Info 64MB V-Cache on 5XXX Zen3 Average +15% in Games

Page 125 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Kedas

Senior member
Dec 6, 2018
355
339
136
Well we know now how they will bridge the long wait to Zen4 on AM5 Q4 2022.
Production start for V-cache is end this year so too early for Zen4 so this is certainly coming to AM4.
+15% Lisa said is "like an entire architectural generation"
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and Gideon

jamescox

Senior member
Nov 11, 2009
644
1,105
136
That seems more of an issue with this the first iteration of v-cache CPUs than a fundamental issue with the technology.

I'm also not sure that water cooling is a viable solution if this is supposed to be able to expand beyond a niche product for gamers that want nothing short of the best. But if there aren't enough other niches for v-cache anyway then it hardly matters because only the crowd that wants to use a water block in their CPU/GPU already would buy one.
Isn’t the overclocking limitation not due to thermals? It seemed to mostly be a voltage limitation on the cache die. That would make sense since it was mostly designed for Epyc with lower clock / lower per core power consumption. It Is a massive performance boost for some applications in the server / HPC market, so it is likely in high demand there.

Most of the discussion here is kind of irrelevant because the cpu is not really that relevant to a lot of gaming. For most gaming, any of the CPUs in the benchmarks will achieve a very high frame rate. If the lowest processor on the list already hits more than 100 fps, then is it worth getting the more expensive part? Most real gaming scenarios are gpu limited anyway. There are a few cases where it makes a big difference, so if those are your thing, then it is a great cpu. “Fastest Gaming Processor” is a marketing thing, so I understand a little of the sentiment, but that doesn’t mean that it isn’t a good product. If you think of it as just a faster XT-like part, then what is the problem?

There mostly isn’t going to be any choice between getting a 5800X3D and an intel part rendering much of the discussion here moot. If you already have an AM4 board with DDR4, would you really consider switching to Intel; price of 5800X3D vs. new (and expensive) motherboard, DDR5, and CPU (really expensive if you go with the top intel overclocked marketing part)? Not likely. Most people who buy this are going to be getting it to upgrade an older system. Reviewers should focus on whether it is worth the price for a 3000 or 5000 series owner vs. cheaper parts, like a 5700X.

The v-cache part is the same thickness as a regular part and the thermal interface between the pieces off silicon is probably very good since the pieces are polished down to exceptional flatness. I am wondering about cooling if or when we see the 4 (or more) high stacks of v-cache. Four high may still be coming for Milan-x at some point. If they want to make stacks of more demanding chips, like multiple layers of CPUs, then that is where the extreme cooling is needed. I was wondering about some of the images posted earlier that showed extremely thick die. Those are most likely just a rendering, but the Zen 4 package is strangely thick. I have wondered if they might integrate some extreme cooling into some chips. Something like an integrated vapor chamber ash the “lid” or some other extreme cooling.


Edit: this is one of the things I was thinking of. Integrate TEC (thermo-electric cooler or peltier).

 
Last edited:

Panino Manino

Golden Member
Jan 28, 2017
1,141
1,379
136
Jayz2cents is similarly pi**ed. I won't even give him the benefit of linking to his whingy video about AM5, which is full of baseless speculation at best, and flat out lies for the rest. The video came out within a day of the X3D reviews, none of which are on Jayz channel.

I don't like Jay and don't understand how he has the public he has. All videos I watched of him was about him messing up, making excuses for messing up, failing, talking too much and saying nothing of worth.
Seriously, why?
But that aside, apparently AMD tried to buy 4 months of exclusivity from him? How can AMD be so stupid (in so many ways)?
 

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
8,479
7,712
136
Isn’t the overclocking limitation not due to thermals? It seemed to mostly be a voltage limitation on the cache die. That would make sense since it was mostly designed for Epyc with lower clock / lower per core power consumption. It Is a massive performance boost for some applications in the server / HPC market, so it is likely in high demand there.

That's what AMD has said at least. I was specifically replying to someone talking about future 3D-stacked products. I guess they can stick to stacking more and more cache layers as long as there's cache to stack it on top of, but I'm not sure it will work out as well for logic like the cores or other hotspots on the chip. The patent you've posted about basically shows that it wouldn't be possible without sandwiching a cooler in between the two.

