80/20 gone...

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Delta6Echo

Senior member
Jun 1, 2007
837
0
0
Originally posted by: V00DOO
Here is a breakdown of the amount of loans resetting through 2008 (source: JP Morgan). This is frightening. These numbers are approximate. It will be a hairy 2008! There is still an incredible amount of business out there even if only 25% of these can refinance.

March 07 = 6 billion $
April 07 = 7 billion $
May 07 = 9.8 billion $
June 07 = 10 billion $
July 07 = 12 billion $
Aug 07 = 17.5 billion $
Sept 07 = 18 billion $
Oct 07 = 20 billion $
Nov 07 = 23 billion $
Dec 07 = 22.5 billion $
Jan 08 = 25 billion $
Feb 08 = 25 billion $
March 08 = 23 billion $
April 08 = 22.5 billion $
May 08 = 24 billion $
June 08 = 18 billion $
July 08 = 20 billion $
Aug 08 = 25 billion $
Sept 08 = 23 billion $
Oct 08 = 23 billion $
Nov 08 = 23 billion $
Dec 08 = 20 billion $

Those are some crazy numbers. Link

Can you explain exactly what this means for the housing/financing market?
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
26,066
4,712
126
Originally posted by: Delta6Echo
Can you explain exactly what this means for the housing/financing market?
No one knows exactly what will happen. But there are some things that are likely to happen.

Notice that things soar soon and hit a plateau right around October. It doesn't get much worse after that, but it doesn't get better either. So by the end of the year we will know roughly what we will be dealing with.

1) Some of those people will be just fine. I'll be one of them. But my ARM resets a bit later than on that list. However, by the time my 5-year ARM resets, I'll have the house virtually all paid off. So the increase in interest won't be more than a blip on my budget.

2) Some of those people will struggle but be just fine. They will cut spending elsewhere to make up for spending more on interest. Expect retail stores to take a small but significant hit.

3) Some of those people will refinance. They'll take a bit of a hit, but hopefully they will get into a mortgage product that better suits them.

4) Some of those people will enter foreclosure. Their houses will be taken away and sold. This tends to have a depressing force on the local area housing prices. Look at Detriot for an extreme case. An empty house is an invitation for problems (local crime, unkept lawns, etc).

We will have a mixture of all of those effects. What effect dominates is yet to be seen.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: Vic


LK and I, in many ways, argue that the same things are likely to happen. Where we disagree is that I think that he selfishly and short-sightedly doesn't consider the full implications. Therefore, he acts like a bust is the best thing that could possibly happen for him personally, regardless of how it will effect others (i.e. no "weeping"), and imagines contradicting scenarios where he can profit from all this (for example, he said just a few days ago that the Fed wouldn't cut rates, yet now he argues that they will). In the meantime, I see the entire situation, boom to bust, as being a negative of irrational exhuberence and panic. To distract (in his usual asshattish fashion) from my argument in this regard, LK straw mans that I think home values are going to continue going up or that I want more borrowers who can't afford it to get financing blah blah blah.

Yeah, I am asshattish, yet again with the name calling. It's quite pathetic that you have nothing else. Keep coming. Perhaps you'll push me far enough I'll threaten to get you banned, just like you did to me.

I never said the Fed wouldn't cut rates without the caveat about inflation. If I excluded it you can look at any other of my posts on the subject and see that. Naturally, you won't, because you refuse to address points and would rather just attack away.
 

ultimatebob

Lifer
Jul 1, 2001
25,134
2,450
126
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Originally posted by: JEDI
what? why were 80/20's canceled?

it was a sweet loan as well.

no $ down, 80% 1st loan, 20% 2nd loan (at a little higher interest).

and you didnt even have to pay the 20%. (and my loan had no late penalties. :) )

Just pay the minimum on the 80% and the bank is happy. they're not going to foreclose if you miss the 20% part.

But are 80/20's gone by law, or because you dont have the credit rating?

They're going away because banks don't want to take the risk.

