Originally posted by: M0RPH
Originally posted by: sisq0kidd
Here's where I have a problem with your argument though. I have tested 1gb. You have not tested 2gb. Even with your testimony, you say you left textures at medium settings. That's where the hogging starts. Crank that up to high and tell me your 1gb can handle the load.
He plays at 1280x1024 res in BF2 on max settings. I answered his question straight about what would yield the best results. You are merely side stepping and saying the obvious that a better video card is a better video card. Maybe next time you can answer the OP's question instead of arguing something you have no clue about.
$70 to upgrade ram is the price you pay to upgrade from a 6600gt to x800. Which ever is the smartest move in real life is up to the user. However, to answer the OP's question again, 2 gigs would yield better results.
From all the things mentioned above, I can only see the things I have stated as obective. Twist my words and arguments all you like, but everything above still stands.
Here's the thing, though. With a 6600GT he's not gonna be able to play at 1280x1024 with everything maxed out. Not unless he likes to play at 10FPS. He will be playing at about the same settings that I play at, since his system will be about on par with mine. People here are saying that it's at 1280x1024 and up, with all maxed settings where you really start feeling the need for 2GB. I guess I can accept that, but it doesn't really apply to the guy who started this thread. It only applies to people with high end video cards that can actually run with those settings.
As for the comparison between 6600GT and X800, I've seen deals on both of these recently for about $130, so there isn't much of a price difference. That's why I recommended he get the X800 because in my book it's the better card.