8800GT Review(s) - (18 and counting)

HigherGround

Golden Member
Jan 9, 2000
1,827
0
0
Anand's Review
Expreview
Tweaktown (MSI NX8800GT) (thanks TroubleM)
Boot Daily
VR-Zone
TomsHardware (Leadtek WinFast PX8800GT)
EliteBastards (ASUS EN8800GT)
Hardocp
FiringSquad
Guru3D (SLI)
HotHardware (SLI)
TechReport
FPSLabs (SLI)
Motherboards.org
HardwareCanucks
LegitReviews
neoseeker
TechPowerup

Not only that, but we can expect the stock clocked 512MB 8800 GT to hit $200 at the low end. The 256MB part, which won't show up until the end of November, will hit prices below $200

~$200 for stock 512MB GT ... holy mother of God :shocked:
 

Rusin

Senior member
Jun 25, 2007
573
0
0
I made comparison from those scores. I used HD2900XT 1024MB and 800 GTS 640MB and 8800 GTX

Quake Wars: Enemy Territory
1920x1200 4xAA 16xAF

65FPS

82% GTX
124,5% HD2900XT
110% GTS
----
Half-Life 2: Episode 2
1920x1200 4xAA 16xAF
59 fps

90% GTX
123% HD2900XT
124% GTS
----

Stalker [Ultra quality]
1920x1200

76.58 fps

80,7% GTX
118% HD2900XT
108% GTS

-------

Colin McRae: Offroad
1280x1024 4xAA

41,4 fps

96% GTX
121,8% HD2900XT
130,7% GTS

-------

World In Conflict DX10
1600x1200

33fps

91,7% GTX
132% HD2900XT
117,8% GTS

-----

Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts DX10
1600x1200 4xAA

31,5 fps

69,5% GTX
111,7% HD2900XT
97,2% GTS

-------

Lost Planet DX10 4xAA 16xAF 1280x1024

Cave: 42.8 fps
84,2% GTX
167,2% HD2900XT
114,1% GTS

Snow: 30.3

80,7% GTX
160,3% HD2900XT
111,4% GTS

Bioshock DX10 Ultra quality 1920x1200
45 fps

92,7% GTX
100,2% HD2900XT
121,1% GTS
------
Note there were some performance difference between 320MB and 640MB..and 640MB performed better. These 8800 GT 512MB's are supposed to replace 8800 GTS 320MB (pricewise) not that old 640MB.

-----

Overclocking:
From 600/1800
to 730/2000

Don't know how good that is? I mean there's certain difference between in overclockability with early 8800 GTS 640MB and more recent (new revision is better overclocking).

--------

And it's no suprice it's monster card when it comes to h.264 and VC-1

-------------

What optimizations will HD3800-series cards have? This 8800 GT 512MB will be priced similarly compared to HD3850 which will be as good as HD2900XT (performance wise) without optimizations
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,211
50
91
Site must be getting hammered to Helsinki. I can't get it going.
Rusin: Do your percentages indicate the performance of the 8800GT to each card?
Example:
Quake Wars: Enemy Territory
1920x1200 4xAA 16xAF

65FPS

82% GTX
124,5% HD2900XT
110% GTS

This means that the 8800GT performs at 82% of a GTX, 124.5% of the 2900XT, and 110% of the GTS?. Correct?
Just wanted to clarify for others.

 

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,002
126
It's faster than the GTS but slower than the GTX, which is what I expected.
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,211
50
91
Quite a change from how things were last 3 gens, eh?

from 59xx-68xx-79xx, all 256-bit
Now, we have 3 different width's in the same gen.
8800GT 256-bit
8800GTS 320-bit
8800GTX 384-bit
 

Rusin

Senior member
Jun 25, 2007
573
0
0
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Site must be getting hammered to Helsinki. I can't get it going.
Rusin: Do your percentages indicate the performance of the 8800GT to each card?
Example:
Quake Wars: Enemy Territory
1920x1200 4xAA 16xAF

65FPS

82% GTX
124,5% HD2900XT
110% GTS

This means that the 8800GT performs at 82% of a GTX, 124.5% of the 2900XT, and 110% of the GTS?. Correct?
Just wanted to clarify for others.