Or, they're sick of running into people like JEDI who don't pay off their second mortgage :)
 

ultimatebob

Lifer
Jul 1, 2001
25,134
2,450
126
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Originally posted by: waggy
personally i think part of it is they do listen to "experts". well at least the experts on business news and shows like "flip this house" and seeing everyone buying McMnsions.

they think well if he can buy a house for $300k and sale it for $500K 3 months later then it should be worth tons in 3 years before the ARM matures!

then they find out it does not work that way.

i think its a case of "just enough knowledge to be dangerous"

You should watch "Flip this house" again. The last time I watched the show they had three people straight fail to be able to sell the houses they intended to flip. One started living in it, one started renting, and I forget what the third was doing. From what I saw, only 1/3rd of the people who were doing it had any buisness trying to do it at all. The theme of "can't build, can't keep track of finances, can't work with contractors, and doesn't see this as a buisness decision" kept coming up. Many of the people on the show thought it was an easy $200k and ended up stuck holding $3k/mo mortgages and maxed credit cards with a house that wouldn't sell.

When I was looking for a fixer upper, the market for them was overblown because of people like that who wanted to make a quick buck rather than save some cash for themselves.

I think you're talking about "Flip That House." "Flip This House" is the one that follows real developers who flip houses. The first season followed a company in South Carolina. The second season had a company in Texas, a company in Atlanta, and possibly more (the second season sucked, so I stopped watching). The guy who runs the company in South Carolina (Richard Davis) has a new show now called The Real Deal.

Flip THAT House, from what I've seen, has people who have no idea what they're doing, no business flipping houses, and are just trying to make a quick buck with no work. All of the flippers I saw were in California, but that was a couple of years ago.

Flip THIS House was a great show for the first season
Flip THAT House made me want to punch babies.

Both Flip THIS House and Flip THAT House seemed to have semi-professional property renovators that always seemed to make good money on their houses. Of course, they always made it LOOK that way anyway! They would often end the show with some Realtor making an overblown appraisal of what the house MIGHT sell for after the renovation, rather than what it actually sold for.

Property Ladder always has dumb newbies with no experience doing home renovations, though. I liked that show the best, since those folks usually go WAY over schedule and over budget like most flippers do. They usually end up making practically no money on the deal when it takes months to sell their house far below their original asking price.

Property Ladder also factors in carrying costs and realtor's fees, which the other flipping shows seem to ignore.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Originally posted by: waggy
personally i think part of it is they do listen to "experts". well at least the experts on business news and shows like "flip this house" and seeing everyone buying McMnsions.

they think well if he can buy a house for $300k and sale it for $500K 3 months later then it should be worth tons in 3 years before the ARM matures!

then they find out it does not work that way.

i think its a case of "just enough knowledge to be dangerous"

You should watch "Flip this house" again. The last time I watched the show they had three people straight fail to be able to sell the houses they intended to flip. One started living in it, one started renting, and I forget what the third was doing. From what I saw, only 1/3rd of the people who were doing it had any buisness trying to do it at all. The theme of "can't build, can't keep track of finances, can't work with contractors, and doesn't see this as a buisness decision" kept coming up. Many of the people on the show thought it was an easy $200k and ended up stuck holding $3k/mo mortgages and maxed credit cards with a house that wouldn't sell.

When I was looking for a fixer upper, the market for them was overblown because of people like that who wanted to make a quick buck rather than save some cash for themselves.

I think you're talking about "Flip That House." "Flip This House" is the one that follows real developers who flip houses. The first season followed a company in South Carolina. The second season had a company in Texas, a company in Atlanta, and possibly more (the second season sucked, so I stopped watching). The guy who runs the company in South Carolina (Richard Davis) has a new show now called The Real Deal.

Flip THAT House, from what I've seen, has people who have no idea what they're doing, no business flipping houses, and are just trying to make a quick buck with no work. All of the flippers I saw were in California, but that was a couple of years ago.

Flip THIS House was a great show for the first season
Flip THAT House made me want to punch babies.

Both Flip THIS House and Flip THAT House seemed to have semi-professional property renovators that always seemed to make good money on their houses. Of course, they always made it LOOK that way. They would often end the show with some Realtor making an overblown appraisal of what the house MIGHT sell for after the renovation, rather than what it actually sold for.

Properly Ladder always has dumb newbies with no experience doing home renovations, though. I liked that show the best, since those folks usually go WAY over schedule and over budget like most flippers do. They usually end up making practically no money on the deal when it takes months to sell their house far below their original asking price.