Something this exotic is probably only going to be created for the high-margin server market. Maybe we get a limited edition gamer CPU if the extra cache layers continue to add performance uplift. What I'm curious about is if the cooling is good enough for them to be able to put logic layers on either side of it.
 

Doug S

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2020
3,517
6,225
136
That seems more of an issue with this the first iteration of v-cache CPUs than a fundamental issue with the technology.

Whether that's true or not, how would it invalidate what he said? He said the 5800X3D is too flawed for consumer use, not it and every subsequent 3D Vcache CPU from now until the end of time.
 

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
8,479
7,712
136
Whether that's true or not, how would it invalidate what he said? He said the 5800X3D is too flawed for consumer use, not it and every subsequent 3D Vcache CPU from now until the end of time.

I wouldn't take Charlie's words at exact face value. When he doesn't like something he starts to devolve into a lot of hyperbole.

It is a stupid take though. Even if were "flawed" it still offers some of the best performance you can get and insanely good value in the segment that it competes.
 

tomatosummit

Member
Mar 21, 2019
184
177
116
Whether that's true or not, how would it invalidate what he said? He said the 5800X3D is too flawed for consumer use, not it and every subsequent 3D Vcache CPU from now until the end of time.
It's probably just that the product is not flawed, it's just very niche. Even I think spending more than $200 for a gaming cpu is stupid but apparently it's a market.
It's not a bad general cpu outside of gaming either and why would he be so hung up about overclocking but not mention amd's old statemend of something like "all ryzen am4 cpus are overclockable" which is now no longer true and that the market hasn't demanded overclocking for consumer cpus since intel locked away their K series.

All of charlie's recent articles (that I can read for free) have nose dived in quality and are petulant rants. It's good that he's calling these things out but it's done in a less professional manner or as impartially from what I would have expected of him from years past.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97

MadRat

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
11,998
307
126
That was due to multipliers becoming common. The "bus clock" is merely a reference, everything else runs multipliers off it. That's why it's a bad idea to change it, as every bus in the system will run out of spec*. You could use pretty much any frequency for the purpose, I just think they settled on 100MHz*2 as a nice round number.
When you reach a wall with the CPU then you eek out performance elsewhere. It always bothered me when Intel could squeeze out a 1% margin when GPUs hit bottlenecks. I always suspected they benefitted from a combination of slightly lower memory latency in the controller and fudging on that clock. But even when AMD moved the memory controller on-chip they kept that razor thin margin. It made me think it really is playing with that clock a tiny bit.
 

nicalandia

Diamond Member
Jan 10, 2019
3,331
5,282
136
Some Screenshots from Igor's Lab Review.

1650750075012.png

1650750155979.png

"To say it in advance: The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is AMD’s almost condescending gesture of nonchalance to make use of an Epyc chiplet (“Milan”) with 3D-V cache as a “secondary purpose”, pack it into a normal consumer CPU and “purely by chance” send Intel’s waffle toast in the form of the completely overpowered Core i9-12900KS gallantly into the desert. Let’s call it planned efficiency versus ecological obsolescence or simply the downfall of a CPU with strongly anachronistic features "
 

Doug S

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2020
3,517
6,225
136
So 5800X3D is 2% faster than 12900KS? Yay?

If you can overclock that 12900KS by even 10% it will blow away the 5800X3D. Yes power consumption is a huge problem for Intel and overclocking would make it all that much worse, but given all the reviews I see for 1000 watt power supplies and the coming of 1500 watt power supplies, I thought hardcore gamers didn't care about details like electric bills :)
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,194
16,092
136
So 5800X3D is 2% faster than 12900KS? Yay?

If you can overclock that 12900KS by even 10% it will blow away the 5800X3D. Yes power consumption is a huge problem for Intel and overclocking would make it all that much worse, but given all the reviews I see for 1000 watt power supplies and the coming of 1500 watt power supplies, I thought hardcore gamers didn't care about details like electric bills :)
Heat....I bet gamers don't want all that heat coming out of their case. And I don't think you can overclock the 12900ks much, its already overlcocked from the factory.
 

nicalandia

Diamond Member
Jan 10, 2019
3,331
5,282
136
So 5800X3D is 2% faster than 12900KS? Yay?
No amount of Overclocking will make the 12900KS faster than 5800X3D on titles that take advantage of the 3D V-Cache.

