn't mention that often. Doesn't fit the narrative and would hurt their advertising budget.
The 2nd is going to stand in the way of any major, far-reaching gun control. Even some of the recent laws that have been enacted by some states are not constitutional and will be wound back.
So, either you push for a repeal of the 2nd, or go about this in some other manner. It's pretty obvious that a huge number of these mass shootings occur at gun free zones. The gun free signs are, I think, completely pointless.
This guy was a loser but it doesn't look like there were yet any massive warning flags. There are tons of total losers with many guns who never do anything like this.