Well it's like:
GT's fps / GTX's fps = 0,82
GT's fps / HD2900XT's fps = 1,245
GT's fps/ GTS's fps =1,1

So you can calculate back those HD2900XT and GTX and GTS results.

 

Rusin

Senior member
Jun 25, 2007
573
0
0
Geforce 8800 GT uses 20W less in load compared to GTS, 84W less compared to GTX. Card also runs rather hot on default (idle: 62, load 85)..don't know if that cooler is silent, but lower powerconsumption and G92 running hot could indicate that this one slot solution is silent. Overclocking: It's not in language that I could understand, but they got atleast 730 / 2000 for clocks (1825 for shaders). Their 3dMark06 result dir rise 13% from 12403 -> 14013.

Test system included:
QX6700@3.0GHz (9x333)
Asustek P5E3 Deluxe (X38)
Kingston DDR3-1066
Vista 32-bit

edit
Ok I can't connect to that site anymore.. too much traffic. When I first heard of that review I couldn't get in, but then for a very short period that review website worked like a dream :p.

Btw. Two 8800GT's with price of one 8800 GTX..anyone?
 

rmed64

Senior member
Feb 4, 2005
237
0
0
So glad I never buy those $500 video cards when months later you can get better cards at half the price.
 

fluxquantum

Platinum Member
Oct 27, 2000
2,398
1
71
Originally posted by: rmed64
So glad I never buy those $500 video cards when months later you can get better cards at half the price.

exactly. i'm glad i decided to hold off.
 

JAG87

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2006
3,921
3
76
Originally posted by: fluxquantum
Originally posted by: rmed64
So glad I never buy those $500 video cards when months later you can get better cards at half the price.

exactly. i'm glad i decided to hold off.


avoid making comments like that, everyone knows there is something better around the corner, but you cant just keep waiting, especially when the wait time is almost 1 year, which is a huge amount of time in technology.
 

nitromullet

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2004
9,031
36
91
Originally posted by: fluxquantum
Originally posted by: rmed64
So glad I never buy those $500 video cards when months later you can get better cards at half the price.

exactly. i'm glad i decided to hold off.

The 8800GTX has been out for almost a year now. It isn't that uncommon for a card with almost the same performance for half the cost to come out a year after a high end flagship card. That being said, it's nice to see NVIDIA moving forward and bringing high performance DX10 cards down to a more affordable level.

 

JAG87

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2006
3,921
3
76
Originally posted by: nitromullet
Originally posted by: fluxquantum
Originally posted by: rmed64
So glad I never buy those $500 video cards when months later you can get better cards at half the price.

exactly. i'm glad i decided to hold off.

The 8800GTX has been out for almost a year now. It isn't that uncommon for a card with almost the same performance for half the cost to come out a year after a high end flagship card. That being said, it's nice to see NVIDIA moving forward and bringing high performance DX10 cards down to a more affordable level.


thanks for paraphrasing me :D
 

1ManArmY

Golden Member
Mar 7, 2003
1,333
0
0
Originally posted by: JAG87
Originally posted by: nitromullet
Originally posted by: fluxquantum
Originally posted by: rmed64
So glad I never buy those $500 video cards when months later you can get better cards at half the price.

exactly. i'm glad i decided to hold off.

The 8800GTX has been out for almost a year now. It isn't that uncommon for a card with almost the same performance for half the cost to come out a year after a high end flagship card. That being said, it's nice to see NVIDIA moving forward and bringing high performance DX10 cards down to a more affordable level.


thanks for paraphrasing me :D

are these new 8800 GT's on the 65nm die DX 10.1 compliant cards? If not when are they expected?
 