Property Ladder also factors in carrying costs and realtor's fees, which the other shows seem to ignore.

some of the newer shows actually are showing what the house goes for.

so far most have been BELOW what they expected but they still make a profit.
 

sciencewhiz

Diamond Member
Jun 30, 2000
5,885
8
81
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
To add some figures to this:
A family spending $900/mo on rent (typical 2 bed apartment) with the ability to afford a mortgage with a $1500/mo payment. This is about equivilent to a $230k house (typical okayish entry level house) with a 20% down payment ($46,000)
If they saved up the $600/mo, they would save up $7200/year. It would take a bit over six years to save up the 20% down payment at that rate. During which time, they will be having zero equity.

They might not have equity in a house, but they would have cash with a value greater then the equity they would have in a house that was 100% financed. If the money was invested, the difference could be even greater.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81

Originally posted by: dullardYes, I agree completely. But the caps/margins are buried in long documents amongst hundreds of other numbers and confusing paragraphs. Interest rates are based on indicies that people signing the paper don't understand. Etc.

That is why I want a simple table on page 1. The table (and hopefully the broker) will say that they have no idea what will happen in the future. But the table lists the possibilites. What is so hard about that? If interest rates plunge, your mortgage payment will probably go down. Put what it is now and what will happen to your mortgage payment if it goes down. If interest rates soar, your interest will soar, put what will happen to your mortgage payment if it does soar.

Adding more and more to the paperwork is not going to be the answer to stupidity. If someone doesn't know WTF they are signing or even bother to read it then it's on them.

Personally I am tried of the govern't bailing out all the idiots. I say let them suffer in their mistakes. Especially those thinking they'd get rich quick buying up junk and covering up problems with the places.

Originally posted by: dullard
At least then people will know the maximum and minimum they'll be paying for interest during the life of the loan, if the loan proceeds on schedule. I see story after story of people who DIDN'T understand that they might be paying hundreds of dollars more per month if interest rates go up. Yes, it was disclosed according to regulations. But no one highlighted that to the borrowers and certainly no one did the math to show what will happen to their mortgage payments.

If a borrower can afford $1500/month and sees that the mortgage payment will be $1400-$1850/month depending on how interest rates move, that should give them a signal that things may be quite bad. Instead, they see in the documents that they start out at $1500 and think everything will be ok. Sure, they'll be fine if rates go down, but not if rates go up. The POSSIBLE monthly payments just aren't currently shown to them right up on front in a big bold table.

You will still have those that bank on things going down. Only poor brokers would not disclose the risks. Even with those disclosure changes, it would make it easier for those brokers to basically lie.

Originally posted by: dullard
It is beyond the expectations for a bank to guess what will happen to politics. Hopefully, the buyers will be told that taxes can go up, but how much is anybody's guess. This can't be quantified. But the payments when the mortgage enters the adjustable period CAN be quantified very clearly. Lets say the current mortgage ARM rate is 6.5%, the margin is 2%, cap is +-2% per year, and the index is sitting at 8%, you can print what will happen if it went adjustable that day.

again though people are going to assume best case instead of worst case.

Originally posted by: dullard
And yet the public is expected to know what will happen to their mortgage payments under various conditions without it printed for them. And half of them probably can't tell you what 5% of $1000 is.

Right...so we now police the stupid? Hire an attorney to handle one's transaction. Just like everything else in life, being stupid should cost one more. However; what is happening now is the non-stupid are supposed to foot the bill.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: dullard
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Right...so we now police the stupid?
Why are you fighting so hard against putting two numbers on a form?

It's more than two numbers.

Lets assume we plot the full possibility of an ARM with just the worst case adjustments each year.

You now have a table that is about as likely to happen as the rates always going down.

Those same customers are now going to assume they are looking at no where near those payments, when very well they could be...even if for a few years.

Along with this there is also a call for counselling, more descriptions in the paperwork, etc.

The solution is to require an attorney...if one elects not to retain one then anything they 'misread' is on them.

The funny part of it all is the disclosures are pretty complete as it is, if one would read them.

Also if anyone can't figure out what a percentage of a figure means when there is no restriction that they cannot use a calculator, there is no help for that person. They should have someone else handle their money.

What's going on in the market right now was that people were playing liar's poker to get in, now they are playing liar's liar's poker to get out...claiming they had no idea.

We still get loan requests from people asking 'can you please tell me what income I need to input on the application to go stated on a $xxx,xxx property?'

