T_Yamamoto
Lifer
- Jul 6, 2011
- 15,007
- 795
- 126
not being able to find any decent reviews for the CX series
How about this:
ASUS P8P67 b3 1 085 kr
i5 2500K 1 790 kr
Corsair XMS3 8GB DDR3 1333 mhz 379 kr
FSP Aurum Gold 500W 749 kr
Scythe Ninja 3 435 kr
Total: 4 438 kr
This should be an improved setup, compared to your suggestion mfenn, for just a 230 kr increase in price, am I right?
If I go the 4 GB route - Corsair XMS3 4GB DDR3 1600 mhz, the total drops to 4 298 kr.
Any thoughts? I'm particularly interested to know your input on the P8P67 B3 in terms of overclocking.
EDIT: Oh, that Aurum PSU doesn't seem to be available in any of their shops (online or otherwise) atm. Maybe this could work: Antec High Current Gamer 520W 599 kr
That would bring my total to 4 148 kr while still being able to overclock if I feel the need for it.
Ok, good to know about the memory thingy. I think I'll get 8 GB.
The CX500 and CX600 seem to be seriously short on reviews, whereas several CX430 reviews can be found.
Jonnyguru CX430 9/10 recommended
Jonnyguru CX430 V2 9/10 recommended
Hardwaresecrets CX430 silver award (would have been golden award if not for slightly lower efficiency than expected)
Hardwaresecrets CX430 V2 golden award
Techpowerup CX430 V2 8.8 recommended
I'd get the XMS3 instead of the Vengeance. Otherwise you may run into clearance issues with the Ninja.
Why FSP?
ASUS P8P67 b3 1 085 kr
i5 2500K 1 790 kr
Corsair XMS3 8GB DDR3 1333 mhz 379 kr
FSP Aurum Gold 500W 749 kr
Scythe Ninja 3 435 kr
I ordered this today. The HCG 520W is out of stock and won't come back for some reason so I switched back to the Aurum Gold. Can't hurt to have a gold-rated PSU anyway!
The one thing I'm slightly worried about is if I will have enough power to overclock and maybe add an SSD down the road. What do you say?
I can still change the order before I go pick it up at the store.
Looks good to me. The FSP Aurum is a good PSU, there's no reason to pay for "name" PSUs if you know what to look for.
Just in that other thread you were recommending not to pay extra for a "fancy 80+ gold" PSU. That's what's happening here - Corsair TX650 is cheaper and can has higher output.
Corsair TX650 is cheaper and can has higher output.
Ok then, since all the experts agree I guess I'm going with the TX650. By the way, that was the PSU I was going for originally...
Since I'm eager to learn - why NOT pay extra for a gold-rated PSU?
Actually, it is worth it if the total price of the PC is 1-3% more. I.e. for a setup (consisting of the core components) worth $500, paying $5-10 more for 1600MHz RAM isn't a bad decision.
I don't know why I haven't realized this before. I've been telling people "nahh you'll be fine with 1333MHz RAM, you won't notice the difference". But if the price difference is equally unnoticeable on the whole, what's the problem with going for 1600Mhz? In reality, the speed increase that faster RAM gives you should be compared to the price increase of the total system consisting of the core components, not to the price of the RAM itself.
Based on this argument, even 1866MHz RAM could be worth it, if the rest of the core components are expensive enough. After all, it does increase overall system performance slightly. Pay $300 for a 2600K, $70 for a top air cooler, over $200 for a high-end Z68 board, $200 for an SSD, and it's totally worth it.
EDIT: looking at anandtech's memory scaling tests once more, 1866MHz memory just cannot be justified no matter what. The price is too high. But 1600MHz memory can be justified, price difference to 1333MHz is often small enough to justify that extra 2%.
I get what your saying but if you use your PC primarily for gaming and don't do compression and video encoding then there really is really no benefit going above 1333MHz IMO, also is there a time when you should ever recommend a board over $200? even if he has a big budget it's still money down the drain.