Creig

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,170
13
81
Originally posted by: HigherGround
$249 ... holy mother of God :shocked:

Unless AMD magically pulls a rabbit out of their hat with the 3800 series, I think I know which card I'm going to ask Mrs Santa to get me for Christmas.
 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,756
600
126
Originally posted by: nitromullet
Originally posted by: fluxquantum
Originally posted by: rmed64
So glad I never buy those $500 video cards when months later you can get better cards at half the price.

exactly. i'm glad i decided to hold off.

The 8800GTX has been out for almost a year now. It isn't that uncommon for a card with almost the same performance for half the cost to come out a year after a high end flagship card. That being said, it's nice to see NVIDIA moving forward and bringing high performance DX10 cards down to a more affordable level.

Frankly, I would argue the opposite of their opinions...the 8800 series went totally unmatched for 6 months, and remained top contenders for an entire year. It seems before those cards came out, a better deal was always just around the corner. Sure, you now get a bit more performance for $100 less...but early adopters usually get totally screwed.

It looks like the market will finally see a much needed viable option in the low $200 price range.
 

Cabages

Platinum Member
Jan 1, 2006
2,918
0
0
Originally posted by: 1ManArmY
Originally posted by: JAG87
Originally posted by: nitromullet
Originally posted by: fluxquantum
Originally posted by: rmed64
So glad I never buy those $500 video cards when months later you can get better cards at half the price.

exactly. i'm glad i decided to hold off.

The 8800GTX has been out for almost a year now. It isn't that uncommon for a card with almost the same performance for half the cost to come out a year after a high end flagship card. That being said, it's nice to see NVIDIA moving forward and bringing high performance DX10 cards down to a more affordable level.


thanks for paraphrasing me :D

are these new 8800 GT's on the 65nm die DX 10.1 compliant cards? If not when are they expected?

From what I understand, they are DX10, not 10.1, and that the new AMD cards are.

Im not sure if that actually matters. Can you update to 10.1 through software, or is it only through hardware?

I found this, course it looks like you can find other articles that say its not compliant with dx10. So which is it?
 

Golgatha

Lifer
Jul 18, 2003
12,390
1,054
126
Originally posted by: rmed64
So glad I never buy those $500 video cards when over a year later you can get better cards at half the price.

8800GTX has been out for how long now?

Edit: Just looked it up. The 8800GTX was released 11/8/2006. I doubt the 8800GT will be out by 11/8/2007.
 

SniperDaws

Senior member
Aug 14, 2007
762
0
0
Originally posted by: Golgatha
Originally posted by: rmed64
So glad I never buy those $500 video cards when over a year later you can get better cards at half the price.

8800GTX has been out for how long now?

Edit: Just looked it up. The 8800GTX was released 11/8/2006. I doubt the 8800GT will be out by 11/8/2007.


Pffff so itll miss it by a few days whats your point ?

 

Ares202

Senior member
Jun 3, 2007
331
0
71
Originally posted by: Golgatha
Originally posted by: rmed64
So glad I never buy those $500 video cards when over a year later you can get better cards at half the price.

8800GTX has been out for how long now?

Edit: Just looked it up. The 8800GTX was released 11/8/2006. I doubt the 8800GT will be out by 11/8/2007.

mid range has moved alot in the last year, 7600gt was the mid range back in 2006 i think thats what he is trying to point out

 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
Originally posted by: JAG87
Originally posted by: fluxquantum
Originally posted by: rmed64
So glad I never buy those $500 video cards when months later you can get better cards at half the price.

exactly. i'm glad i decided to hold off.


avoid making comments like that, everyone knows there is something better around the corner, but you cant just keep waiting, especially when the wait time is almost 1 year, which is a huge amount of time in technology.

Yes, this is true. Some people needed a card right away and they had to choose. 1 year in technology time is too long to wait.
 

Wag

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
8,288
8
81
How much is the 512MB version of the card supposed to cost, and will they offer HDMI output/dongles like ATI currently does?