We also get a ton of people saying since X company offers a conventional loan at X% (20% down, 1 origination and 2 discount points) that we should be able to beat that at 0% down...no points.
 

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: dullard
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Right...so we now police the stupid?
Why are you fighting so hard against putting two numbers on a form?

It's more than two numbers.

Lets assume we plot the full possibility of an ARM with just the worst case adjustments each year.

You now have a table that is about as likely to happen as the rates always going down.

Those same customers are now going to assume they are looking at no where near those payments, when very well they could be...even if for a few years.

Along with this there is also a call for counselling, more descriptions in the paperwork, etc.

The solution is to require an attorney...if one elects not to retain one then anything they 'misread' is on them.

The funny part of it all is the disclosures are pretty complete as it is, if one would read them.

Also if anyone can't figure out what a percentage of a figure means when there is no restriction that they cannot use a calculator, there is no help for that person. They should have someone else handle their money.

What's going on in the market right now was that people were playing liar's poker to get in, now they are playing liar's liar's poker to get out...claiming they had no idea.

We still get loan requests from people asking 'can you please tell me what income I need to input on the application to go stated on a $xxx,xxx property?'

We also get a ton of people saying since X company offers a conventional loan at X% (20% down, 1 origination and 2 discount points) that we should be able to beat that at 0% down...no points.

I'm not sure how anyone can walk out of a closing not knowing exactly what all the terms are. Since we purchased our first house in 1989 everytime we go in to settlement for a refinance or when we purchased a new home in 1996 the paper work we have to sign increases and 99% of it is government mandated disclosures about various pieces of the transaction including at least 3 or 4 different ones regarding the interest rate and total cost of the credit being extended.
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
26,066
4,712
126
Originally posted by: alkemyst
It's more than two numbers.

Lets assume we plot the full possibility of an ARM with just the worst case adjustments each year.

You now have a table that is about as likely to happen as the rates always going down.
I think you are way, way, way overexaggerating what I said I wanted. You must be talking about someone else, somewhere else. So either please link us to who you are responding to, or comment on my thoughts.

Let me reiterate my thoughts.
[*]Suppose a buyer is interested in getting a 3-year ARM.
[*]Suppose the ARM is fixed at 6% for the first 3 years.
[*]Suppose the mortgage is for $200k.
[*]The monthly payment will be $1199.10 for the first three years (plus escrot).
[*]That is all included in the disclosure, and that is all good.
[*]Suppose the ARM is indexed to the 1-year LIBOR average (5.245% currently).
[*]Suppose the ARM is set to be 2% above that LIBOR average.
[*]Suppose the cap is 2% movement in interest rates per year.

Thus, after 3 years assuming the buyers paid everything on time, there are several possibilities:
1) The LIBOR average stayed the same. In this case, even though the LIBOR didn't change, the interest rate becomes 7.245%. Monthly payments become $1352.93. This is something that most people don't know. Even though the LIBOR was unchanged, their payments go up over $150/month.
2) The LIBOR average could fall. In the most extreme case, the ARM interest rate becomes $970.38 at the reset.
3) The LIBOR average could rise. In the most extreme case, the ARM interest rate becomes 8% at the reset. The monthly payment becomes $1450.01.

So the table would look like this:
Current: 6%, monthly payment $1199.10
3 years if LIBOR is constant: 7.245%, $1352.93
3 years if LIBOR falls: 4% to 7.245%, $970.38 to $1352.93
3 years if LIBOR rises: 7.245% to 8%, $1352.93 to $1450.01.
That is it, nothing more is reasonable to put on there because it includes far too many assumptions. That would be an impossible forecasting result. But the buyers will see front and center that in most cases, their payments are going to go up. Even if the LIBOR stays the same. That latter point is lost on almost all buyers.

This isn't a call for counselling, it isn't really much more paperwork, it isn't an attorney with massive extra costs attorneys bring. You are right, someone else should handle the paperwork and explain it to the buyers, and that person ideally would be the broker. But people leave the broker not understanding what really will happen to their payments.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: dullard
Originally posted by: alkemyst
It's more than two numbers.

Lets assume we plot the full possibility of an ARM with just the worst case adjustments each year.

