9 dead, 9 wounded, shooter killed at Oregon community college

Oct 16, 1999
10,490
4
0
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/01/us/oregon-college-shooting/index.html

Edit: Body count updated. :(
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/01/us-usa-shooting-oregon-idUSKCN0RV5EP20151001

Edit 2: Number keeps changing, leaving it there until finalized.

Edit: 3:
A gunman opened fire on Thursday at a community college in Oregon, killing 13 people and wounding some 20 others, in the latest mass killing to rock a U.S. school, officials and local media said.

There were conflicting reports on the number of casualties and wounded at Umpqua Community College. The state's attorney general told the local NBC affiliate that 13 people had been slain, 20 wounded and the shooter was killed.

The suspect was not identified but CNN reported it was a man in his late 20s.

Edit 4: I assume the numbers are now final. Names of those killed:

●Lucero Alcaraz, 19, of Roseburg

●Quinn Glen Cooper, 18, of Roseburg

●Kim Saltmarsh Dietz, 59, of Roseburg

●Lucas Eibel, 18, of Roseburg

●Jason Dale Johnson, 33, of Winston

●Lawrence Levine, 67, of Glide, a teacher

●Sarena Dawn Moore, 44, of Myrtle Creek

●Treven Taylor Anspach, 20, of Sutherlin

●Rebecka Ann Carnes, 18, of Myrtle Creek

RIP
 
Last edited:

unokitty

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2012
3,346
1
0
Live news feed reports shooter is 'down.' No longer an active shooter situation...

http://www.katu.com/news/live

No official casuality stats available...

Now, reporting 10 KIA, multiple wounded...

Uno
 
Last edited:

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Nothing could have prevented this. If it wasn't a gun, he would have killed and wounded dozens of people with a knife.
 

sm625

Diamond Member
May 6, 2011
8,172
137
106
Bring out the gun grabbers. Guns for none and anti psychotics for all!

Nothing could have prevented this. If it wasn't a gun, he would have killed and wounded dozens of people with a knife.

Naw, that's what SUVs are for. Ever read Mr Mercedes?
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Bring out the gun grabbers. Guns for none and anti psychotics for all!



Naw, that's what SUVs are for. Ever read Mr Mercedes?

Yep, almost certainly the next deliberate mass killing will be by a car. It happens just as often as shootings, so next one will be vehicular for sure.
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
20,553
3,714
126
Nothing could have prevented this. If it wasn't a gun, he would have killed and wounded dozens of people with a knife.

Hopefully people hold the media responsible for their role:
For years, forensic psychiatrists have been urging American journalists to reform the way they report on these incidents. In a 2009 BBC interview, perhaps the best known among those psychiatrists, Dr. Park Dietz, said: “We’ve had 20 years of mass murders throughout which I have repeatedly told CNN and our other media, if you don’t want to propagate more mass murders, don’t start the story with sirens blaring. Don’t have photographs of the killer. Don’t make this 24/7 coverage. Do everything you can not to make the body count the lead story, not to make the killer some kind of anti-hero. Do localize the story to the affected community and make it as boring as possible in every other market. Because every time we have intense saturation coverage of a mass murder, we expect to see one or two more within a week.”
http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/does-media-coverage-of-school-shootings-lead-to-more-school-shootings/Content?oid=20329038

Researchers at Texas State University have found many of the shooters are partially motivated by fame and have looked to past shooters for inspiration.

Now the FBI is encouraging media organizations to rethink the way they cover these stories by not focusing as much attention on the shooters. They call it the "Don't Name Them" campaign.
http://www.ksat.com/news/fbi-to-media-dont-name-mass-shooters

R
esearchers gathered records of school shootings and mass killings from several data sets and fit them into a mathematical "contagion model." The spread they found was not dependent on location, leading researchers to believe that national media coverage of a mass shooting might play a role. On average, mass shootings occur about once every two weeks in the United States and school shootings happen about once a month, the study said.

"What we believe may be happening is national news media attention is like a 'vector' that reaches people who are vulnerable," said Sherry Towers, a research professor at Arizona State University and lead author of the study.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/02/health/contagious-mass-killings-study/

A 1999 study by Dr. Mullen and others in the Archives of Suicide Research suggested that a 10-year outbreak of mass homicides had occurred in clusters rather than randomly. This effect was also found in a 2002 study by a group of German psychiatrists who examined 132 attempted rampage killings world-wide. There is a growing consensus among researchers that, whether or not the perpetrators are fully aware of it, they are following what has become a ready-made, free-floating template for young men to resolve their rage and express their sense of personal grandiosity.

Whatever the witch's brew of influences that produced this grisly script, treating mass killings as a kind of epidemic or contagion largely frees us from having to understand the particular causes of each act. Instead, we can focus on disrupting the spread.

There is a precedent for this approach in dealing with another form of violence: suicides. A 2003 study led by Columbia University psychiatrist Madelyn Gould found "ample evidence" of a suicide contagion effect, fed by reports in the media. A 2011 study in the journal BMC Public Health found, unsurprisingly, that this effect is especially strong for novel forms of suicide that receive outsize attention in the press.

Some researchers have even put the theory to the test. In 1984, a rash of suicides broke out on the subway system in Vienna. As the death toll climbed, a group of researchers at the Austrian Association for Suicide Prevention theorized that sensational reporting was inadvertently glorifying the suicides. Three years into the epidemic, the researchers persuaded local media to change their coverage by minimizing details and photos, avoiding romantic language and simplistic explanations of motives, moving the stories from the front page and keeping the word "suicide" out of the headlines. Subway suicides promptly dropped by 75%.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303309504579181702252120052

But far be it for us to follow the advice of experts - got to get those ratings!
 
Oct 16, 1999
10,490
4
0
Do you have that shit saved to copy/paste? The media has every responsibility to report on active shootings and the immediate aftermath.
 

Blackjack200

Lifer
May 28, 2007
15,995
1,688
126

So in all the other countries where this kind of thing is a rarity, they don't cover mass shootings in the news?
 

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
Do you have that shit saved to copy/paste? The media has every responsibility to report on active shootings and the immediate aftermath.

Yes. And society must accept that reporting is going to mean more copy cats. Every time a shooter writes a note, or leaves a video, society wants to see it. There would be far less mass shootings if there was not the type of reporting done.

The media is just showing what we want. If we did not want all the little details, they would likely not show it. Shooters would thus not get fame and there would be less.
 
Oct 16, 1999
10,490
4
0
Yes. And society must accept that reporting is going to mean more copy cats. Every time a shooter writes a note, or leaves a video, society wants to see it. There would be far less mass shootings if there was not the type of reporting done.

The media is just showing what we want. If we did not want all the little details, they would likely not show it. Shooters would thus not get fame and there would be less.

Spare me the bullshit. You types just want the media not to cover these because it makes assholes with guns look bad.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Spare me the bullshit. You types just want the media not to cover these because it makes assholes with guns look bad.

Im pretty sure assholes that shoot people look bad regardless. Or are you labeling millions of Americans assholes because of people like this guy\gal?
 

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,856
3,808
136
Nothing could have prevented this. If it wasn't a gun, he would have killed and wounded dozens of people with a knife.

If knives were as easy to kill lots of people with as guns, then armies would still be using swords.