Many People saw this coming. The Broadwell with it's L4 Cache is still good enough to beat 10900K, Now a better implementation is doing the same to the 12900KS

1650751562760.png
 
Last edited:

RnR_au

Platinum Member
Jun 6, 2021
2,640
6,088
136
So 5800X3D is 2% faster than 12900KS? Yay?

If you can overclock that 12900KS by even 10% it will blow away the 5800X3D. Yes power consumption is a huge problem for Intel and overclocking would make it all that much worse, but given all the reviews I see for 1000 watt power supplies and the coming of 1500 watt power supplies, I thought hardcore gamers didn't care about details like electric bills :)
Its twice the price with twice the fan noise. Or you go water...

What would a 12900KS with a 1500w psu look like in a sff?

Horses for courses :)
 

scannall

Golden Member
Jan 1, 2012
1,960
1,678
136
So 5800X3D is 2% faster than 12900KS? Yay?

If you can overclock that 12900KS by even 10% it will blow away the 5800X3D. Yes power consumption is a huge problem for Intel and overclocking would make it all that much worse, but given all the reviews I see for 1000 watt power supplies and the coming of 1500 watt power supplies, I thought hardcore gamers didn't care about details like electric bills :)
For me anyway, I like silent computers. Currently I am running a 5800 (Non X) and a RTX 3070. The GPU is the bottleneck anyway, so I see no reason to push more volts. I get 4.2 Ghz all core boost. Or on lightly threaded things 4.7 Ghz on up to 3 cores. Stress testing the CPU it has never gone over 61 degrees. Idles at 27. And the most watts I have seen it draw was 75.8 on an all core stress test. And it runs dead silent.

I think for most AM4 1, 2 and 3 series owners the 5700X is the sweet spot.
 

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
8,479
7,712
136
Heat....I bet gamers don't want all that heat coming out of their case. And I don't think you can overclock the 12900ks much, its already overlcocked from the factory.

If you're running a 3090 or a 3090 Ti what's another 100W? The people who can afford any of this top end hardware can probably afford the AC.
 

ondma

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2018
3,306
1,689
136
No amount of Overclocking will make the 12900KS faster than 5800X3D on titles that take advantage of the 3D V-Cache.

Many People saw this coming. The Broadwell with it's L4 Cache is still good enough to beat 10900K, Now a better implementation is doing the same to the 12900KS

View attachment 60488
And the 12900k is faster in other games, even without overclocking. So it comes down to the particular games that you play. Your statement is like saying "We have an undefeated record if you only count the games that we won." Not saying that the 5800X3D isnt impressive, especially with the low power consumption, but come on, lets tell both sides of the story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elfear and Thibsie

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,194
16,092
136
And the 12900k is faster in other games, even without overclocking. So it comes down to the particular games that you play. Your statement is like saying "We have an undefeated record if you only count the games that we won." Not saying that the 5800X3D isnt impressive, especially with the low power consumption, but come on, lets tell both sides of the story.
OK, what games does it win ? got a review from a respected site ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and Drazick

coercitiv

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2014
7,346
17,393
136
No amount of Overclocking will make the 12900KS faster than 5800X3D on titles that take advantage of the 3D V-Cache.

Many People saw this coming. The Broadwell with it's L4 Cache is still good enough to beat 10900K, Now a better implementation is doing the same to the 12900KS

View attachment 60488
A note for the future: don't use Anandtech charts when making a point about gaming performance with relation to the memory subsystem. Anandtech tests with stock memory speeds @ JEDEC timings, which means DDR4 2933 for the 10900K.
 

Insert_Nickname

Diamond Member
May 6, 2012
4,971
1,695
136
When you reach a wall with the CPU then you eek out performance elsewhere.

Thing is today I have a CPU with 8C/16T @ 4650MHz capable of 1100GFLOPS+ (that's 1.1TFLOPS...!). I don't feel the need to squeeze every last ounce of performance out of it anymore, like we did 20 years ago with single core CPUs barely capable of a single gigahertz.

If you'd told me the hardware specs of my currently PC 20 years ago, I'd probably have replied with disbelief, laughter and a "you're pulling my leg"... :D (Bonus points for mentioning the EUV manufactoring, which was science fiction back then)