You now have a table that is about as likely to happen as the rates always going down.
I think you are way, way, way overexaggerating what I said I wanted. You must be talking about someone else, somewhere else. So either please link us to who you are responding to, or comment on my thoughts.

Let me reiterate my thoughts.
[*]Suppose a buyer is interested in getting a 3-year ARM.
[*]Suppose the ARM is fixed at 6% for the first 3 years.
[*]Suppose the mortgage is for $200k.
[*]The monthly payment will be $1199.10 for the first three years (plus escrot).
[*]That is all included in the disclosure, and that is all good.
[*]Suppose the ARM is indexed to the 1-year LIBOR average (5.245% currently).
[*]Suppose the ARM is set to be 2% above that LIBOR average.
[*]Suppose the cap is 2% movement in interest rates per year.

Thus, after 3 years assuming the buyers paid everything on time, there are several possibilities:
1) The LIBOR average stayed the same. In this case, even though the LIBOR didn't change, the interest rate becomes 7.245%. Monthly payments become $1352.93. This is something that most people don't know. Even though the LIBOR was unchanged, their payments go up over $150/month.
2) The LIBOR average could fall. In the most extreme case, the ARM interest rate becomes $970.38 at the reset.
3) The LIBOR average could rise. In the most extreme case, the ARM interest rate becomes 8% at the reset. The monthly payment becomes $1450.01.

So the table would look like this:
Current: 6%, monthly payment $1199.10
3 years if LIBOR is constant: 7.245%, $1352.93
3 years if LIBOR falls: 4% to 7.245%, $970.38 to $1352.93
3 years if LIBOR rises: 7.245% to 8%, $1352.93 to $1450.01.
That is it, nothing more is reasonable to put on there because it includes far too many assumptions. That would be an impossible forecasting result. But the buyers will see front and center that in most cases, their payments are going to go up. Even if the LIBOR stays the same. That latter point is lost on almost all buyers.

This isn't a call for counselling, it isn't really much more paperwork, it isn't an attorney with massive extra costs attorneys bring. You are right, someone else should handle the paperwork and explain it to the buyers, and that person ideally would be the broker. But people leave the broker not understanding what really will happen to their payments.

First your quote is "Why are you fighting so hard against putting two numbers on a form?"

What you have explained above is more than just two numbers. Also that situation is a very simple one.

If someone doesn't understand that fixed for the first three years means after that it will change. I don't think there is nothing else you could explain to them to help them understand that.

Also like I have said no matter what you tell these types of borrowers they are going to look at the house always going up and their rate always going down.


 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Linflas
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: dullard
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Right...so we now police the stupid?
Why are you fighting so hard against putting two numbers on a form?

It's more than two numbers.

Lets assume we plot the full possibility of an ARM with just the worst case adjustments each year.

You now have a table that is about as likely to happen as the rates always going down.

Those same customers are now going to assume they are looking at no where near those payments, when very well they could be...even if for a few years.

Along with this there is also a call for counselling, more descriptions in the paperwork, etc.

The solution is to require an attorney...if one elects not to retain one then anything they 'misread' is on them.

The funny part of it all is the disclosures are pretty complete as it is, if one would read them.

Also if anyone can't figure out what a percentage of a figure means when there is no restriction that they cannot use a calculator, there is no help for that person. They should have someone else handle their money.

What's going on in the market right now was that people were playing liar's poker to get in, now they are playing liar's liar's poker to get out...claiming they had no idea.

We still get loan requests from people asking 'can you please tell me what income I need to input on the application to go stated on a $xxx,xxx property?'

We also get a ton of people saying since X company offers a conventional loan at X% (20% down, 1 origination and 2 discount points) that we should be able to beat that at 0% down...no points.

I'm not sure how anyone can walk out of a closing not knowing exactly what all the terms are. Since we purchased our first house in 1989 everytime we go in to settlement for a refinance or when we purchased a new home in 1996 the paper work we have to sign increases and 99% of it is government mandated disclosures about various pieces of the transaction including at least 3 or 4 different ones regarding the interest rate and total cost of the credit being extended.

