5 Broken Cameras

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
How about living where they are not supposed to.

They were told in advance that it was a secure area.

Similar to trying to camp out in the Nevada test range.

Either have the MPs move you out or have a explosive dropped on you.

As to why is was a secured area; take that up with the IDF and the Arabs & Palestinians that attempted to destroy Israel back from '48 through '67.

You get what you sow.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Actualy they are , at least geneticaly , it just happen that
their ancestors switched from judaism to islam...

Any evidence to this effect?
 
Last edited:
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
It's amazing how many people want to protect the same barbaric culture that riots whenever someone makes a silly movie or comic strip about their religion. The same religion that stones women to death for being raped. How people can remain Muslin today and not be ashamed of their religion, I have no idea.
 

Northern Lawn

Platinum Member
May 15, 2008
2,231
2
0
Israel should and could march across the middle east like Alexander the Great and kill every man, women, and child.

For our part, we should try and get Sand Monkey banned.


Mulitple reports of your racist slur, not to be repeated.

Perknose
Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Whiskey16

Golden Member
Jul 11, 2011
1,338
5
76
Thank you, Sand Eagle, for that corroborated report from the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz:

The documentary that should make every decent Israeli ashamed

No moments of reprieve in the probing documentary by Emad Burnat and Guy Davidi, "5 Broken Cameras," which chronicles the struggle in the West Bank Palestinian village of Bil'in.



The soldiers arrive in the dead of night. They kick, they smash, they destroy. They break in, rudely awakening an entire house and its inhabitants, including children and babies. One officer pulls out a detailed document and declares: "This house is declared a 'closed military zone.'" He reads the order - in Hebrew and in a loud voice - to the sleep-dazed, pajama-clad family.


Sadly, a vocal rabble on this site are driven by ideological supremacism and hateful bigotry. Not here to adequately discuss news issues concerning the illegal treatment of legal residents under foreign occupation.


The majority of those who replied to the OP are disenfranchising decent and rational people, such as myself, from being more active on the AnandTech forums. These hate mongering, bigoted, extremists currently have free reign on this site to dish the identical vomit as Anders Breivik did on the forums he had visited. This deeply sullies the reputation of AnandTech.
 

Whiskey16

Golden Member
Jul 11, 2011
1,338
5
76
It's amazing how many people want to protect the same barbaric culture that riots whenever someone makes a silly movie or comic strip about their religion. The same religion that stones women to death for being raped. How people can remain Muslin today and not be ashamed of their religion, I have no idea.
The generalised hatred and blatantly anti-religious bigotry remains strong on AnandTech:

Israel should and could march across the middle east like Alexander the Great and kill every man, women, and child.

For our part, we should try and get Sand Monkey banned.
Despicable, where one supporting the mission of this News & Politics subforum receives opens calls for genocide and of calling out that forum member for banishment due to his race and or religion.

Decades ago in the USA, this forum would have been among those openly calling for its n*ggers to condemnation, banishment, and deportation.

Revolting attitudes then as they are now upon another visible group.

Anders Breivik has his USA wet dream with this continued open support for his doctrines upon AnandTech.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
And we also have people here that believe people should not be held accountable for their actions and do overs are perfectly acceptable.
 

iGas

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2009
6,240
1
0
How about living where they are not supposed to.

They were told in advance that it was a secure area.

Similar to trying to camp out in the Nevada test range.

Either have the MPs move you out or have a explosive dropped on you.

As to why is was a secured area; take that up with the IDF and the Arabs & Palestinians that attempted to destroy Israel back from '48 through '67.

You get what you sow.
How about apply the same rule to the Settlers/Zionists?

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

IMHO, that land doesn't belong to the Jews who claimed as "secure area" then later steal it and built their settlements on. That said those people should be allow to live/work on the land that belong to them.
 
Last edited:

iGas

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2009
6,240
1
0
It's amazing how many people want to protect the same barbaric culture that riots whenever someone makes a silly movie or comic strip about their religion. The same religion that stones women to death for being raped. How people can remain Muslin today and not be ashamed of their religion, I have no idea.
Funny that your bigotry only apply to Arabs/Muslim.

If you need confirmation, I can provide links and pictures of extremists and inequality in every country and religions including Judaism/Christian, America, and Israel.
 
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
Funny that your bigotry only apply to Arabs/Muslim.

If you need confirmation, I can provide links and pictures of extremists and inequality in every country and religions including Judaism/Christian, America, and Israel.

