• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

50 years is a looooooooong time to be trying

moshquerade

moshquerade

No Lifer
Pic of mother at link


Another 70-year-old in India has IVF baby
Elderly woman and her first child are both doing well, newspaper reports.

msnbc.com
updated 11:43 a.m. ET, Mon., Dec. 8, 2008

A 70-year-old woman in India gave birth to her first child, a girl, after undergoing infertility treatment, according to a report in the Daily Mail.

The mother, Rajo Devi, had been trying for 50 years to get pregnant with her 72-year-old husband, who had failed to become a father in two prior marriages. It was undetermined whose egg and sperm were used in the treatment, the newspaper reported.

Devi became pregnant through in vitro fertilization at a clinic in the northern Indian state of Haryana after doctors determined that she was healthy enough to survive a high-risk pregnancy. The mother and her infant daughter are reportedly both doing well.

Devi is the second 70-year-old in India to give birth this year. In July, Omkari Panwar, a mother of two daughters ? and grandmother to five ? gave birth via Caesarean section to twins, a boy and girl, after undergoing IVF. At the time, Panwar ? although she had no birth certificate, so her age couldn't be verified ? became the oldest woman to give birth. In 2006, a 67-year-old woman in Spain gave birth to IVF twins.

Although advances in fertility procedures have increasingly enabled older women to give birth, some medical ethics experts question whether clinics should accept a 70-year-old as a patient. The doctor who treated Devi said he didn't expect any medical problems for the elderly woman and her child, except for the likelihood that the child could be orphaned at an early age because of her parents' old age, the newspaper reported. 😕
Click to expand...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28...wid/11915773?GT1=31037
 
Sorry, but this is plain stupid at that age. Nice service to the kid to be so damn old you wouldn't see it grow up.
 
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
I know who the real father is, and im not telling. 😱
Click to expand...

Yeah, I've heard that dNor will do anything that may or may not have a pulse.
 
I clicked on link, and as it was loading I saw the title in browser and immediately closed it.

I don't want to see a pregnant 70 year old Indian woman.
 
So she had to get pregnant because she's so fucking ugly that no man would do the deed for her?


First off, at her age, as has already been said, this is very unfair to the child.

Next, in a country that's already so overpopulated that it can't begin to feed itself, this is stupid.
 
These people are terrible. What a horrible thing to do to a child.

It's parents will be dead before it's 10 years old.

Real nice people.
 
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: DainBramaged
I think that that's pretty unfair to the child. To put it mildly.
Click to expand...

Yeh, the kid and the parents will all be in diapers at the same time. 😕
Click to expand...

at least they can share.

and, does this now qualify her for MILF status?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top