9/11 Loose Change Final Cut Released Online

[jpeyton]

Watch It Here

Completely remade since the second edition release. Lots of new video clips of our government and intelligence officials backtracking and covering up intelligence that conflicted with the "official" position of our government (9/11, Osama, Terror).

Runtime is 130 minutes, but definitely worth watching.

 

[ProfJohn]

Worth watching if you are a kook. Or did they get rid of some of their more stupid statements such as missiles being fired at the WTC or the Pentagon being hit by a cruise missile?

 

[Pabster]

Great, more kook propaganda. :roll:

 

[TastesLikeChicken]

Which one is this? Loose Change Final Cut 16?

 

[Tab]

Not this shit again...

9/11 Myths De-Bunked
Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics
Maddox vs. Loose Change

I'm done.

 

[jpeyton]

Originally posted by: Tab
Not this shit again...

Those links are a few years old. Lots of stuff in the Final Cut is brand new.

Why did our government cover up Pakistani ISI involvement with the hijackers? A member of the ISI sent $100,000 to Atta right before 9/11.

 

[TastesLikeChicken]

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: Tab
Not this shit again...

Those links are a few years old. Lots of stuff in the Final Cut is brand new.

Why did our government cover up Pakistani ISI involvement with the hijackers? A member of the ISI sent $100,000 to Atta right before 9/11.

If our government covered it up how do the Loose Change guys know about it in the first place? Somehow the same government that was allegedly involved in pulling off 9/11 without anyone coming forward and admitting to being part and parcel and explaining their role in this grand conspiracy couldn't shut up a single ISI guy?

Not likely.

 

[NoStateofMind]

Looks like the government shills are out in full armor tonight.

Thanks for this OP. Watching now

 

[ProfJohn]

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: Tab
Not this shit again...

Those links are a few years old. Lots of stuff in the Final Cut is brand new.

Why did our government cover up Pakistani ISI involvement with the hijackers? A member of the ISI sent $100,000 to Atta right before 9/11.

The ISI is a mess. No one at all would be surprised to learn that parts of it were supporting AQ or the Taliban. These are the same people that warned Osama that the cruise missiles were on the way perhaps saving his life.

 

[ProfJohn]

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Looks like the government shills are out in full armor tonight.

Thanks for this OP. Watching now

And you wonder why people don?t take the Ron Paul bots serious.

 

[NoStateofMind]

Originally posted by: ProfJohn

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Looks like the government shills are out in full armor tonight.

Thanks for this OP. Watching now

And you wonder why people don?t take the Ron Paul bots serious.

I could personally take a shit and care as much about that as I do your opinion of me.

Hey you government shill guys are missing one, where is palehorse?

 

[shiner]

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: Tab
Not this shit again...

Those links are a few years old. Lots of stuff in the Final Cut is brand new.

Why did our government cover up Pakistani ISI involvement with the hijackers? A member of the ISI sent $100,000 to Atta right before 9/11.

That's the great thing about fiction...you can make up new stuff anytime you want.

 

[jpeyton]

Originally posted by: ProfJohn
The ISI is a mess. No one at all would be surprised to learn that parts of it were supporting AQ or the Taliban. These are the same people that warned Osama that the cruise missiles were on the way perhaps saving his life.

Right, but that doesn't answer why the administration and the 9/11 Commission buried the fact that the ISI was involved.

Why did they do it? To protect their allies in Pakistan? To keep support fully behind their war in Afghanistan when the problem was actually in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan?

 

[Mavtek3100]

Don't watch this! It's kook shit! Everything is fine! Everything is FINE!!!!!!!!!! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHh

Get off the internet! We have good shows on TV!

 

[Pabster]

Isn't it interesting that many of the Paulbots are 9/11 Kooks as well?

And you guys wonder, as Prof mentioned, why you aren't taken seriously.

It's sad, because Paul suffers from your delusion and paranoia. (And I'm talking effects on his campaign, not that he himself is of that mindset)

 

[TastesLikeChicken]

Originally posted by: Pabster
Isn't it interesting that many of the Paulbots are 9/11 Kooks as well?

And you guys wonder, as Prof mentioned, why you aren't taken seriously.

