Can cancer be aided at a crossing point? Can dehydration? Perhaps the lesson is, taking children into custody shouldn't be your first response.
Once again, if you have someone in custody, you have responsibility for that person if they die. Regardless of how they died whether by cancer, dehydration, lightening or, boredom from your obtuse posts.Yes, you can aid someone dealing with cancer at a crossing point. Yes, you can aid someone suffering from dehydration at a crossing point.
If someone is trying to cross the border and is at risk of death by dehydration because of that attempt, then taking the person/children into custody is not only right, but, its the least immoral thing you can do. Are you saying that children suffering from dehydration be left to continue their attempt?
Once again, if you have someone in custody, you have responsibility for that person if they die. Regardless of how they died whether by cancer, dehydration, lightening or, boredom from your obtuse posts.
I've already said clearly and multiple times throughout this thread. I am not responsible for your inability to comprehend however, if I had you in custody and you "fell down" multiple times while I was explaining it to you, I would indeed have responsibility.Why would you be responsible for a person that has cancer and dies? What is the moral argument? What is the logical argument?
Also, having responsibility and being responsible for are different. They were responsible for a level of support while in custody. They are not responsible for everything that happens, even though they are responsible for a level of care. Your absurd position that they are responsible for anything and or everything is stupid. It would take any reasonable person 2 seconds to realize that a hard line position like that has huge flaws.
So, do you honestly believe they are responsible for anything and everything that happens to someone in custody?
I've already said clearly and multiple times throughout this thread. I am not responsible for your inability to comprehend however, if I had you in custody and you "fell down" multiple times while I was explaining it to you, I would indeed have responsibility.
Why would you be responsible for a person that has cancer and dies? What is the moral argument? What is the logical argument?
wtf are you talking about? Cancer? She didnt die of cancer. Your whataboutism is fucking retarded and so are you.
You are no longer worth my time.If you had custody for me, and I died from a heart attack because of obesity, you would not be responsible for the heart attack. If you did not call 911 to try and aid me, you would be responsible for not providing a base line level of care while I was in your custody.
Do you not understand that?
You are no longer worth my time.
I see, they were caught trying to enter the country illegally, maybe they should not be attempting this?. Mind you, I'm not a Trump-tard, his rallying cry's of "viscous gang members!, drug mules!, ect" is completely bogus and just an excuse to try to get his wall funded. That being said, it's unfair for border patrol to be blamed for this death, anyone with an ounce of common sense would realize this is a very dangerous undertaking for an adult much less a 7yr old.Perhaps, taking children into custody shouldn't be your first response.
They could be turned around right at the border without detaining them or taking them into custody.I see, they were caught trying to enter the country illegally, maybe they should not be attempting this?. Mind you, I'm not a Trump-tard, his rallying cry's of "viscous gang members!, drug mules!, ect" is completely bogus and just an excuse to try to get his wall funded. That being said, it's unfair for border patrol to be blamed for this death, anyone with an ounce of common sense would realize this is a very dangerous undertaking for an adult much less a 7yr old.
They could be turned around right at the border without detaining them or taking them into custody.
I'm talking about the hard line stance he has taken where they are responsible for anything and everything that happens while in their custody.
Evewn though it does not make it right that they entered the country illegally! Once they are caught then the border patrol is responsible to see that they have water and other things if needed......I see, they were caught trying to enter the country illegally, maybe they should not be attempting this?. Mind you, I'm not a Trump-tard, his rallying cry's of "viscous gang members!, drug mules!, ect" is completely bogus and just an excuse to try to get his wall funded. That being said, it's unfair for border patrol to be blamed for this death, anyone with an ounce of common sense would realize this is a very dangerous undertaking for an adult much less a 7yr old.
Evewn though it does not make it right that they entered the country illegally! Once they are caught then the border patrol is responsible to see that they have water and other things if needed......
This argument does not center around whether they should have entered the country or not!
Also American`s who have left water and supplies for these people have been convicted of helping these people!
Just by leaving water -- what an amazing concept!! NOT!!
You really have issues with comprehension don`t you?? But to entertain you -- at some point somebody is responsible for the medical needs of these people. I would say -- probably not right away! But if you detain them long enough...…..but what if they have the gonasyphaherpaids?
If anyone was wondering how to create terrorists. This is how you create terrorists.
If that was me on that border and that was my child. Holy crap batman, the lid would come off and I dont think i'd ever come back...
They could be turned around right at the border without detaining them or taking them into custody.
Evewn though it does not make it right that they entered the country illegally! Once they are caught then the border patrol is responsible to see that they have water and other things if needed......
This argument does not center around whether they should have entered the country or not!
Also American`s who have left water and supplies for these people have been convicted of helping these people!
Just by leaving water -- what an amazing concept!! NOT!!
You really have issues with comprehension don`t you?? But to entertain you -- at some point somebody is responsible for the medical needs of these people. I would say -- probably not right away! But if you detain them long enough...…..