Of course you can; there are wackos in every religious and cultural group. The issue is, are those instances of wackos acting out extreme, rare examples, or are they everyday common occurrences? In the case of Muslims/Arabs, you don't have to look real hard to find such occurrences; they are really starting to add up.
 
Last edited:

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
Israel should and could march across the middle east like Alexander the Great and kill every man, women, and child.

For our part, we should try and get Sand Monkey banned.

I don't agree with most of SandEagle's positions, but I think he's an honest poster who writes about what he truly believes. He's definitely not a troll, and he doesn't engage in the type of intellectually dishonest antics typical of many of our ATPN brethren. So I don't see any basis for having SE banned, nor would I want to see him banned. Unpopular positions? Yes, but that's no reason to silence him.
 

randomrogue

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2011
5,449
0
0
I don't agree with most of SandEagle's positions, but I think he's an honest poster who writes about what he truly believes. He's definitely not a troll, and he doesn't engage in the type of intellectually dishonest antics typical of many of our ATPN brethren. So I don't see any basis for having SE banned, nor would I want to see him banned. Unpopular positions? Yes, but that's no reason to silence him.

I agree. He presents a different point of view and that's fine.
 

Northern Lawn

Platinum Member
May 15, 2008
2,231
2
0
I don't agree with most of SandEagle's positions, but I think he's an honest poster who writes about what he truly believes. He's definitely not a troll, and he doesn't engage in the type of intellectually dishonest antics typical of many of our ATPN brethren. So I don't see any basis for having SE banned, nor would I want to see him banned. Unpopular positions? Yes, but that's no reason to silence him.

Yeah I was just kidding about getting him banned, just talking.

But I really don't like Muslims or people that seem to support them, I really should keep that crap to myself.
 

iGas

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2009
6,240
1
0
Of course you can; there are wackos in every religious and cultural group. The issue is, are those instances of wackos acting out extreme, rare examples, or are they everyday common occurrences? In the case of Muslims/Arabs, you don't have to look real hard to find such occurrences; they are really starting to add up.
Perhaps, but you can't lump everyone together because of the crimes of a few.

IMHO 2 wrongs doesn't make a right, because someone once may have wronged your parents/grandparents it doesn't mean that you have the right to trample over other people rights.

Raped by their saviours: How the survivors of Auschwitz escaped one nightmare only to face another unimaginable ordeal

"This was bad enough, but, as Linda Breder said, 'at least we escaped with our lives'.

Worse was to follow for Linda when she finally made it back to her home town of Stropkov in Slovakia. She walked down her old street and knocked on the door of her house.
'The door was opened by a Russian or Ukrainian man,' she says. He was a complete stranger, and yet he was living in her house.

'Go back to where you came from,' he said, and then slammed the door in her face.
With the Soviets now occupying Slovakia, Linda felt that she had no hope of recovering her past life.
She had been sustained through her time in Auschwitz by the belief that, one day, she could go home and rebuild her shattered existence. That hope was now destroyed.
She turned down the main street of her home town and realised the houses that had previously belonged to friends and relations were now occupied by people from the Soviet Union. Only the non-Jews remained."
 
Last edited:

bononos

Diamond Member
Aug 21, 2011
3,937
190
106
How about living where they are not supposed to.

They were told in advance that it was a secure area.

Similar to trying to camp out in the Nevada test range.

Either have the MPs move you out or have a explosive dropped on you.
As to why is was a secured area; take that up with the IDF and the Arabs & Palestinians that attempted to destroy Israel back from '48 through '67.
You get what you sow.

Where they are not supposed to? But aren't Israeli settlements encroaching on a Palestinian village? Why should there be a single Israeli settlement beyond the green line?

Comparing Bilin to camping in a military base in Nevada is false. The Bilin situation sounds more like Mexicans overrunning El Paso and blaming Texans for being 'where they are not supposed to'.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Where they are not supposed to? But aren't Israeli settlements encroaching on a Palestinian village? Why should there be a single Israeli settlement beyond the green line?

Comparing Bilin to camping in a military base in Nevada is false. The Bilin situation sounds more like Mexicans overrunning El Paso and blaming Texans for being 'where they are not supposed to'.

'closed military zone.'

The house was not supposed to be there; the land had been taken under control by the IDF.

In theory, there can be Israeli settlements anywhere up to the Jordan river; it is land controlled by Israel; lost by Jordan and the Palestinians in the '67 war.
However, the Israeli courts are not allowing complete roughshod over the locals.
(Which is more than the Palestinians and their pals had intended for Israel).

When the Palestinians have a state; then Israeli settlements inside the boundaries of that state will be removed.
 
Last edited: