Elixer
Lifer
- May 7, 2002
- 10,371
- 762
- 126
Originally posted by: yukichigai
I'll reiterate this point again and again and again until people get it: being further away from the Central Office doesn't necessarily mean your speed goes down. Back in the old old OLD days of DSL that was true, but now most telcoms that offer DSL service deploy Remote Terminals capable of being DSL endpoints at various locations throughout their coverage area. These are almost always linked up to the CO via fiberoptic (and a lot of it) so the speed you get at X feet from an RTS will almost always be the same as the speed you get X feet from the CO. (give or take a millisecond of latency)
Besides, AT&T will only give you 6M DSL if you are within a certain number of feet of the CO or an RTS, (6,000-something according to the article) unless you get an override from the engineering department. (They have to come out and run some tests to verify that you're capable of getting the speed) 90% of the time if they let you sign up for 6M down (that's maximum 6M down, by the way) you'll get something in the 4.5~6M down range.
For those of you worried about the cost of the phone line, look into Federal Universal Phone Line service (cheap pricing if you make under 12k a year, e.g. college students) or a metered line. (Usually $5/mo + taxes, then a ~$0.20/min charge per call, which can easily be avoided by never plugging in a phone)
Finally, someone posted some decent info.
Last time they had this "deal" in my area, they told me "up to" 6Mb. As I questioned on, they said it can vary from 1.5Mb to 6Mb depending on line conditions, and distance from CO. Read the fine print, and you will see where they talk about this. Take a look at the possible fees they talk about for sending a line tech over.
As far as I am concerned, we need more competiton in phone/cable tv/HSI/ and so on.. so bring em on!
