Well, it depends on the leaker. Kitty Yuuko is the only one saying that.
I laughed so hard when I saw this Tweet because I knew exactly what it was all about.Hm, this makes no sense especially after earlier Computex presentation.
But it makes sense, if 3D V-Cache is too expensive+AMD intends to launch the Zen 4 Raphael APU earlier than expected.
The AMD video also confirmes PCIe 5 on the AMD A5 platform in 2022 🙂
The conclusion of the whole mess is: XT for OEMs, V$ for DIY (plus some XTs as well probably)
Looking at patents is a decent way out of that if that's your cup of tea. 😉The worshipping of anonymous Twitter accounts or clickbait YT'ers is frankly making me take long breaks from hardware content rather than engaging more in the community.
Uhhh
Does TSMC even support stacking on N6 yet? N5 isn't scheduled until Q4 2022.
The XT has more been for the higher wattage parts. But the idea that Zen 3D is too expensive for OEMs sounds right.
The worshipping of anonymous Twitter accounts or clickbait YT'ers is frankly making me take long breaks from hardware content rather than engaging more in the community.
The one and only leak of Threadripper Zen 3 is on B2 stepping. And Threadripper has higher power budget, so you may be onto something...
lol +1.The worshipping of anonymous Twitter accounts or clickbait YT'ers is frankly making me take long breaks from hardware content rather than engaging more in the community.
It's less about pricing and more about focus methinks. AMD just lacks the SoIC bandwidth to feed the OEM, DIY and server markets all at the same time. The former just happens to be the one where V$ will have the least impact from a marketing perspective, so it gets the chop.The pre-B2 stepping Zen 3 is being phased out completely. Has nothing to do with Threadripper. If what uzzi says ends up happening, all that means is that any Zen 3D models are going to be too pricey for OEMs.
What? No V-cache CPU in 2021? *GROAN*
What? No V-cache CPU in 2021? *GROAN*
What? No V-cache CPU in 2021? *GROAN*
Makes a lot of sense to be honest. They're looking for the cheapest products bought en masse, cheaper than tray pricing. AMD wouldn't do that for the cache chips, tray pricing or cheaper.Looks more like AMD won't be marketing Zen3D to OEMs.
I think that AMD massively screwed up the TR lineup since they switched Socket with Zen 2, then released TR PRO matching most of EPYC features. Too much product overlap going on there. If I was a Zen 2 TR user I would be angry that AMD left me without upgrade path, but it makes sense to unify everything behind TR PRO than to have Socket 754/939 coexisting all over again.As few of us speculated here, AMD apparently cancelled Threadripper Zen 3
I think that AMD massively screwed up the TR lineup since they switched Socket with Zen 2, then released TR PRO matching most of EPYC features. Too much product overlap going on there. If I was a Zen 2 TR user I would be angry that AMD left me without upgrade path, but it makes sense to unify everything behind TR PRO than to have Socket 754/939 coexisting all over again.
Yeah, the Threadripper platform / SKUs are quite illogical. You could buy 16 core TR on 8 channel platform, but the 4 channel platform, the minimum is 24 cores