It's sad, because Paul suffers from your delusion and paranoia. (And I'm talking effects on his campaign, not that he himself is of that mindset)

I don't know if it's interesting, but it is telling.

Do you know that if you literally take the phrase "There's a sucker born every minute." and apply it to the average annual birthrate in the US over the last 4 decades it accounts for nearly every Ron Paul supporter in the US?

 

[bamacre]

I am not going to waste the time watching it. If for only one reason, that reason is that even IF there is significant evidence of a cover-up, then what? Then nothing. People still wouldn't want to hear the truth. Hell, people knew there were no WMD's in Iraq, they knew Bush wanted to invade Iraq before 9/11, and they STILL reelected him in '04.

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: Pabster
Isn't it interesting that many of the Paulbots are 9/11 Kooks as well?

And you guys wonder, as Prof mentioned, why you aren't taken seriously.

It's sad, because Paul suffers from your delusion and paranoia. (And I'm talking effects on his campaign, not that he himself is of that mindset)

I don't know if it's interesting, but it is telling.

Do you know that if you literally take the phrase "There's a sucker born every minute." and apply it to the average annual birthrate in the US over the last 4 decades it accounts for nearly every Ron Paul supporter in the US?

Are you trying to imply that all Paul's supporters are "suckers?"

 

[jpeyton]

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: Pabster
Isn't it interesting that many of the Paulbots are 9/11 Kooks as well?

And you guys wonder, as Prof mentioned, why you aren't taken seriously.

It's sad, because Paul suffers from your delusion and paranoia. (And I'm talking effects on his campaign, not that he himself is of that mindset)

I don't know if it's interesting, but it is telling.

Do you know that if you literally take the phrase "There's a sucker born every minute." and apply it to the average annual birthrate in the US over the last 4 decades it accounts for nearly every Ron Paul supporter in the US?

I'm curious why you two feel so threatened by Ron Paul that you try to discredit him in every thread you post in.

 

[ProfJohn]

Originally posted by: bamacre
I am not going to waste the time watching it. If for only one reason, that reason is that even IF there is significant evidence of a cover-up, then what? Then nothing. People still wouldn't want to hear the truth. Hell, people knew there were no WMD's in Iraq, they knew Bush wanted to invade Iraq before 9/11, and they STILL reelected him in '04.

Which people knew and when did they know it? And I would like to see proof of this claim.

I am sure you'll rush in with the proof just as you rushed in to provide proof that someone knew about 9-11 before it happened.

 

[halik]

go away and take your ron paul spam with you

 

[jpeyton]

Originally posted by: halik
go away and take your roon paul spam with you

This has nothing to do with Ron Paul.

 

[TastesLikeChicken]

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: Pabster
Isn't it interesting that many of the Paulbots are 9/11 Kooks as well?

And you guys wonder, as Prof mentioned, why you aren't taken seriously.

It's sad, because Paul suffers from your delusion and paranoia. (And I'm talking effects on his campaign, not that he himself is of that mindset)

I don't know if it's interesting, but it is telling.

Do you know that if you literally take the phrase "There's a sucker born every minute." and apply it to the average annual birthrate in the US over the last 4 decades it accounts for nearly every Ron Paul supporter in the US?

I'm curious why you two feel so threatened by Ron Paul that you try to discredit him in every thread you post in.

Every thread I post in? Overstate your case much?

In the first place rarely reply in a Ron Paul thread or mention him.

Second of all I'm not discrediting Ron Paul in my statement. I don't think Ron Paul is all that bad. I like what he has to say even if it does seem to a be a bit of naivity mixed with senility. Still, I can appreciate idealism and pie-in-the-sky sentiments like anyone else.

It's just that I generally find his consituents off of their rocker. Ron Paul doesn't turn me off. His supporters do.

 

[Sinsear]

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: halik
go away and take your roon paul spam with you

This has nothing to do with Ron Paul.

I don't know; the paulbots are here, busy lapping this shit up.

 

[NoStateofMind]

Originally posted by: Sinsear

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: halik
go away and take your roon paul spam with you

This has nothing to do with Ron Paul.

I don't know; the paulbots are here, busy lapping this shit up.

So are the government shills