Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: elmro
Thank the predatory practices of brokers selling in the sub prime market. Let's see, I will shove an 5+1 arm loan down the throat of someone with a 500 fico score and expect everything to be ok. When you do this on the scale of 10 million people - 80/20's go away.
It's a LOT more complicated than that..
First... That's not exactly how it was. Yes, there were some sleazy lenders out there that conned people into the wrong product. But the vast majority of the problem you see now came from the
buyers begging for any way to get into "that" house. "Come on, there HAS to be a way to make it work!" And generally speaking, there always was. What's the mortgage guy supposed to do? If he doesn't write the loan the next guy will.
To understand this melt down you have to know what the sub prime lending market is.
You've all heard of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. What do they do? Basically they buy loans from banks. This gives the banks more money to loan. If Freddie or Fannie weren't there, the banks would loan all the money they have and that would be it. (Can't loan wht you don't have right?) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac create liquidity in the market by buying up loans and freeing up lender resources so the lenders can loan more money.
NOW... Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae will not just buy any loan... in order for those entities to buy the loan, it has to meet certain criteria. Loans that meet these criteria are called Conforming loans. A conforming loan requires full documentation (W2's, bank statements, job verification with proof of time on job, minimum FICO, etc) and has strict income requirements and DTI ratios. Basically what everyone views as your standard mortgage.
Sub prime loans aren't bought up by Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae. They are called non-conforming. The guys loaning this money usually hold the loan themselves. Or they might find someone to sell it to on the secondary loan market.... Who knows. But generally speaking a lot of them were holding their own paper. Since they were loaning their own money and they were going to own the note, they could make the rules. (Its their money, thier risk right?) They were charging more for the loans and they charged a higher rate since they were taking on more risk. But because they were making the rules and assuming the risk themselves they could make any crazy loan product they wanted. And as long as their default rate didn't cross a certain line, they were fine. In fact, since the housing market was going up like a bottle rocket (thanks in large part to the sub prime funny money) in most of the country and people were buying and flipping or buying and selling after a short amount of time, nobody was defaulting and they were doing quite well.
But what goes up.... doesn't necessarily have to come down but can't keep going up at the rate it was forever. So when things leveled off, a lot of people (investors mostly at first) got caught. Boom. A wave of default. This started a chain of events where they had to tighten up the rules a bit... which shrunk the pool of buyers... which caused home values to slide a bit... which caught more people... which caused more defaults... which caused the rules to tighten more... which shrunk the pool of buyers... etc etc etc... and the process just accelerated until we got here.
NOW... to the OP's dillema. You have to understand that these 80/20 (or in some instances just plain 100%) loans were non-conforming (sub prime) loans. Where these lenders were happy to write you a loan that you had no financial stake in a year ago, today they want to see some money in the deal. Basically they mismanaged their own industry and have now reduced their product lines.
There's lots of blame to go around here. You can't put it all on the mortgage guy.