See, this is my thinking exactly. You have to sign your name at least 100 times and the documents outline the terms of the transaction precisely and in clear and simple English that anyone with even a basic high school education should be able to understand.
And if the loan is an ARM or if it has differing amortization terms (like interest-only, balloon, or neg-am), then there is an additional package of disclosures to be signed fully outlining all the details along with required instructional/educational material.
If the loan is a purchase, then the borrower has the legal right to be able to review all of the documents 24 hours prior to closing.
And then if the loan is a refinance, the borrower is given 3 full business days after closing with which to review the documents and the option to cancel -- at absolutely zero cost to them, even previously paid deposits have to be refunded -- should they choose to.

And all that after 4-6 weeks of consultations and process and documentation and disclosures and estimates and required educational booklets, and FFS sometimes I think whole forests are cut down for a single transaction.

And STILL some people say they don't understand. I just don't get it. Understandably, some brokers are sh!theads and not in full compliance, but there's no escaping the volume of paperwork at closing.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: Vic
And STILL some people say they don't understand. I just don't get it. Understandably, some brokers are sh!theads and not in full compliance, but there's no escaping the volume of paperwork at closing.

most people I have asked did not read any of the paperwork save making sure their rate was correct.

If a broker is acting maliciously, no matter what extra paperwork is involved...there is no way to fix that situation except for those that read.

People spend more time going over used car paperwork than the papers they sign on a values several multiples of that in time and money.
 

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81
Originally posted by: alkemyst
most people I have asked did not read any of the paperwork save making sure their rate was correct.

If a broker is acting maliciously, no matter what extra paperwork is involved...there is no way to fix that situation except for those that read.

People spend more time going over used car paperwork than the papers they sign on a values several multiples of that in time and money.

That's particularly sad given that if they didn't require signatures in more than one place most people would spend as much time on the paperwork there as they do buying a TV at Walmart.
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
26,066
4,712
126
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Current: 6%, monthly payment $1199.10
3 years if LIBOR is constant: 7.245%, $1352.93
3 years if LIBOR falls: 4% to 7.245%, $970.38 to $1352.93
3 years if LIBOR rises: 7.245% to 8%, $1352.93 to $1450.01.
First your quote is "Why are you fighting so hard against putting two numbers on a form?"

What you have explained above is more than just two numbers. Also that situation is a very simple one.
Oh, no you caught me. 3 extra numbers, not 2. My bad, and I am sorry.

$1199.10 is already on there. Add $970.38, $1352.93, and $1450.01. Yes, it is simple to do. So why won't you do it for your customers?
If someone doesn't understand that fixed for the first three years means after that it will change. I don't think there is nothing else you could explain to them to help them understand that.
They understand that it is fixed then it will change. They DON'T understand how much it may change. Yes, it is described to them in words using complex definitions and indicies that they know nothing about. But in addition, just give them the range that it will change on the first change. Then they can understand what type of benefits and risk they are looking at.
Also like I have said no matter what you tell these types of borrowers they are going to look at the house always going up and their rate always going down.
You've got to be kidding. All customers, all the time? Your customers maybe. But a good broker won't have that happen. There are customers who will look at both extremes. There are customers who are conservative in their finances and will take the worst case scenerio. There are customers who only need the math done for them and who aren't idiots. To assume they will all assume interest rates will only go down is so short sighted, and so rediculous, that I wouldn't recommend anyone go to you.
 

Onita

Golden Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,158
0
71
Originally posted by: slsmnaz
Originally posted by: mugs

I think you're talking about "Flip That House." "Flip This House" is the one that follows real developers who flip houses. The first season followed a company in South Carolina. The second season had a company in Texas, a company in Atlanta, and possibly more (the second season sucked, so I stopped watching). The guy who runs the company in South Carolina (Richard Davis) has a new show now called The Real Deal.

Flip THAT House, from what I've seen, has people who have no idea what they're doing, no business flipping houses, and are just trying to make a quick buck with no work. All of the flippers I saw were in California, but that was a couple of years ago.

Flip THIS House was a great show for the first season
Flip THAT House made me want to punch babies.

Trademark Properties was his company. I watched the 1st season too and was disappointed they went to the people in TX. I think his show made people think it was very easy to do.

Flip This House actually is the fake on ;). It's been proven that the "flippers" on Flip This House, outside of Trademark Properties, did not do all the rehab they claimed to do, didn't actually sell some of the houses... hell, the Atlanta Company didn't have RE licenses and hired actors to "buy" the house.

Trademark Properties has a pending lawsuit against A&E, and now have their own show on.... whatever channel Flip That House is on.