50 years is a looooooooong time to be trying

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Pic of mother at link


Another 70-year-old in India has IVF baby
Elderly woman and her first child are both doing well, newspaper reports.

msnbc.com
updated 11:43 a.m. ET, Mon., Dec. 8, 2008

A 70-year-old woman in India gave birth to her first child, a girl, after undergoing infertility treatment, according to a report in the Daily Mail.

The mother, Rajo Devi, had been trying for 50 years to get pregnant with her 72-year-old husband, who had failed to become a father in two prior marriages. It was undetermined whose egg and sperm were used in the treatment, the newspaper reported.

Devi became pregnant through in vitro fertilization at a clinic in the northern Indian state of Haryana after doctors determined that she was healthy enough to survive a high-risk pregnancy. The mother and her infant daughter are reportedly both doing well.

Devi is the second 70-year-old in India to give birth this year. In July, Omkari Panwar, a mother of two daughters ? and grandmother to five ? gave birth via Caesarean section to twins, a boy and girl, after undergoing IVF. At the time, Panwar ? although she had no birth certificate, so her age couldn't be verified ? became the oldest woman to give birth. In 2006, a 67-year-old woman in Spain gave birth to IVF twins.

Although advances in fertility procedures have increasingly enabled older women to give birth, some medical ethics experts question whether clinics should accept a 70-year-old as a patient. The doctor who treated Devi said he didn't expect any medical problems for the elderly woman and her child, except for the likelihood that the child could be orphaned at an early age because of her parents' old age, the newspaper reported. :confused:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28...wid/11915773?GT1=31037
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,111
926
126
Sorry, but this is plain stupid at that age. Nice service to the kid to be so damn old you wouldn't see it grow up.
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: DainBramaged
I think that that's pretty unfair to the child. To put it mildly.

Yeh, the kid and the parents will all be in diapers at the same time. :confused:
 

Q

Lifer
Jul 21, 2005
12,042
4
81
I clicked on link, and as it was loading I saw the title in browser and immediately closed it.

I don't want to see a pregnant 70 year old Indian woman.
 

necine

Diamond Member
Jan 25, 2005
3,631
0
0
Originally posted by: Adam8281
text

There's a reason why men can have children basically until they die, and women can't... put that in your bible and smoke it.

nature > *
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,965
140
106
Originally posted by: DainBramaged
I think that that's pretty unfair to the child. To put it mildly.


..where's your cultural sensitivity??

 

johnjohn320

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2001
7,572
2
76
Am I the only one who has noticed the word "satire" in huge letters on that article?
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
65,607
13,986
146
So she had to get pregnant because she's so fucking ugly that no man would do the deed for her?


First off, at her age, as has already been said, this is very unfair to the child.

Next, in a country that's already so overpopulated that it can't begin to feed itself, this is stupid.
 

RocksteadyDotNet

Diamond Member
Jul 29, 2008
3,152
1
0
These people are terrible. What a horrible thing to do to a child.

It's parents will be dead before it's 10 years old.

Real nice people.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,560
30,783
146
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: DainBramaged
I think that that's pretty unfair to the child. To put it mildly.

Yeh, the kid and the parents will all be in diapers at the same time. :confused:

at least they can share.

and, does this now qualify her for MILF status?