it's kind of a moo point, though, considering that the general public doesn't read in the first place.e-ink may be way better but i have serious doubts that the general public has any clue about that.
it's kind of a moo point, though, considering that the general public doesn't read in the first place.e-ink may be way better but i have serious doubts that the general public has any clue about that.
This one seems to me written by someone addicted to apple.
Link to article
1. Digital cameras - replaced by start phones.
Epic Fail - lot of ppl still care about the sensor and lens not to mention the flash and battery life.
2. Video-Game Consoles - again, replaced by start phones
OMG EPIC PHAIL x 2 - are you fvckin kidding me, did he totally forget about graphics quality, screen size and interactivity...
3. Navigation Devices - again, replaced by start phones
Somewhat agree - but a standalone device that just does its job will always be popular and right now the smartphone based GPS are a joke.
4. Tablets
5. Netbooks
6. E-Readers
All replaced by ipads I guess... and understandably so, they were never really popular with the masses.
What I find funny is his love for iStuff... I guess he has already replaced his vibrators with them...
6. Amazon just released a $139 Kindle, which was low enough that I finally bought one. It was difficult for me to spend that much on a single purpose device, but no other device can really beat an eReader for reading... except paper, but then I have to store it.
13. I'd say my phone has taken over a good portion of the responsibilities of my GPS. Downside - Google Maps needs Internet connectivity, and if I'm in a completely unfamiliar area I'll still want turn by turn voice directions from my GPS.
.
The reason I will never buy an eReader, unless maybe the Sony one - is because I refuse to be limited to one store. On my iPhone I can buy from any store, and if I really want to be stuck with DRM crap, I can download individual apps for the stores I want to buy the eBooks from. Amazon, B&N, whoever.
I would never touch a kindle.
The reason I will never buy an eReader, unless maybe the Sony one - is because I refuse to be limited to one store. On my iPhone I can buy from any store, and if I really want to be stuck with DRM crap, I can download individual apps for the stores I want to buy the eBooks from. Amazon, B&N, whoever.
I would never touch a kindle.
This one seems to me written by someone addicted to apple.
Link to article
1. Digital cameras - replaced by start phones.
Epic Fail - lot of ppl still care about the sensor and lens not to mention the flash and battery life.
2. Video-Game Consoles - again, replaced by start phones
OMG EPIC PHAIL x 2 - are you fvckin kidding me, did he totally forget about graphics quality, screen size and interactivity...
3. Navigation Devices - again, replaced by start phones
Somewhat agree - but a standalone device that just does its job will always be popular and right now the smartphone based GPS are a joke.
4. Tablets
5. Netbooks
6. E-Readers
All replaced by ipads I guess... and understandably so, they were never really popular with the masses.
What I find funny is his love for iStuff... I guess he has already replaced his vibrators with them...
"If I have an iPhone vs. a dedicated game machine, I'm still going to have a Nintendo Wii in my house because I can't do those things on the iPhone," Dulaney says. "If it ever turned out that the iPhone could do all the gestures I needed, then the Wii is under pressure and would fade away."
You don't like being lock down to a single device but are an Apple fanboi??? *ERROR* *ERROR*
Public displays of affection.
We'll be making love to robots soon enough.
If I'm not mistaken, Maps only needs connectivity when it first loads.
Personally I agree with a lot of the article. Especially the digital camera piece. My iPhone4 now replaces my point and shoot. Nice to only carry one device for phone, mp3 player and camera.
I think the point of the article was missed here.
"Endangered" is the key word.
It's talking about things that are in risk of going away, not that have already been replaced.
I'd swear this is the exact same article they had 6 months ago.
Do they get fucking paid? Or are they doing it for free and hoping their names will get noticed? Cuz nobody should be paid for those articles.
I don't have a start phone.
KT
I think the point of the article was missed here.
"Endangered" is the key word.
It's talking about things that are in risk of going away, not that have already been replaced.
