IntelUser2000
Elite Member
- Oct 14, 2003
- 8,686
- 3,787
- 136
That's because Intel's SpecCPU scores get a ~20% boost from being compiled with ICC, remember?
So you are basically saying that their results are completely discredited while other guys like ARM is showing proper results? In the case of AMD, where they were rumored to have been purposely crippling(and ICC was the only viable compiler) that makes sense, but when comparing two totally different architectures, comparing top to top makes sense. Also, just because they look similar in architectures at the high level, do not mean they are in actual implementation.
I do believe 2x+ advantage in single threaded IPC difference holds in real world as well.
It helps that the processors actually do properly throttle.
Not just that. Core 2 clock gates far better than Pentium 4, so you wouldn't have unnecessary units executing. TDP would be different for processors that can't turn off FPU when its only ALU being used versus one that can do it properly for example. Or you'd have units throttling when elsewhere is bottlenecked, with minimal to no performance degradation.
Plain videos or more obnoxious flash stuff? That was really just one example.
Modern processors with sophisticated power management don't go anywhere near TDP with flash, you should know that simply by looking at reviews. And like I said, while it might reach "TDP" for a second or so, from a cooling perspective it might be a lot lower.
If that's the case why even bother with a relatively expensive ULV Core series derived processor in them?
I don't think this is really relevant.